It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: intrptr
Life is out there and here we just don't understand it.
Life on Mars is not "Zero", a very low chance (now, currently), yes, zero, no.
originally posted by: FauxMulder
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
You've got these idiots that deny the holocaust. The truth is after the allies liberated Europe, Dr. Mengele moved his operation to Mars, at the Marschwitz camp. Biggest conspiracy that no one knows about.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Kandinsky
The in crowd knows theres no life, they sell us the search for life to keep the money flowing.
"The in crowd" assumes that there is no life on Mars based on information derived from what they know about Earth and how life functions here.
That is a lot different than knowing something. I, too, assume that there are no living organisms on Mars at the moment, but that doesn't mean that my assumption is without fault and will not be proven wrong in the future.
But to be fair, the search for life does include evidence of previous life, no matter how microscopic, and that is what keeps me interested because of the implications, both biblical and otherwise, that it would bring to the table--living organisms would blow possibilities out of the water.
"The in crowd" assumes that there is no life on Mars based on information derived from what they know about Earth and how life functions here.
That is a lot different than knowing something. I, too, assume that there are no living organisms on Mars at the moment, but that doesn't mean that my assumption is without fault and will not be proven wrong in the future.
But to be fair, the search for life does include evidence of previous life, no matter how microscopic, and that is what keeps me interested because of the implications, both biblical and otherwise, that it would bring to the table--living organisms would blow possibilities out of the water.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: SlapMonkey
Given that the 'accepted Origins' of life here includes copious amounts of liquid water, that alone precludes life on Mars.
To claim that something is impossible just because we have not observed it scientifically is quite the antithesis of science, IMO.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: SlapMonkey
Personally the next dimension is all around us and is full of sentient life, and yah we are as blind to that as a 2D "flatlander" is to the concept of 'Up'.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: SlapMonkey
"Flat Stanley" isn't truly flat.
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: SlapMonkey
"Flat Stanley" isn't truly flat.
Ummm...yes, I knew that. It was meant to be humorous
Isn't Mathville the next dimension?
originally posted by: Kandinsky
Here's a beauty posted by Zorgon a few years ago.
CREDIT: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona.
There are no trees or other vegetation on Mars. Lots of 'looks like' and 'could be' imagery that our brains trick us into thinking are trees, tracks or old foundations. A lichen would be amazing enough and, so far, even a hardy life-form like that hasn't been found.