Vegas timeline changes again

So the timeline has changed. The authorities are now claiming he began shooting at campos just before opening fire on the crowd. Not after and not 6 minutes before. I am tempted to ask what the hell, but when you consider the pressure the investigators are under to get answers now rather than later, it is understandable things may change as new facts come to light in what is an ongoing investigation. Or cover up. Depending on what your opinion is.

Las Vegas authorities have revised the timeline of the mass shooting, saying Stephen Paddock shot a hotel security guard around the time he began firing on the crowd, not six minutes earlier.

link

Wasn't this announced several days ago now? It was the hotel (MGM/Mandalay) that stated Campos was shot at about 60 seconds before Paddock opened fire on the crowd

a reply to: sg1642


Its all semantics.


We are not privy to the truth, that's why the cluster# of reporting, its all part of the game to continue the divide.

originally posted by: TheOnlyBilko
Wasn't this announced several days ago now? It was the hotel (MGM/Mandalay) that stated Campos was shot at about 60 seconds before Paddock opened fire on the crowd

It may have been but I only saw it today and I haven't seen it posted on here.

MGM said that time "was derived from a Mandalay Bay report manually created after the fact without the benefit of information we now have. We are now confident that the time stated in this report is not accurate."

I wonder who done that?
I'm sure it was TOTALLY unintentional.

the official story will continue to be modified as long as points surface that would reveal the real culprits of the attack....


see the first 3 minutes of this YT video: www.youtube.com...
(the forced Ad at the start is a result of low gravitas of the video account standing...other ultra left & Sharia sites are circumventing this...)


also see this NGO-> www.understandingthethreat.com...
"(this NGO is bound to be deemed a Domestic Terror Org., is my guess...)

Finding the truth is not the government's goal, but suppressing the truth is. It's just like San Bernardino, Sandy Hook, and too many others.

Stephen Paddock must be a zombie. Shooting Campos and over 50 people while dead with half his brain gone.

I'm 90% sure Paddock was dead before the shooting started.

BTW, my theory, FWIW, is that there were teams of shooters trying to corral the 22,000 towards the aviation fuel tanks and then ignite them with incendiary rounds from either a .308 of .50 sniper rifle (could be where the Ruger he purchased went). If I were a terrorist, which I ain't, that's what I'd do...


just sayin'...

originally posted by: TheOnlyBilko
Wasn't this announced several days ago now? It was the hotel (MGM/Mandalay) that stated Campos was shot at about 60 seconds before Paddock opened fire on the crowd

From hero that drew fire and attention of the shooter ending the shooting at the crowd, to six minutes before the shooting at the crowd began, to 40 seconds before shooting at the crowd to your 60 seconds...

Quite a challenge for the creative writers involved here. Getting the timeline and narrative that best fits the reality they need to create can't be easy when parties involved, and entities with significant interests keep moving things around.

It's a shame the Hotel and Casino didn't invest in some quality video camera equipment to view the events with, so they could have a perfect replay of events and timelines. Security is much better at your local circle K.

You guys seem to be in dire need for some conspiracy.
I don't see where any of the minute on the hour talk has any relevance or mystery

originally posted by: network dude
It's a shame the Hotel and Casino didn't invest in some quality video camera equipment to view the events with, so they could have a perfect replay of events and timelines. Security is much better at your local circle K.

This is what I've been waiting for all along. The best camera security system is in play here, undoubtedly, casinos don't # around, but yet, no video evidence of anything from the hotel.

Important? if any part of evidence, etc is a lie then how can any of it be trusted. Which is true and which isn't.

a reply to: Rezlooper

I doubt they would release the footage, but if you can't watch it and determine a verified time line based on time stamp, I'm thinking you aren't in the right job.