It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: mbkennel
a reply to: M5xaz
The examples of Mercury vs Venus are about the physical mechanisms where the atmosphere influences the temperature in a profound way.
Notice how the denialists don't really talk about physics? For the scientists, the physics are central to all aspects of earth science from the beginning (in all fields, far before global warming was a policy issue) and are the unifying, predictive bedrock of truth.
Precisely from a physics perspective, there is no comparison between Earth and Venusbecausethe atmospheres are so different.
I have made fluid models and tested them,including under turbulent conditions.
originally posted by: mbkennel
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: mbkennel
a reply to: M5xaz
The examples of Mercury vs Venus are about the physical mechanisms where the atmosphere influences the temperature in a profound way.
Notice how the denialists don't really talk about physics? For the scientists, the physics are central to all aspects of earth science from the beginning (in all fields, far before global warming was a policy issue) and are the unifying, predictive bedrock of truth.
Precisely from a physics perspective, there is no comparison between Earth and Venusbecausethe atmospheres are so different.
The laws of physics are the same on Earth as Venus.
I have made fluid models and tested them,including under turbulent conditions.
What difference does the composition of the atmosphere make to the surface temperature of a planet, and why, and how would one compute that?