Flat earth theory?

a reply to: turbonium1

Sad to see you use a blatant lie. Ignore the services and data provided by thousands of satellites. You have no explanation for what is broadcasting from the recorded positions of satellites. You have no explanation for new items in orbit that can be seen with the unaided eye like the international space station. The addition of the international space station resulting in the third brightness object in the night sky, that should be a big deal concerning the firmament. What’s the firmament’s explanation for the new third brightest object in the night sky?


originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: turbonium1
They always mention where to see things fly in 'orbit', but for some reason, have never once mentioned where to see them going upward, towards 'orbit'!

LOL, indeed!

False argument by you....


Again..

a reply to: turbonium1

You

I've never even seen a rocket fly up to airplane altitudes, and neither have you, or anyone else, seen it.

What is it with you and blatant lies?

originally posted by: sapien82
a reply to: Akragon

I was gonna post that one !

here are JAXA rockets launching 7 satellites

funny thing about this whole flat earth , we can lead a horse to water
but it will only drink when its ready!

A launch that placed these items into space.

Japan’s Epsilon rocket launches seven tech demo satellites

spaceflightnow.com...

Seven small satellites launched aboard a Japanese Epsilon rocket Friday, including a diverse suite of tech demo payloads and a spacecraft designed to create an artificial meteor shower next year that developers say should be visible with the naked eye.

We are placing so much junk in space, it might “ruin” the night sky.

SpaceX's Starlink Could Change The Night Sky Forever, And Astronomers Are Not Happy

www.forbes.com... 59b6

“The potential tragedy of a mega-constellation like Starlink is that for the rest of humanity it changes how the night sky looks,” says Ronald Drimmel from the Turin Astrophysical Observatory in Italy. “Starlink, and other mega constellations, would ruin the sky for everyone on the planet.”

a reply to: turbonium1

We know you contradict yourself, use blatant falsehoods, and hoax material.

You

Planes cannot fly to the wall, nor a blimp, nor anything else can do it.

The weather is very extreme, apparently, all of the time, flight is not possible. Other means of travel don't work, either.


Why do you keep asking the same questions I've already answered?

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Then contradicting yourself, you post a video that shows a glacier in a fly over you falsely claim is the “ice wall” ? Whole heaping pile of steaming blatant falsehoods.

Why would you post “The weather is very extreme, apparently, all of the time, flight is not possible.“. Then post a video claiming to show the ice wall? And then it turns out the video is a hoax statement on your behalf?

Here's one map from the New York Journal, in 1897...

wiki.tfes.org...:New_York_journal_map_(1897).png


Here's a video of the ice wall...

www.youtube.com...


Many more maps, videos, and images are available, if you want to confirm it yourself.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

how are “Many more maps, videos, and images are available” if “The weather is very extreme, apparently, all of the time, flight is not possible. Other means of travel don't work, either.“