Ex-Clinton Foundation Exec Linked To Chinese Kindergarten Under Investigation For Child Molestation

a reply to: Chadwickus

Chadders my old bean. Wake and smell the coffee..! The worms are being flushed out of the woodwork.

Thank you OP.. star and flag

a reply to: purplemer

You do do not get to the truth by making up lies.

But for people like you, as long as it goes against whatever it is you fear/hate, then it’s all good, right?

You make yourself look stupid when you can’t/won’t seperate the wheat from the chaff.

I’ve seen it in the 911 forums, the chemtrail forums, and now it’s anything to do with the Clintons.

Why? Is it peer pressure? Just don’t care? Trying to be kewl with your peers?

Kind of a flimsy connection isn't it?
I guess it's slow news today.
This type of thread reeks of desperation for acceptance by the hive.
Hey look at me I have something against clinton. Kind of ... Sort of... Not really but hey they're mentioned.

a reply to: purplemer

What does this really have to do with the Clintons though?

Nothing.

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: eisegesis

So you’re of the belief that directors have direct control of the day to day running of a business?

Because they don’t.

Even less so an independent director, which this Getz guy is.

Independent Director as defined by NYSE..

Although the listing standards of the NYSE and Nasdaq are somewhat specific about director independence, boards are left to their own devices to determine who is independent because of three words: “no material relationship.” The actual NYSE standards state: “no director qualifies as ‘independent’ unless the board of directors affirmatively determines that the director has ‘no material relationship’ with the listed company, either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the company.”

tcbblogs.org...

But that doesn’t matter though, does it?

You would actually defend this guy and make excuses for him???

Wow.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: purplemer

What does this really have to do with the Clintons though?

Nothing.

Actually more than anyone could possibly imagine.

a reply to: gernblan

I guess so, considering there is zero evidence of him actually doing anything wrong.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: purplemer

What does this really have to do with the Clintons though?

Nothing.

Trump was in China. Now this. Connect the dots..

originally posted by: Chadwickus

Why? Is it peer pressure? Just don’t care? Trying to be kewl with your peers?

Why are so many people who are befriended with Clinton (Epstein, Weinstein, Weiner, Podesta, Al Waleed and and and) in some way connected either to rape, child rape, child sexual abuse or molestation?)

Who someone associates with, reveals who they are. So we are asking the question: Who is Hillary to have friends like that?

This has nothing to do with being "kewl with our peers" as you say, and all to do with #DrainTheSwamp and #LockHerUp.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: purplemer

What does this really have to do with the Clintons though?

Nothing.

USe your nous. Connect the dots.. Where else was he.. He went to Saudi. What happened there..

a reply to: Skyfloating

Uh Podesta?

Where has he been implicated with child abuse? Besides hack conspiracy theorists...

Thought you were smarter than this Sky. You’ve been sucked into the right wing conspiracy hyperbole.

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Skyfloating

Uh Podesta?

Where has he been implicated with child abuse? Besides hack conspiracy theorists...

Thought you were smarter than this Sky. You’ve been sucked into the right wing conspiracy hyperbole.

Here is an example..

How prog-guru John Podesta isn't household name as world class underage sex slave op cover-upperer defending unspeakable dregs escapes me.

One of his last tweets. Late journalist Andrew Breitbart 2011. He died shortly aftet this tweet. Funny that. His coroner also died suspicious circumstances the day after finishing his report from arsenic.. Funny that.

Wake up Chadders.

The coffee is brewing.

a reply to: purplemer

Yet no charges?

Anyway, this is just deflection.

Where’s the evidence against Getz?

How come 2 years before Getz was even a board member did kids get assaulted?

How does that work if he’s part of some big over arching child abuse ring? Heard about it and thought he’d get in on it...by getting the teachers to do it???

Uh what?

Like I said before, all this fantasy nonsense dulls out the real stuff, why can’t you smell what your shovelling?

a reply to: eisegesis

Sheesh, how many shady things revolve around that woman, anyway? Another connection involving child abuse, too...huh....

This is one deep swamp.