Wasserman Schultz Threatened Police Chief

a reply to: Indigo5

You make a lot of assumptions about words that can have several meanings. Member could mean member of anything. It could be a member of Congress, it could also be a member of the DNC or a member of their staff. Unless she clarified somewhere I didn't recognize, just assuming what she means by "member" is merely that, an assumption. Also with regard to "lost" stolen property is indeed referred to as "lost", "losses", etc routinely. I would know this having been burglarized twice and having gone through the process. Regardless, if the police have a warrant to keep said laptop, Debbie Rig-The-Primary has no say in the matter. A judge already decided if the police can have the laptop. She's nobody when it comes to that.

a reply to: butcherguy

It sure seemed like the Chief was being very careful with his words. Since we know who he is dealing with, I can't blame him.

He didn't want to slip up and tell Debbie that the laptop is part of an ongoing investigation into the DNC.

originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: butcherguy

It sure seemed like the Chief was being very careful with his words. Since we know who he is dealing with, I can't blame him.

He didn't want to slip up and tell Debbie that the laptop is part of an ongoing investigation into the DNC.

What he really wanted to say was, "Jesus woman you are a sick freak! We're still counting up how many laws those pictures break." But that needs to wait until after they approve the DC police department's budget.

What can I say about Wasserman Schultz?

Can't she just shut the Hell up?
Undermining all things logical.
Notorious liar.
The worst of the commies.

I'm sure there are more one-liners...but this one spells it out pretty clearly

a reply to: WeAreAWAKE

What can I say about Wasserman Schultz?

Her brother is assistant DA in DC.

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: Boadicea

I wonder if these guys are also behind the huge data breach in 2015 of the Office of Personnel Management?
en.wikipedia.org...

Lots and lots of information there that can be used to blackmail, extort, and bribe government employees (past and present), congress persons, and anybody that works or has worked for the government.

Excellent question! (It must be cause I wondered too and well great minds think alike, eh? Or, as my daughter says, great minds think for themselves and come to the same conclusions.)

I think it has to be considered -- and should be investigated. So much focus has been put on Seth Rich, and I sometimes wonder just how much of that -- including the unsourced links -- is to deflect from the Awan brothers. They were in a position to access far more information than Seth Rich, and we know they have both national and international associations to pass it on...

a reply to: six67seven

The dems that the Awan brothers were working for have implemented a code of silence, hoping this all blows over.

Funny how the potential for blackmail has that effect, eh???

One would think folks would get tired of having to watch their backs... but maybe that's just me.

a reply to: RazorV66

Indeed. Lying Scumbags rule the world. Nothing new sadly.

I don't recall any administration that was forthright, honest or decent in the last 3000 yrs.