Twitter Suspends WND For Seth Rich Story

Social media lockdown commencing.
WMD tweeted and got themselves deleted.


Link

Oh, and how about the accusations from the Seth Rich family of Kim Dotcom trying to hack Seth's email? Yea right, cuz that's what Kim Dotcom is going to do at this point in time. You have to ask yourself, was this Seth Rich's family saying this, or was it the DNC handler Brad Baumann....



Oh, and lets get Hannity fired while we're at it.
Nobody is to speak of Seth Rich ever again....

To find the truth simply find out what the media won't let you talk about.

Jealous bastards !

Twitter bows to a lot of trash.

Shattered Nerves !!

They've suspended multiple accounts. They've been slowly trying to turn that into another liberal social media hellhole for awhile, through censorship, just like almost all social media.

It's the Washington Post should be permanently suspended (that's forever!) from existence for attempted poisoning the minds of the public

The WaPo has gone the way of MTV, just way more toxic to society let alone journalism.

As for WND, maybe suspend them too!

a reply to: D8Tee

based on title of thread:

GOOD

a reply to: D8Tee

I dont know why they are trying to silence everyone. Way too late for that. Everyone already put the pieces together.

[snipped] This is ridiculous because all WND did was report Wheeler's statement with added speculation. Exactly what the MSM are doing in relation to the alleged Trump/Russia collusion. At least WND named the source, whereas the MSM almost never does.

a reply to: six67seven

It's the Washington Post should be permanently suspended (that's forever!) from existence for attempted poisoning the minds of the public

Special Counsel needs to look at media collusion, it's out of control.
CNN told us it was illegal to read the wikileaks ffs and that we would have to rely upon CNN themselves!
These reporters and networks have been named in the WikiLeaks to have colluded with the DNC or Hillary campaign during the 2016 election cycle:
​
ABC – Cecilia Vega
ABC - David Muir
ABC – Diane Sawyer
ABC – George Stephanoplous
ABC – Jon Karl
ABC – Liz Kreutz
AP – Julie Pace
AP – Ken Thomas
AP – Lisa Lerer
AURN – April Ryan
Bloomberg – Jennifer Epstein
Bloomberg – John Heillman
Bloomberg/MSNBC – Jonathan Alter
Bloomberg – Mark Halperin
Buzzfeed – Ben Smith
Buzzfeed – Ruby Cramer
CBS – Gayle King
CBS – John Dickerson
CBS – Norah O'Donnell
CBS – Steve Chagaris
CBS – Vicki Gordon
CNBC – John Harwood
CNN – Brianna Keilar
CNN – Dan Merica
CNN – David Chailan
CNN – Erin Burnett
CNN – Gloria Borger
CNN – Jake Tapper
CNN – Jeff Zeleny
CNN - Jeff Zucker
CNN – John Berman
CNN – Kate Bouldan
CNN – Maria Cardona
CNN – Mark Preston
CNN – Sam Feist
Daily Beast – Jackie Kucinich
GPG – Mike Feldman
HuffPo – Amanda Terkel
HuffPo – Arianna Huffington
HuffPo – Sam Stein
HuffPo – Whitney Snyder
LAT – Evan Handler
LAT – Mike Memoli
McClatchy – Anita Kumar
MORE – Betsy Fisher Martin
MSNBC – Alex Seitz-Wald
MSNBC – Alex Wagner
MSNBC – Andrea Mitchell
MSNBC - Beth Fouhy
MSNBC – Ed Schultz
MSNBC – Joe Scarborough
MSNBC – Mika Brzezinski
MSNBC – Phil Griffin
MSNBC – Rachel Maddow
MSNBC – Rachel Racusen
MSNBC – Thomas Roberts
National Journal – Emily Schultheis
NBC – Chuck Todd
NBC – Mark Murray
NBC – Savannah Gutherie
New Yorker – David Remnick
New Yorker – Ryan Liza
NPR – Mike Oreskes
NPR – Tamara Keith
NY Post – Geofe Earl
NYT – Amy Chozik
NYT – Carolyn Ryan
NYT – Gail Collins
NYT – John Harwoodje
NYT – Jonathan Martin
NYT – Maggie Haberman
NYT – Pat Healey
PBS – Charlie Rose
People – Sandra Sobieraj Westfall
Politico – Annie Karni
Politico – Gabe Debenedetti
Politico – Glenn Thrush
Politico – Kenneth Vogel
Politico – Mike Allen
Reuters – Amanda Becker
Tina Brown – Tina Brown
The Hill – Amie Parnes
Univision – Maria-Elena Salinas
Vice – Alyssa Mastramonoco
Vox – Jon Allen
WaPo – Anne Gearan
WaPo – Greg Sargent
WSJ – Laura Meckler
WSJ – Peter Nicholas
WSJ – Colleen McCain Nelson
Yahoo – Matt Bai

a reply to: Idreamofme

they are discouraging the nonsense inflammatory dissemination of lies, especially those that are tasteless and ridiculous

would members think it was strange if The Onion was taken seriously? or would it be okay here?

a reply to: D8Tee

"If you tell the truth; have a foot in the stirrup." - Turkish Proverb

Gotta love these anti-free speech liberals.

So his family, brainwashed or a big check in their bank account. Seems like someone has gotten to them, one way or another.

They haven't mentioned seeing any actual evidence, have they?

originally posted by: Idreamofme
a reply to: D8Tee

I dont know why they are trying to silence everyone. Way too late for that. Everyone already put the pieces together.

In crazy Pizzaland!

a reply to: roadgravel

Maybe the parents should watch the Dutch television interview with Assange where he all but calls out Seth Rich as the leaker.

Julian Assange: Whistleblowers go to significant efforts to get us material and often very significant risks. As a 27 year-old, works for the DNC, was shot in the back, murdered just a few weeks ago for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in Washington.

Reporter: That was just a robbery, I believe. Wasn’t it?

Julian Assange: No. There’s no finding. So… I’m suggesting that our sources take risks.

Looks like this story is being pursued by more and more people now, good.

Corpus Christi Republican Congressman Blake Farenthold considers the source behind the 2016 hack of the Democratic National Committee’s email server an unanswered question and believes a federal investigation is warranted.

Speaking on CNN Wednesday, the fourth-term congressman refuted a widely believed conclusion that the Russian government interfered with the U.S. presidential election to aid President Donald Trump’s campaign and instead indicated a conspiracy theory about a slain Democratic National Committee staffer could be true.

“My fear is our constant focusing on the Russians is deflecting away for some other things that we need to be investigating,” Farenthold said on the network. “There’s still some question as to whether the intrusion of the DNC server was an insider job or whether or not it was the Russians.”

Later Wednesday, Farenthold elaborated on his opinion of how the investigation should be handled in a phone interview with the Caller-Times. The death should be investigated in the same manner Russian interference has been reviewed, he said.

a reply to: D8Tee

WND is a disinfo/controlled opposition website, in my experience. Without taking this thread OT, I can say I had a very bad experience with Joseph Farah, a few years ago, and caught him covering for Obama. I had similar, but separate bad experiences with Jerome Corsi.

Farah, especially, is a thug though. I would bet everything I own on WND being disinfo/controlled opposition.

If WND is fielding the Seth Rich story, they are obfuscating something.

So, in that sense, I find this thread very interesting & revealing.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

i think you're right

originally posted by: Kali74

originally posted by: Idreamofme
a reply to: D8Tee

I dont know why they are trying to silence everyone. Way too late for that. Everyone already put the pieces together.

In crazy Pizzaland!

Very insightful

a reply to: MotherMayEye

I've actually avoided for WMD for the most part for the reasons you've stated so I don't know much about them.

I did think that they fell on the far right of the spectrum, that must be incorrect if they were covering for Obama?

Help me out with WMD, what do you think they are covering up?

a reply to: D8Tee

I don't know what they are covering up as far as the Seth Rich story goes...but I bet they are obfuscating something or they wouldn't be bothering.

I only know what they covered up for Obama with regard to some research I did a few years ago (I used to run a fairly popular blog and exposed WND for their disinfo). Recounting those events, here, would take some time and be wildly OT.