Hoax Exposed, no effort to renegotiate Paris Agreement.

a reply to: Liquesence

I hear you but the reason its not these things is simply because US has deep pockets and this problem is being seen as solution socialistic.

a reply to: Liquesence

Your quotation says 25%. Earlier, you said it was 40%, so which is it? Cause my data says 11% or less.

Your data says no such thing. My three sources say between 25 - 50 percent of lumber production is destined for electrical generation. Your data says 11 percent of overall electrical generation is biomass. Two entirely different categories.

I'm downplaying the BS that a large percentage of renewable biomass is from purposefully cutting down forests.

What part don't you get? Timber production is being used to generate electricity. Deforestation that will spread to third world countries. Subsidized, all of it by the people.
Educate yourself, read some papers on the subject
Renewable energy cost analysis

Forest Biomass for NW Europe

Current and Potential Biomass Forest Usage Tasmania

a reply to: Liquesence

I used to think that way. Then i saw that the US thumping its chest as the steward left us naive to the corrupt politicians and corporate money grabbers who have been playing us for our money. Our govt threw money all over the world along with weapons in a plan filled with deception and death. Some plan. Look at the result. the world is in more chaos then ever and the rich are richer. All at the expense of hard working people like us.

The Paris Accord IMO was a piece of the bigger globalization movement that been going on for at least 30 years.

Globalization would be cool if it was done with a smart plan by honest people from all the major countries with the support of the people. Until theres a smart plan with honest people behind it that the majority support I dont see how its possible.

a reply to: gortex

Here's a short 6 minute video, Myron Ebell answers some questions as to what direction the administration has promised to go. Ebell was on the EPA Transition team. The transition team produced an agency action plan for the administration. Ebell tells us in this video what Trump promised to do as a candidate: WIthdraw from the Paris agreement, defund the UNFCCC, at the EPA he will withdraw or repeal all the Obama administrations rules regarding greenhouse gas emissions, including the Clean Power Plan, Undo the Climate action plan and more. Again, get ready for the media and the progressives to lose their minds. Getting rid of the Paris Agreement was just the first step.


Longer Video of Ebell speaking.

a reply to: Greven

They don't have to. They can keep on with it without US assistance. What makes you think they are forced to?

a reply to: Liquesence

In 80 years this is projected to change temperature by .2 degrees C. Sorry, your argument lost here.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

hmmm, the Green Climate slush fund wanted funding of 100 billion per annum by 2020.

Works out to 40 trillion dollars per degree of change, what a bargain!

a reply to: D8Tee

And that's only if everyone did what they were supposed to do. When does that ever happen?

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: D8Tee

Germany is so close to having a working fusion reactor they don't care about fossil fuels anymore.

I've heard that story since 1975, sorry, not buying.

When I see one in commercial operation, get back to me.