Did Ancient Humans Coexisted with Dinosaurs?

originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: StephenLeClaire

You need to prove why you "do not trust it" and why we should care what you think neighbour. What are your qualifications?

I was going to educate myself as he suggested, but I could not find Homer Simpson's school of radio-carbon dating anywhere online.

a reply to: Dudemo5

I thought it was Peter Griffen's Polythechnique? Or perhaps Ren and Stimpy's college

Quite simply my fellow "Druid" seems awfully like a creationist here

a reply to: JohnnyCanuck

In University we did experiments in RadioChem, including C14 dating. I am pretty sure these individuals don't know C12 from C13 fom C14, and how to use the latter two

originally posted by: StephenLeClaire
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck

I am aware of how all of these things prove its inaccuracy. I know exactly how "calibration" works. That's precisely why I don't trust it. Do some homework.

I am hosting a presentation on radiocarbon modelling later this month. You could get all your questions answered by people much smarter than me. PM me if you are in Ontario.

originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: TheLotLizard

No it was not recorded until Aristotle. You confuse the two things

Its pretty clear Sailors knew that.

Again you used a fallacious argument to try and justify something.

I say again. There was at least 65 million years of evolution to get in the way of your fantasy. I say at least, as some rather early dinosaurs are supposed to be depicted. Quite simply. There was more than enough time, for anything dinosaur like to have changed. Unless we are talking immortal Dinosaurs that is

IS that what you are suggesting?

So yeah, nah. Not a chance.

I lean to it being more likely large birds like the Moa. en.wikipedia.org...

Again... you failed to read correctly... I said it was PROPOSED and widely accepted in Greece by Aristotle in 350 B.C.

It was brought to light in 500 B.C. By a man called Pythagoras by showing that the sun and moon were round and thus should be the Earth. and then further evidence was brought about in 450 B.C. by a man named Anaxagoras when he shown the shadow from the earth during the eclipse was round.

Your theory is just as valid as the theory that at least one dinosaur could have been living up to a million or closer years ago. New fossils are found every day. Yet you probably think every dinosaur were 30 foot long behemoths when some dinosaurs were mere inches long.

Your ignorance just astounds me.

a reply to: TheLotLizard

Again you are avoiding you used a known fallacy, to show "proof" of a fantasy.

You are diverting the discussion from the point of the thread, to hide the fact the premise is pure and utter male bovine fecal matter.

You are implying things I have not said.

All these are common techniques of logical fallacy.

I've said, there is no proof dinosaurs (in the form of dinosaurs) survived.

I said, the survivors evolved. We know this, DNA sequencing has helped prove this is most likely.

Do these look like dinosaurs?

No.

QED no dinosaurs do no longer exist, and have not for many tens of millions of years.

I will reassess when evidence is shown.

Till that time.

My answer remains. NO, humans and dinosaurs did not co-exist.

a reply to: TheLotLizard

Again you are avoiding you used a known fallacy, to show "proof" of a fantasy.

You are diverting the discussion from the point of the thread, to hide the fact the premise is pure and utter male bovine fecal matter.

You are implying things I have not said.

All these are common techniques of logical fallacy.

I've said, there is no proof dinosaurs (in the form of dinosaurs) survived.

I said, the survivors evolved. We know this, DNA sequencing has helped prove this is most likely.

Do these look like dinosaurs?

No.

QED no dinosaurs do no longer exist, and have not for many tens of millions of years.

I will reassess when evidence is shown.

Till that time.

My answer remains. NO, humans and dinosaurs did not co-exist.

originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: TheLotLizard

Again you are avoiding you used a known fallacy, to show "proof" of a fantasy.

You are diverting the discussion from the point of the thread, to hide the fact the premise is pure and utter male bovine fecal matter.

You are implying things I have not said.

All these are common techniques of logical fallacy.

I've said, there is no proof dinosaurs (in the form of dinosaurs) survived.

I said, the survivors evolved. We know this, DNA sequencing has helped prove this is most likely.

Do these look like dinosaurs?

No.

QED no dinosaurs do no longer exist, and have not for many tens of millions of years.

I will reassess when evidence is shown.

Till that time.

My answer remains. NO, humans and dinosaurs did not co-exist.

It astounds me that there is someone out there as ignorant as you putting a star on your post. You lost all credibility when you said you're a pagan.

Until next time. Learn to read

Peace.

a reply to: TheLotLizard


Oh prey tell why did my faith cause me to loose all credibility? No go for it I like when people resort to ad hominem and non sequitur attacks.

You need to take your own advise neighbor.

a reply to: TheLotLizard

wait... hes lost all credibility because hes not Christian... thats what you actually mean

You seem to believe this is a Christian forum

believe me its very far from it

a reply to: Akragon

Or perchance because I am a scientist and not an atheist ..... who knows with these types?

originally posted by: Phantom423

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: Phantom423

originally posted by: Gothmog
I love it when folks that dont know a hill o beans about the topic chime in with just a no.
There are ancient cave paintings that show what apparently are dinosaurs. The way we picture them today.
Can someone explain that ? I cant.
Imagination ? Could anyone here imagine what a brontosaurus looked like without ever have seen them in pictures ?
It could be possible , but highly unlikely.
We havent found remains of early man along with a dinosaur ? How much of the world has archeologists uncovered ? All of it ?
Hades , they cant agree on where man started. Not even modern man .
Some folks keep such a closed mind , nothing new can get in .

And the point is................?

This^^^^
What a prime example of my last words on the post.

Oki Doki!

And the point is................?

No , not its not okey dokey
That type of inane remark is laughable...

a reply to: Noinden

your willingness to regurgitate the paradigms as though they are fact without any thinking on your part, and your incorrect use of loose versus lose is what lost your credibility...

Jaden

a reply to: Phantom423

Oh please, do tell what dating method is used on "65 million year old" rocks? Is it the strata that it's in? or the fossils that are found within the rock...lol...

It sure as hell isn't potassium argon or any other radiological dating method. None are capable of going back far enough...Interesting how the dating isn't falsifiable...lol...

Jaden

originally posted by: peter vlar
a reply to: Gothmog

If it's about dinosaurs, its about paleontology. If it's about humans and their day to day lives and what organisms they interacted with, then it's about Anthropology. None of it is about archaeology aside from people attempting to incorporate their own false interpretations of certain archaeological finds. See, there aren't any archaeological finds demonstrating humans coexisting with dinosaurs. It's wishful thinking and fantasy for the willfully ignorant and desperate.

Feel free to work on that reading comprehension you seem so fond of. But since you are so concerned with recent archaeological finds and others keeps my up with them, you must have some recent citations handy for us to peruse, right? Or have you got nothing's but contempt to share with the class?

Ok , you just concentrated on one word of my original post. Did I not say cave drawings from early man ?
That is the failure of reading comprehension I spoke of
Buh bye now
I dont waste my time bantering words . I cut through to the topic.
Evidently , you are

a reply to: Noinden

Really? and what defines time? Has time fluctuated in the past? Has gravity? After all time is relative and in respect to our experience of time and the oscillation of the atoms of decaying matter, Gravity is the most relevant concern.

So tell me, how do we know that gravity hasn't fluctuated in the past, especially the distant past?

Jaden

a reply to: Noinden

As is thinking for yourselves for your type and actually, real science and not paradigmical, contrived science I would be willing to bet is done more by your opposition than by you.

Jaden

a reply to: Noinden

Actually, they don't agree on them originating in Africa any more....lol

Jaden

Why would it matter? Why would anyone, dealing with a "modern", survival, give a rat's a**? I'm willing to bet they did! I'm pretty sure the 30.06 did them in! Can't say for sure. But stupid stories, seem to have stopped around the time,.. the 30.06 came into "casual" use... Could be me, uneducated me, just misreading history... But I have "faith"! Jesus cares as much as I do, about the subject.