Loud Bangs heard in Manchester UK

originally posted by: Necrose

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: Necrose

originally posted by: Leonidas
a reply to: Necrose

Take your crud elsewhere please.

I know It's sad, but you can't deny I am not telling the truth. I am off, just wanted to point out that.

Calling false flag to an event in the UK is crud.

False Flag is an American political neologism and is hardly applicable.

call it what you want, both World Wars started with false flag attacks, as did 9/11 the attack on "terrorism".

Both World Wars were definitely not started with false flag attacks. Are you having a Mandela Effect moment???

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: crazyewok

You're really losing it lately.

How?

Its true .

There motive was simple: they are muslim and they hate us and want to see westerners dead. Hell they want to see each other dead half the time.


Very simple.

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

and terror attacks in Paris, London, New York etc failed to accomplish it and in the end resulted in increased involvement from those countries against ISIS.

a reply to: kibric

The press conference hasn't happened yet.

originally posted by: Necrose

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: Necrose

originally posted by: Leonidas
a reply to: Necrose

Take your crud elsewhere please.

I know It's sad, but you can't deny I am not telling the truth. I am off, just wanted to point out that.

Calling false flag to an event in the UK is crud.

False Flag is an American political neologism and is hardly applicable.

call it what you want, both World Wars started with false flag attacks, as did 9/11 the attack on "terrorism".

The war started over 14 centuries ago when the Sunni and Shia split.

We got front row seats to the worlds longest running Hatfield and McCoy blood fued dragging the civilized world in to their crap sandwhich.

9-11 wasn't a 'false flag' considering the events of the eight years before it, and the thirty years before that.

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: Necrose

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: SprocketUK

TBH, if this gets fingers pointing to Iran, I'm calling total BS. But, after that # show in Saudi Arabia, it would not surprise me in the least.

A snip show.

That is one way to describe that arms deal.

I sure like to know how they went from discussing to putting Saudi on that travel ban to supply arms to one of the biggest financiers of terrorism around the globe.

Because Obama armed THE largest terror state, Iran.

The largest terror state by the number of killings would be the US, by far.

The ordinance of the Free World are for spreading peace and justice, suicide bombers are for spreading Islamic terror.

I am not quite sure whether this was sarcasm or not.

a reply to: crazyewok

The vast majority of Muslims are peaceful people just trying to live their lives like everyone else.

a reply to: Xcathdra

All i was saying is that there are times were terrorism can be effective.

Not that i agree with it but it can work.

And it always creates publicity and invigorates the cause.

a reply to: Grambler

Problem with retaliation is that it would be random attacks or burning mosques.

In the UK it would probably get hushed up, if possible.

Its a smallish place and if we had tit for tat kicking off it would end up a blood bath.

Can't have indisriminate violence all over. We are supposed to keep calm and carry on. Stiff upper lip and all that. But I dunno how long that'll last though.

There's pro and anti immigrant sentiment here and the terrorists probably hope we'll turn on each other.

a reply to: crazyewok

How?

Your not.

The world is losing it.

Terrorists will get us before the climate does.

Case in point.

originally posted by: Necrose

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: Necrose

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: SprocketUK

TBH, if this gets fingers pointing to Iran, I'm calling total BS. But, after that # show in Saudi Arabia, it would not surprise me in the least.

A snip show.

That is one way to describe that arms deal.

I sure like to know how they went from discussing to putting Saudi on that travel ban to supply arms to one of the biggest financiers of terrorism around the globe.

Because Obama armed THE largest terror state, Iran.

The largest terror state by the number of killings would be the US, by far.

The ordinance of the Free World are for spreading peace and justice, suicide bombers are for spreading Islamic terror.

I am not quite sure whether this was sarcasm or not.

That is because your mind is obviously twisted to be sympathetic towards terror.

originally posted by: Timely

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Why is the UK being hit lately??? Is there something recent going on there that would make them the target for any special reason????

The European countries have opened their hearts to a lot of immigrants from Islamic countries. UK, France, Germany, Greece, etc., have enabled large influxes.

There is talk that people returning from the ME who were attached to terrorist organisations are carrying on this disgusting practice at home.

Much worse than lone wolf terrorists , as these are well trained battle hardened bastards ...

Those "battle hardened bastards" have relatives. Kill the ones closest to them and broadcast that punishment through the terrorist channels. That's the best deterrence to the next potential attacker(s). This will happen sooner or later. Count on it.

originally posted by: Macenroe82
ISIS is claiming it as revenge for Mosul air strikes

ISIS revenge for Mosul

For larger image -

a reply to: Grambler

All those tactics make sense in the way you put it.

It bothers me that before all this kind of stuff took off and really got moving there were people who allegedly said that this was going to happen and it was being engineered to happen as well.

Warning about 9/11 and the war on terror etc, etc. But not that it would happen, but that it was being planned that way on purpose.

That with the fact that somehow we can't seem to stop it, or locate the source, they keep getting weapons including ours. I mean I can't be the only one who thinks some underhanded sh*t is going on which is keeping this going more than it should be am I???

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: crazyewok

The vast majority of Muslims are peaceful people just trying to live their lives like everyone else.

That's where you're wrong. They are peaceful as long as their religion is not questioned.

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: crazyewok

The vast majority of Muslims are peaceful people just trying to live their lives like everyone else.

The vast majority are silent enablers.

a reply to: Xcathdra

ISIS claiming responsibility doesn't really mean anything.

Them saying they done it does not really mean they done it.

Most attacks of this kind usually wind up having been inspired by groups like ISIS rather than directed by ISIS and the difference is a important one.

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: Xcathdra

All i was saying is that there are times were terrorism can be effective.

Not that i agree with it but it can work.

And it always creates publicity and invigorates the cause.

Fair point... I guess 200+ years ago terrorists were successful in getting the British to leave N. America's colonies.

Arianna Grande has another concert Thursday at the 02 Arena. It's not cancelled yet but quite sure it will be.
TMZ reporting her as hysterical and inconsolable.

TMZ also has some pictures of the scene. None of them are graphic. Mainly walking wounded.

www.tmz.com...

originally posted by: auroraaus

originally posted by: Necrose

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: Necrose

originally posted by: Leonidas
a reply to: Necrose

Take your crud elsewhere please.

I know It's sad, but you can't deny I am not telling the truth. I am off, just wanted to point out that.

Calling false flag to an event in the UK is crud.

False Flag is an American political neologism and is hardly applicable.

call it what you want, both World Wars started with false flag attacks, as did 9/11 the attack on "terrorism".

Both World Wars were definitely not started with false flag attacks. Are you having a Mandela Effect moment???

I am not having a ME.
WW1 - Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria
WW2 - Hitler's Reichstag fire