InfoWars Videos Banned By YouTube

a reply to: olaru12

I guess we're going to need to ask for sources now.....

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: Deplorable

This is what happens when you make stuff up just to get ratings.

So CNN ot InfoWars?

a reply to: Domo1

All of them..if anyone is paying attention.

a reply to: vonclod
And that supports my point. Why would Google eliminate ad revenue from a popular channel. They are stupid, catering to their biases and hoping they will attract enough viewers to support their nut job attitude.

a reply to: thepixelpusher

That's because they are not.

a reply to: purplemer

No, he is not an actor
If you sincerly believe that,
then you're either being missguided or missguiding.

In any case, if that is your true conviction,
that's a pretty filthy mind set you've got your self right there

a reply to: Deplorable

You know what would be hilarious karma? If the FCC characterized facebook/twitter/youtube/etc as title 2 utilities and regulated them for stifling speech. How could the left protest? I mean, obviously they'd come up with some sort of argument, but it would just be so funny to watch them do a 180.

a reply to: Cassi3l

True, he's not an actor. He's a puppet. Probably told them they'd kill his dad or something.

a reply to: Deplorable

Dems can't win any arguments so they resort to censorship and Stalinist tactics. That's why Dems should never have control of the government. They are totalitarians by nature.

a reply to: thepixelpusher

It's simple: they lost all of their power. Why would Hollywood go harder left , why would the news media push into full on propaganda lies territory, why would google/twitter/fb/reddit purge users/channels/boards who disagree? They lost political power and this is the only power they have left. They're flailing. They know the damage that has been done to them has been done by alternative media and free speech.

Remember, demographics said republicans COULD NOT WIN the presidency ever again. So what changed? The information people received. Their minds were changed, and that's unacceptable to the ruling elite.

Infowars should go straight to cable tv and duke it out with CNN.

a reply to: liveandlearn

But the government with it's majority republicans has nothing to do with this.

Youtube , a private business, decided to do this.

A private business should be allowed to censor ANY content they chose. At least in a free country they should.

a reply to: MostlyReading

How long before business rights are taken away and the people get to decide what I can do with my private business platform.

Youtube being allowed to decide what happens with their property is more freedom not less.

a reply to: muSSang

I'm so thankful that google can decide what to do with their own property and business. Freedom!

a reply to: NightSkyeB4Dawn

Unless it is agenda driven, then no surprise.

That's freedom though.

They should be free to have an agenda if they want. It's a private business. If you don't like it than don't use it.
Youtube is not mandatory.
Facebook is not mandatory.
twitter is not mandatory.

Stop acting like your lives are ruined unless someone else's private business does business they way you want them to.

a reply to: rockintitz

promote ultra liberal values

Liberal values like a private business owner deciding what content can be on their private servers?

Stupid liberals...

If alex doesn't like it he can use some of his millions of dollars to promote his own website instead of using youtubes for free.

If not for youtube most people wouldn't even know who alex jones was.

a reply to: scraedtosleep

When you start altering or removing content you become responsible for the content that appears on your site (that's not already explicitly illegal see child pornography or live assaults), which makes you not so much a public platform as a curated platform. It's going to create an interesting legal dynamic for them.

a reply to: Dfairlite

Then alex can take it to court. I'll be fine with whatever the ruling ends up being.

a reply to: scraedtosleep

I don't know that he can. My point wasn't about jones, it was about google. Google opens themselves up to a lot of lawsuits if they begin censoring. Reddit ran into this issue when it was discovered that spez was editing/removing posts because he disagreed with them.