It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Excallibacca
Since your link doesn't work and I don't really want to enter the link into my address bar when I don't even know what the link is leading me to, could you clarify what the link leads to for me?
originally posted by: ClovenSky
I found an interesting conspiracy theory that questioned if Nehemiah was actually describing the Kremlin in his tales of Jerusalem. That it was later changed and ultimately cemented by Scaliger in his chronology.
There were mentions of bitter cold and snow in the original stories of gatherings in the courtyards.
originally posted by: ARM1968
a reply to: galien8
It could be argued that Roslyn Chapel is the third temple as it was built by The Templars/Masons to the exact dimensions of the first temple, Solomons.
However I think if the prophecy holds any water at all then the temple will need to be rebuilt on its old foundations and Israel would burn to the ground before that happened.
The Dome of the Rock is an Islamic shrine located on the Temple Mount in the Old City of Jerusalem, which had been built on the site of Herod's Temple.
The site's great significance for Muslims derives from traditions connecting it to the creation of the world and to the belief that the Prophet Muhammad's Night Journey to heaven started from the rock at the center of the structure. The rock also bears great significance for Jews as the site of Abraham's attempted sacrifice of his son.
originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: galien8
Therein lies the issue and main problem: Rebuilding that which all 3 Major Religions will never allow on the same spot. Not in our lifetimes......
SO: Prophecies predicting the future, could be true, could not be true
originally posted by: Seede
a reply to: galien8
Mark_13:32
But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father.
originally posted by: ntech
a reply to: Seede
Just thought I would point out that you are taking 13-32 out of context there. It's not the Apocalypse Jesus Christ was talking about in that verse. It was verse 13-30. The start of the generation. And I would pose this. The "generation" has already started. Why? The rebirth of Israel in 1948. If that was a predicted event as I think it was with the valley of bones prophesy in Ezekiel 37 then that means it was a fig leaf from the fig tree parable. The 2nd fig leaf but a fig leaf nonetheless.
The generation is 69 years old now at a minimum.
originally posted by: ntech
a reply to: galien8
Nonsense? Try reading the prophesy without the verse numbers.
Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When his branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is nigh:
So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors.
Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.
Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.
But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.
But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
Read in context he is saying the day and hour of the start of the generation. And if an end time event has happened as I explained above then the generation has already begun.