InfoWars Videos Banned By YouTube

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: DBCowboy

DBCowboy, the problem is that those platforms are the property of private entities. If they weren't you could make reasonable complaint and actually have it mean something.

I have no problem criticizing private entities of censorship.

I believe they are doing much of it for political reasons. They are doing it by proxy so government can keep it's hands clean.

And yet here you are abiding to the T&C censorship model on a private enterprise website. Tell it to the 3 amigos and see what happens. Political or just business as usual?

Failure on your part.

ATS doesn't pretend to be one thing and do another.

But nice try.

As a consolation prize, you get a MAGA hat that doubles as. . . . . . . another MAGA hat!

originally posted by: DBCowboy


Censorship is having a site dedicated to the free flow of ideas and banning those who have different ideas.

Problem is YouTube is a private company that can and will do what it thinks is best for its business model. No freedom of speech there...

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: DBCowboy


Censorship is having a site dedicated to the free flow of ideas and banning those who have different ideas.

Problem is YouTube is a private company that can and will do what it thinks is best for its business model. No freedom of speech there...

Then it should market itself as a leftist site that only caters to those who adhere to it.

a reply to: DBCowboy
Hyperbole much?
Go look up Alex Jones or Infowars on youtube..report back on how many vids there.

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: DBCowboy
Hyperbole much?
Go look up Alex Jones or Infowars on youtube..report back on how many vids there.

If you wait until it's too late to speak up about censorship, then it'll be too late to do anything about it.

But promote censorship if you wish.

We still have free speech, mostly.

a reply to: DBCowboy

My buddy makes RC car and trail truck video's..had lots removed when he used the wrong music(copyrighted) it wasn't censorship.
Do we know why AJ had one or two out of 600,000+ vids removed even? It's an honest question.
One poster suggested he might of used vid that was copyrighted, or the owner did not like being used by him..if true that is not censorship.
I agree with you pretty much, on free speech..AJ should be free to spout his ridiculous entertainment.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: DBCowboy


Censorship is having a site dedicated to the free flow of ideas and banning those who have different ideas.

Problem is YouTube is a private company that can and will do what it thinks is best for its business model. No freedom of speech there...

Then it should market itself as a leftist site that only caters to those who adhere to it.

Failure on your part.

A business should be free of censorship and market itself any way it damn well pleases. Let market forces determine its success or failure after all the business takes the chances, pays the bills, all the over head....I know, I own and operate a business.

Nice try though...

and your nice consolation prize is a hot steaming bowl of covfefe....enjoy!!

This even made the drudge report. Alex must be loving this. Expect to hear him rant about this for a week or so.

a reply to: dfnj2015

Not nice to talk about CNN like that.

It was CNN that publicized live the Russian organized anti-Trump rally.

It was Adam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi, and Hillary Clinton who fulfilled the Russian purpose of convincing Americans the election was flawed by promoting the now proven false theory that Trump agents colluded with the Russians to fix the election.

Now that almost sounds like "collusion" to me. Good thing we don't use the same flimsy evidentiary standards some here are apparently OK with. Look at the death threats that poor woman in Florida recieved. A democrat actually called her a Russian agent, threatened to hang the President and threatened to try her for treason. These people are sick. No wonder they want to disarm us though, would enable them to carry out their delusions and enact their authoritarian socialist %%%%hole nightmare.. or as they say.."Utopia"

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: Deplorable

This is what happens when you make stuff up just to get ratings.

What like CNN, Fox News, The BBC etc..

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: DBCowboy


Censorship is having a site dedicated to the free flow of ideas and banning those who have different ideas.

Problem is YouTube is a private company that can and will do what it thinks is best for its business model. No freedom of speech there...

Then it should market itself as a leftist site that only caters to those who adhere to it.

Failure on your part.

A business should be free of censorship and market itself any way it damn well pleases. Let market forces determine its success or failure after all the business takes the chances, pays the bills, all the over head....I know, I own and operate a business.

Nice try though...

and your nice consolation prize is a hot steaming bowl of covfefe....enjoy!!

Really must be a special kind of special to support internet censorship.

a reply to: purplemer



Absolutely

CNN, Fox, BBC, MSNBC, PBS, NBC, CBS, all are MSM "entertainment" ""media.""

Sadly real journalism is dead.

a reply to: UKTruth

Infowars - claim CNN have coached a student and he is an actor - picking on victims, right?

Yes he is an actor.. !

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: purplemer



Absolutely

CNN, Fox, BBC, MSNBC, PBS, NBC, CBS, all are MSM "entertainment" ""media.""

Sadly real journalism is dead.

Under attack but not dead

a reply to: purplemer



Thanks for that glimmer of hope Purplemer

It means a lot.

"In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." -Orwell

"Those who would sacrifice essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -B. Franklin

a reply to: purplemer

yes alex jones is an actor!

originally posted by: donnydeevil
How could anyone ban this, I mean it is not like he is constantly spreading false propaganda...Oh wait.

At the same time, free speech (outside of hate speech or incitement to violence) shouldn't be banned. That includes conspiracy theories you don't believe in. Also, the media and leaders regularly peddle propAganda for things like war. Are you supporting banning them?

originally posted by: DBCowboy

Then it should market itself as a leftist site that only caters to those who adhere to it.

It can market itself anyway it wants... It could say we are extreme right!! and to everything extreme left, so it is not them that labels themselves it is those who observe them that do it. You and others can choose to not go there or support...that is the way it goes, my friend.

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: DBCowboy


Censorship is having a site dedicated to the free flow of ideas and banning those who have different ideas.

Problem is YouTube is a private company that can and will do what it thinks is best for its business model. No freedom of speech there...

Then it should market itself as a leftist site that only caters to those who adhere to it.

Failure on your part.

A business should be free of censorship and market itself any way it damn well pleases. Let market forces determine its success or failure after all the business takes the chances, pays the bills, all the over head....I know, I own and operate a business.

Nice try though...

and your nice consolation prize is a hot steaming bowl of covfefe....enjoy!!

At some point though that just becomes sophist rationalizing that only serves the powerful. It's the same with FB and Google. At the point you have near monopolies on platforms and connections to intelligence and government agencies, and are censoring certain voices, it bleeds into collusion with the military industrial complex or oligarchy. They are serving a virtual propaganda purpose on contract from the powerful. If you can't see that danger I can't help you.