It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MasterAtArms
a reply to: 1656hrs
see the problem is not with the content of this thread, the issue arose when you got prissy with us because we questioned you use of arbitrary rules regarding your numerology interpretation.
It was you yourself that steered the thread. If you take a look at my original reply I simply stated my opinion without any other intent. You decided to take it down a path you ultimately didn't like.
originally posted by: 1656hrs
originally posted by: MasterAtArms
a reply to: 1656hrs
see the problem is not with the content of this thread, the issue arose when you got prissy with us because we questioned you use of arbitrary rules regarding your numerology interpretation.
It was you yourself that steered the thread. If you take a look at my original reply I simply stated my opinion without any other intent. You decided to take it down a path you ultimately didn't like.
I just said it requires belief to work.
You went on to say that if something requires belief to work then I was fooling myself.
THEN you joined in with member noonebutme, you yourself equating some of what I'm putting forth to something you describe as bull faeces.
Fortunately for me, anyone reading this can check the posts and the order they're posted in for themselves.
Unfortunately for you, you seem unable to engage your brain before you post.
have really (actually, really) looked into numerology I came to the conclusion you can use it to support literally anything you want it to with whatever arbitrary rules you wish to implement
originally posted by: MasterAtArms
originally posted by: 1656hrs
originally posted by: MasterAtArms
a reply to: 1656hrs
see the problem is not with the content of this thread, the issue arose when you got prissy with us because we questioned you use of arbitrary rules regarding your numerology interpretation.
It was you yourself that steered the thread. If you take a look at my original reply I simply stated my opinion without any other intent. You decided to take it down a path you ultimately didn't like.
I just said it requires belief to work.
You went on to say that if something requires belief to work then I was fooling myself.
THEN you joined in with member noonebutme, you yourself equating some of what I'm putting forth to something you describe as bull faeces.
Fortunately for me, anyone reading this can check the posts and the order they're posted in for themselves.
Unfortunately for you, you seem unable to engage your brain before you post.
If you don't want to hear criticism, you don't have to engage with people who will naturally question anything presented without any kind of proof. My first post was actually on page 2...
have really (actually, really) looked into numerology I came to the conclusion you can use it to support literally anything you want it to with whatever arbitrary rules you wish to implement
You didn't have to respond to it, but choosing to do so entered a dialog which naturally progressed in a way you didn't like simply because people disagree with you.
If you cant handle that, don't post. simples.
originally posted by: 1656hrs
originally posted by: MasterAtArms
originally posted by: 1656hrs
originally posted by: MasterAtArms
a reply to: 1656hrs
see the problem is not with the content of this thread, the issue arose when you got prissy with us because we questioned you use of arbitrary rules regarding your numerology interpretation.
It was you yourself that steered the thread. If you take a look at my original reply I simply stated my opinion without any other intent. You decided to take it down a path you ultimately didn't like.
I just said it requires belief to work.
You went on to say that if something requires belief to work then I was fooling myself.
THEN you joined in with member noonebutme, you yourself equating some of what I'm putting forth to something you describe as bull faeces.
Fortunately for me, anyone reading this can check the posts and the order they're posted in for themselves.
Unfortunately for you, you seem unable to engage your brain before you post.
If you don't want to hear criticism, you don't have to engage with people who will naturally question anything presented without any kind of proof. My first post was actually on page 2...
have really (actually, really) looked into numerology I came to the conclusion you can use it to support literally anything you want it to with whatever arbitrary rules you wish to implement
You didn't have to respond to it, but choosing to do so entered a dialog which naturally progressed in a way you didn't like simply because people disagree with you.
If you cant handle that, don't post. simples.
Yes, your first post was on page 2.
It was exactly as you've just quoted.
My reply was that it takes belief to work.
Your reply was that if it requires belief to work I was fooling myself.
Then you replied to member noonebutme, likening my numerology to something you described as bovine excrement.
I'm not enjoying repeating myself, but please don't think that I'm not enjoying making you look like a fool.
Last year I received a phone call in which the only words spoken from the other end were "You're mine". This was slightly disconcerting to say the least, and the voice was strange, discernible as neither male nor female.
At the beginning of the call there was no sound, I thought this suspicious so I pressed 'record' on my phone, the icon turned red as it should when recording but upon checking my recordings there was no file present.
The time of the call and the number that called were also of immediate interest to me, as both encoded the number 666 quite straightforwardly.The time of the call was 16.56 (two sixes and the third six being the five and one added) which I noticed was the only minute out of 1440 in a day, to encode 666.
The telephone number itself also had three concurrent sixes within it.
With some trepidation I rang the number to speak to whoever it was... Invalid number. The telephone number doesn't exist, it just beeped and cut off.
So I analysed the number symbolically (omitting the zeroes as always) along with the time of the call:
1×8×1×9×7×6×6×6×1 × 1×6×5×6 = 19595520
originally posted by: BigBangWasAnEcho
Pointless number obsession = demonic possession.
Satan has got you