Sessions will testify in open hearing Tuesday before Senate Intelligence Committee

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Perfectenemy

I never said or suggested what I thought the outcome of the hearing will be for Trump.

Of course.

a reply to: Perfectenemy

You are welcome to prove me wrong and quote my words, otherwise I suggest you stop as this isn't the mud pit.

Didn't they just have a MSM release that Sessions did not want a public meeting with them? I tell you, MSM makes so much stuff up we never know what is going on if we read or listen to what they are saying.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

cool
he will get to explain in detail why he approved the deputy ag's recommendation to 86 comey
may as well have the deputy ag in at the same time, as he was the one who actually "defamed" comey in his review

he can also clear up how obstruction could occur if ot was not reported per procedure

Sessions is a career politician and if he has to rat out Trump to save his job security, he will.

Trump is off the rails and loves to say "you're fired" he has no loyalty in the WH.
Trump loves to humiliate his staff in front of others. And if you don't allow his bullying tactics...."you're fired"

Now Trump is going to fire Priebus....

www.rawstory.com...

www.usnews.com...

Now even rank and file GOPers are afraid that they will associated with Trump and are looking for escape routes.


www.nytimes.com...

a reply to: shooterbrody

I'm actually curious about those details as well.

I for one sincerely appreciate the adult way in which "Trumpkins" is used in this context. it shows not only depth of character, but an overwhelming amount of confidence in the moral superiority that obviously exists.

It's witty beyond comprehension and is only overshadowed by the person who used it's ability to show intelligence when posting.

Bravo, well played indeed.

originally posted by: network dude
I for one sincerely appreciate the adult way in which "Trumpkins" is used in this context. it shows not only depth of character, but an overwhelming amount of confidence in the moral superiority that obviously exists.

It's witty beyond comprehension and is only overshadowed by the person who used it's ability to show intelligence when posting.

Bravo, well played indeed.

.I love well written sarcasm and yours is exceptional!

originally posted by: network dude
I for one sincerely appreciate the adult way in which "Trumpkins" is used in this context. it shows not only depth of character, but an overwhelming amount of confidence in the moral superiority that obviously exists.

It's witty beyond comprehension and is only overshadowed by the person who used it's ability to show intelligence when posting.

Bravo, well played indeed.

Just shows a lack of maturity and a lack of confidence in their argument so they use it to deflect away from the rest of the nonsense in their post.

originally posted by: Middleoftheroad

originally posted by: network dude
I for one sincerely appreciate the adult way in which "Trumpkins" is used in this context. it shows not only depth of character, but an overwhelming amount of confidence in the moral superiority that obviously exists.

It's witty beyond comprehension and is only overshadowed by the person who used it's ability to show intelligence when posting.

Bravo, well played indeed.

Just shows a lack of maturity and a lack of confidence in their argument so they use it to deflect away from the rest of the nonsense in their post.

We can take pride in that the Conservative Trump supporters never stoop to that level of name calling and disrespect of the opposition for purely partisan reasons; Our Christian values simply won't allow it....

a reply to: Krazysh0t

I don't respect him; you don't have to respect him. I didn't respect Obama.

And there's more! You don't have to respect the office and you don't have to have any particular allegiance to the man or the office. The US Government is a crock-O-#hit! Its utterly useless and the tools involved are useless.

Don't let anyone tell you you have to respect any of these people or the offices they hold.

originally posted by: rickymouse
Didn't they just have a MSM release that Sessions did not want a public meeting with them? I tell you, MSM makes so much stuff up we never know what is going on if we read or listen to what they are saying.

Sessions canceled his appearance with the house and Senate appropriation committee. A completely different matter.

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: Middleoftheroad

originally posted by: network dude
I for one sincerely appreciate the adult way in which "Trumpkins" is used in this context. it shows not only depth of character, but an overwhelming amount of confidence in the moral superiority that obviously exists.

It's witty beyond comprehension and is only overshadowed by the person who used it's ability to show intelligence when posting.

Bravo, well played indeed.

Just shows a lack of maturity and a lack of confidence in their argument so they use it to deflect away from the rest of the nonsense in their post.

We can take pride in that the Conservative Trump supporters never stoop to that level of name calling and disrespect of the opposition for purely partisan reasons; Our Christian values simply won't allow it....

I'm not a christian and everyone has a right to say what they want. Doesn't matter to me either way. Just don't expect me to take someone serious throwing around words like Trumpkin when they're in full triggered mode.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Breaking?

Hardly.

This was already being discussed 2 days ago and is currently featured on the main page.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: TonyS

I don't.