It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Would it blow your mind if I told you BO has been to NK and perhaps there now?
Why did his administration do little to slow their nuclear and missle capabilities?
Who feeds NK w/ strategic intel? Iran?
What deal was done with Iran under BO?
Why was the deal sealed under a top secret classification?
Why wasn’t Congress notified?
Why after BO left office all of a sudden NK has nukes and the tech to miniaturize for payload delivery within the US? What about NSA CIA DI etc all confirming tech won’t be in place for 5+ years (statements made in 2016).
Why is all of this relevant and what does it tell you?
Big picture is rare.
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
Re: Q Post #39, Chan post ID: 147588085, Nov 2 2017 02:14:27
Would it blow your mind if I told you BO has been to NK and perhaps there now?
Why did his administration do little to slow their nuclear and missle capabilities?
Who feeds NK w/ strategic intel? Iran?
What deal was done with Iran under BO?
Why was the deal sealed under a top secret classification?
Why wasn’t Congress notified?
Why after BO left office all of a sudden NK has nukes and the tech to miniaturize for payload delivery within the US? What about NSA CIA DI etc all confirming tech won’t be in place for 5+ years (statements made in 2016).
Why is all of this relevant and what does it tell you?
Big picture is rare.
(Bold emphasese mine)
A few things in this post, which I've bolded, indicate to me this is a key post we need to uncover facts on?
1) The deal is TOP SECRET so Q can't give us easy leads, however he obviously wants us to uncover it?
2) Why use "w/" for with on one line and then use "with" on the next? People usually use "w/" when rushed and for all occurences in a mail; so using both forms seems deliberate?
3) Can someone tell me what "DI" is, it's not a term we hear in UK? Does it look in place next to NSA and CiA? or is it a SPELLING MISTAKE?
4) "Why is all this relevant and what does it tell you?" - indicates that if we find facts about this it will build proof of something else?
5) "Big picture is rare." - a) this reinforces point 4, b) Rare is an odd term to use - unless the rarity implies great value?
and lasly,
6) Has anyone researched or found any additional info or proofs around this post?
Ps If Q wanted to lead us to something with this but needed plausible deniabilty because it's Top Secret, then a magic square message would be appropriate? I'm assuming the answers needed are more specific than just "CIA uses NK as its autonomous playground".
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
Re: Q Post #39, Chan post ID: 147588085, Nov 2 2017 02:14:27
Would it blow your mind if I told you BO has been to NK and perhaps there now?
Why did his administration do little to slow their nuclear and missle capabilities?
Who feeds NK w/ strategic intel? Iran?
What deal was done with Iran under BO?
Why was the deal sealed under a top secret classification?
Why wasn’t Congress notified?
Why after BO left office all of a sudden NK has nukes and the tech to miniaturize for payload delivery within the US? What about NSA CIA DI etc all confirming tech won’t be in place for 5+ years (statements made in 2016).
Why is all of this relevant and what does it tell you?
Big picture is rare.
(Bold emphasese mine)
A few things in this post, which I've bolded, indicate to me this is a key post we need to uncover facts on?
1) The deal is TOP SECRET so Q can't give us easy leads, however he obviously wants us to uncover it?
2) Why use "w/" for with on one line and then use "with" on the next? People usually use "w/" when rushed and for all occurences in a mail; so using both forms seems deliberate?
3) Can someone tell me what "DI" is, it's not a term we hear in UK? Does it look in place next to NSA and CiA? or is it a SPELLING MISTAKE?
4) "Why is all this relevant and what does it tell you?" - indicates that if we find facts about this it will build proof of something else?
5) "Big picture is rare." - a) this reinforces point 4, b) Rare is an odd term to use - unless the rarity implies great value?
and lasly,
6) Has anyone researched or found any additional info or proofs around this post?
Ps If Q wanted to lead us to something with this but needed plausible deniabilty because it's Top Secret, then a magic square message would be appropriate? I'm assuming the answers needed are more specific than just "CIA uses NK as its autonomous playground".
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Washington Post CEO Don Graham Mentor Each Other
originally posted by: TRUEAWAKENING
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi
Who feeds NK w/strategic intel? Iran?
int.technion.ac.il...
Israel has formed an alliance with Russia (in particular), Iran, China and India to supply high technology in return for trade and political support
www.youtube.com...
He might be using that as his insurance not to be extradited to the U.S.
His house was illegally raided by the police. That makes me think he might have something or might have had something.
He has not said he will be charging money. Just an alernative to current government controlled platforms.
Seems you have dislike for him...is it just because of the Seth Rich issue or?
originally posted by: IAMTAT
CEO of Washington Post is on the BOD of Facebook.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Washington Post CEO Don Graham Mentor Each Other
www.hollywoodreporter.com...
originally posted by: MindBodySpiritComplex
originally posted by: IAMTAT
CEO of Washington Post is on the BOD of Facebook.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Washington Post CEO Don Graham Mentor Each Other
www.hollywoodreporter.com...
And Amazon's Jeff Bezos owns the Washington Post...