It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: Aliensun
I raise your "calling the kettle black" to maybe YOU are calling the kettle black!
Men 65 to 75 are very dangerous. It's a very difficult part of life. Their body is failing. Fears about retirement prevent them from sleeping every night. Their children are gone. Their relationship with their wife may not be very good. Job prospects suck. NO PENSION. 401K is more like a 201K or even a 101K. They have tons of debt from mortgage or paying for kids education. These men may become desperate and insane. So expect to see more mass shootings over the next few years. I'm really surprise it doesn't happen a lot more in this country.
Fears about retirement prevent them from sleeping every night.
The definition of inanity is making an argument with something someone else never said. I never said people over 65 were responsible for all the mass murders. Are you capable of hearing what you read?
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: dfnj2015I'm that age djnj and I do not disagree with a lot of what you suggest though as has been pointed out and to which you agree, these considerations are best not held to in sweeping generalities.
Paddock's brother, Eric Paddock of Orlando, Florida, told CNN he was blindsided by the news.
"He was my brother and it's like an asteroid fell out of the sky," he said.
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: DrChandra
Not to nit-pick Dr, your definition of insanity is the generally accepted definition of insanity. However the word OP used in that quote was inanity, which by it's definition of silliness or senselessness does fit that reply.
The definition of inanity is making an argument with something someone else never said.
A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument which was not advanced by that opponent.