How I prove God exists.

Atheists don't practice critical thinking and clear writing, because they don't know anything about how to think critically and how to write clearly.

Why?

Because they hide inside their brain instead of coming out into the objective world of empirical reality: like the nose on their face, babies and roses, the sun in the day sky, the moon in the evening sky.

Hiding inside their brain, they still have the natural instinct of animals which can manage to deceive themselves and mankind with spinning and weaving obfuscation and obscurantism, or worse silly semantics, or playing dumb - so that they cannot be blamed as malingering from the office of every homo sapiens to get intelligent, and see the objective world of empirical reality: which is the evidence of God existing, in concept as first and foremost the creator cause of everything with a beginning.

Dear readers here, now they will tell you that they can't understand my English.

Hahahahahahahahaha!

See, Oh ye atheists, if you can understand this statement from me:

The default status of things in the totality of reality is existence.

a reply to: Pachomius

Narcissistic Personality Disorder

Individuals with this disorder exhibit a lack of ability to empathize with others and an inflated sense of self-importance.
Definition

The hallmarks of Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) are grandiosity, a lack of empathy for other people, and a need for admiration. People with this condition are frequently described as arrogant, self-centered, manipulative, and demanding. They may also concentrate on grandiose fantasies (e.g. their own success, beauty, brilliance) and may be convinced that they deserve special treatment. These characteristics typically begin in early adulthood and must be consistently evident in multiple contexts, such as at work and in relationships.

People with narcissistic personality disorder believe they are superior or special, and often try to associate with other people they believe are unique or gifted in some way. This association enhances their self-esteem, which is typically quite fragile underneath the surface. Individuals with NPD seek excessive admiration and attention in order to know that others think highly of them. Individuals with narcissistic personality disorder have difficulty tolerating criticism or defeat, and may be left feeling humiliated or empty when they experience an "injury" in the form of criticism or rejection.

a reply to: Pachomius

BTW the your proof isn't even original.
It's just a re-wording of the Cosmological Argument less elegantly presented.
It's funny that you actually refer to yourself in your proof as well with makes it subjective not objective.

Whatever begins to exist has a cause.
The Universe began to exist.
Therefore, the Universe had a cause.

a reply to: Pachomius

Atheists don't practice critical thinking and clear writing, because they don't know anything about how to think critically and how to write clearly. Why?

Because your brain tells you so.


Its so ironic.

you really need think a little critically because saying that, brushing with such a wide brush shows a level of ignorance and narcissism that cant be rationalized with.

I hope you with all your enlightened knowledge of how others think or as you say, don't think,

how atheist deceive themselves and cant write clearly,

I hope you never come to realize and see what others do in you, stay strong with your delusion, the real world might shatter that peanut upstairs.

Dear Pachomius, I beseech you add your proof to the wikipedia entry on Existence of God.

I mean if it's really valid it would change the world. The world should know. You will also get better exposure and attract high IQ individuals that can understand your proof and agree with you.

en.wikipedia.org...

BTW I am definitely not an atheist. You seem to call anyone that disagrees with you an Atheist.

Thanks a lot for your reactions to my last post here, see Annex below.

Do you anyone notice that no one has taken my challenge to everyone here, from atheists to anyone else of whatever isms:

See, Oh ye atheists [and everyone else of any isms], if you can understand this statement from me:

The default status of things in the totality of reality is existence.

Yes, you have an excuse, namely, you can't understand my English!

Hahahahahahahahaha!

If you dare to seek and succeed to understand that statement from me, then give it back to me in your own words, in less than 50 words.

Hahahahahahahahaha!


Annex

originally posted by: Pachomius

Atheists don't practice critical thinking and clear writing, because they don't know anything about how to think critically and how to write clearly.

Why?

Because they hide inside their brain instead of coming out into the objective world of empirical reality: like the nose on their face, babies and roses, the sun in the day sky, the moon in the evening sky.

Hiding inside their brain, they still have the natural instinct of animals which can manage to deceive themselves and mankind with spinning and weaving obfuscation and obscurantism, or worse silly semantics, or playing dumb - so that they cannot be blamed as malingering from the office of every homo sapiens to get intelligent, and see the objective world of empirical reality: which is the evidence of God existing, in concept as first and foremost the creator cause of everything with a beginning.

Dear readers here, now they will tell you that they can't understand my English.

Hahahahahahahahaha!

See, Oh ye atheists, if you can understand this statement from me:

The default status of things in the totality of reality is existence.

a reply to: Pachomius

That's because it's new age nonsense.

You are saying:

The default state of things in the whole of the state of things as they actually exist is the state of being real and able to interact with the universe.

Not good enough.

Seek the counsel of experts in reading comprehension.

You are into rote memory writing: bereft of genuine thinking on truths, facts, logic, and the best thoughts of mankind from since the dawn of man's conscious intelligence.

Try again.

originally posted by: Deluxe
a reply to: Pachomius

That's because it's new age nonsense.

You are saying:

The default state of things in the whole of the state of things as they actually exist is the state of being real and able to interact with the universe.

a reply to: Pachomius

This is exactly what you are doing:

en.wikipedia.org...

"Proof by assertion, sometimes informally referred to as proof by repeated assertion, is an informal fallacy in which a proposition is repeatedly restated regardless of contradiction.[1] Sometimes, this may be repeated until challenges dry up, at which point it is asserted as fact due to its not being contradicted (argumentum ad nauseam).[2] In other cases, its repetition may be cited as evidence of its truth, in a variant of the appeal to authority or appeal to belief fallacies.[3]"

You are using this strategy as well:
en.wikipedia.org...

"Ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.[2]"

I expect now that my challenges have dried up you will reassert your proposition like you've done on numerous occasions in this thread.
If I continue to post you will resort to to insulting my intelligence again.

Here let me help you:

"Dear readers here, for the recall of everyone, I will reproduce the OP.



originally posted by: Pachomiusposted on Feb, 10 2018 @ 05:23 PM

Title of thread: How I prove God exists.

1. I define God as in concept first and foremost the creator cause of everything with a beginning.
2. So I search for everything with a beginning to its existence.
3. And I find everything I experience to be in existence having a beginning to its existence.
4. There, that is the evidence of God existing, in concept as first and foremost the creator cause of everything with a beginning.
5. Wherefore God exists, in concept as first and foremost the creator cause of everything with a beginning."

Please, de Deluxe, I like very much to convince you to talk for yourself and with your very own personally mined words, from your very own personal thinking.

Stop citing common web sources to talk for you.

Again:

What is your best comprehension of my statement, in less than 50 words:

"The default status of things in the totality of reality is existence."

originally posted by: Deluxe
a reply to: Pachomius

This is exactly what you are doing:

en.wikipedia.org...

"Proof by assertion, sometimes informally referred to as proof by repeated assertion, is an informal fallacy in which a proposition is repeatedly restated regardless of contradiction.[1] Sometimes, this may be repeated until challenges dry up, at which point it is asserted as fact due to its not being contradicted (argumentum ad nauseam).[2] In other cases, its repetition may be cited as evidence of its truth, in a variant of the appeal to authority or appeal to belief fallacies.[3]"

You are using this strategy as well:
en.wikipedia.org...

"Ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.[2]"

I expect now that my challenges have dried up you will reassert your proposition like you've done on numerous occasions in this thread.
If I continue to post you will resort to to insulting my intelligence again.

Here let me help you:

"Dear readers here, for the recall of everyone, I will reproduce the OP.



originally posted by: Pachomiusposted on Feb, 10 2018 @ 05:23 PM

Title of thread: How I prove God exists.

1. I define God as in concept first and foremost the creator cause of everything with a beginning.
2. So I search for everything with a beginning to its existence.
3. And I find everything I experience to be in existence having a beginning to its existence.
4. There, that is the evidence of God existing, in concept as first and foremost the creator cause of everything with a beginning.
5. Wherefore God exists, in concept as first and foremost the creator cause of everything with a beginning."

a reply to: Pachomius

First I think you mean "state" not "status"
You are saying the default state of things that exist is existence.
This really doesn't mean anything to me.
Perhaps in your mind it means something but you need to communicate it better to the masses.

Back on topic.
What does this even have to do with your original proof that God exists?
It's not part of your original proof.

Dear Deluxe, here is the status of existence, namely, it is always the reality of existence, there has never been any status but that of existence.

Now, scientists investigate the existence of things in the universe, which they maintain to be in the material sort of existence, which is encapsulated in time and in space, and they have a beginning: everything in the universe studied by scientists, including the universe itself, they have a beginning.

As these things have a beginning, then they are from a cause that is not one among themselves which are things with a beginning.

And they are the evidence for the existence of God, in concept as first and foremost he creator cause of everything with beginning.

a reply to: Pachomius

What you just responded with is incomprehensible.
It's just a really well-tossed word salad.

I'm guessing you haven't had a good education in Mathematics/Physics/Philosophy.
It's obvious that you haven't studied the Philosophy of Logic at least.

Anyhow congrats on proving God exists. You are famous now.

How I prove God exists.

Just show the infinite mathmatical odds
against this existence without hhhim. The
odds of all we experience everyday being
given over to successful chance without
design, planning and infinite intelligence?

That would be a miracle to impress God
himself.

Now, it seems to me he only needs to
be proven to people who won't give a crap
if you do? Nothing to prove.

Dear Deluxe, I do not read anything from you of any worth in regard to your whatever argument on whatever you are driving at.

Try again.

originally posted by: Deluxe
a reply to: Pachomius

What you just responded with is incomprehensible.
It's just a really well-tossed word salad.

I'm guessing you haven't had a good education in Mathematics/Physics/Philosophy.
It's obvious that you haven't studied the Philosophy of Logic at least.

Anyhow congrats on proving God exists. You are famous now.

Dear randyvs, read below on how I prove God exists.

originally posted by: Pachomius
posted on Feb, 10 2018 @ 05:23 PM

1. I define God as in concept first and foremost the creator cause of everything with a beginning.
2. So I search for everything with a beginning to its existence.
3. And I find everything I experience to be in existence having a beginning to its existence.
4. There, that is the evidence of God existing, in concept as first and foremost the creator cause of everything with a beginning.
5. Wherefore God exists, in concept as first and foremost the creator cause of everything with a beginning.

Please, dear randyvs, present your argument on whatever you are driving at.

originally posted by: randyvs

How I prove God exists.

Just show the infinite mathmatical odds
against this existence without hhhim. The
odds of all we experience everyday being
given over to successful chance without
design, planning and infinite intelligence?

That would be a miracle to impress God
himself.

Now, it seems to me he only needs to
be proven to people who won't give a crap
if you do? Nothing to prove.

originally posted by: Pachomius


Atheists don't practice critical thinking and clear writing, because they don't know anything about how to think critically and how to write clearly.

They do know Earth is not flat, Earth is not the center of universe, bat is not bird, whale is not fish, unicorns don't have fossil records, etc..

originally posted by: Pachomius
Why?

Because they hide inside their brain instead of coming out into the objective world of empirical reality: like the nose on their face, babies and roses, the sun in the day sky, the moon in the evening sky.

I think you mean empirical reality as delution or mythical reality.

originally posted by: Pachomius
Hiding inside their brain, they still have the natural instinct of animals which can manage to deceive themselves and mankind with spinning and weaving obfuscation and obscurantism, or worse silly semantics, or playing dumb - so that they cannot be blamed as malingering from the office of every homo sapiens to get intelligent, and see the objective world of empirical reality: which is the evidence of God existing, in concept as first and foremost the creator cause of everything with a beginning.

You mean you are not a mammal? So what are you? A plant or a rock?

originally posted by: Pachomius
Dear readers here, now they will tell you that they can't understand my English.

Hahahahahahahahaha!

Sure. Mad men can speak english too. It doesn't have to be logical.

originally posted by: Pachomius
The default status of things in the totality of reality is existence.

My poop exist. I don't know how you relate it as a proof to god existence.

Proof of God will only happen if he drops his wallet over Earth, and the giant leather billfold falls gently down on the 'HOLLYWOOD' sign, smashing it to pieces. A crane pulls out his ID, which says "God' on it.

And that will be the definitive proof that God exists, until CNN says otherwise

a reply to: Pachomius

Simple terms it isn't necessary to prove God
exists. It can't be done scientifically because
he is a gentleman. He has abliged our request
to go it alone. Science safe harbors atheism.
If I were on the moon no one could prove
Scintifically I exist either. But it's obvious that
I do. But science would serve those who
hate me with a means to deny my very
existence. But those who love me would
remember me. So a lack of scientific
evidence isn't proof of anything. It's just
a fallacy of the unwise.

a reply to: randyvs

I say it can be done scientifically but science fails the sciencers continually because there lack of faith in their works.

Simply put reality is repeatable but we lack the knowledge and power.

Good to see you posting again