Are the Leftwing Elites Trying to Desensitize People With their infatuation on Cannibalism?

Know the saying "you are what you eat"? I wonder if that is true?

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

last post before i crash

i do not think it is ok to eat a person if there is nothing left due to conditioning from tv


thats an issue you are having

i think it is ok to eat a person if there is nothing left cause survival is our most basic instinct.
people have been doing it to survive long before these tv shows you hate were on my friend

but then again maybe the donner party binged on the santa clarita diet
i wasnt there so i dont know

a reply to: daskakik


Yeah...such "fear mongering" that even life science published an article about cannibalism as the answer to over-population...

Eat the Old: Could Mass Cannibalism Solve a Future Food Shortage?
By Adam Hadhazy | October 28, 2011 11:41am ET

The global human population is set to hit 7 billion on Oct. 31, and by century's end it will stand at 10 billion, according to the United Nations. That's a lot more mouths to feed.

There's a very good chance that generating food from traditional farming and livestock practices will not be able to keep pace with this boom. What if a worldwide food shortage were to become so terribly dire that people resorted to eating . . . people?

In such a dreadful event, the most-sensible first choice for meals might seem to be the elderly. After all, a fifth of those 10 billion humans will be at least 65 years old, and less physically able than the rest to contribute to what remains of society. [5 Ways the World Will Change Radically in the Next Century]
...

Eat the Old: Could Mass Cannibalism Solve a Future Food Shortage?

That was in 2011, and even though that article states it is unlikely for this to happen, they did entertain the notion of cannibalism as an answer to what they see as a global problem.

Then there are other more recent articles about cannibalism. Now, notice what Karen Hylen, the primary therapist at Summit Malibu Treatment Center in California has to say.

Several brutal crimes allegedly involving face biting, dismemberment and cannibalism have recently offered a chilling reminder that real life can be as bizarre as fiction — even a horror film.
...
Hylen said cannibalism often begins as a fantasy, which the person plays out in his or her head. But when that person gets a taste for real, “the pleasure center of the brain becomes activated and large amounts of dopamine are released –- similar to what happens when someone ingests a drug like coc aine.”

Once that happens, Hylen said, the burgeoning cannibal’s brain becomes conditioned to seek out the activity in order to obtain the feeling again, which leads to a cycle of cannibalism that can only be stopped through outside intervention.
...

www.huffingtonpost.com...

Or what about a Stanford professor mulling over the use of cannibalism to feed the rest of the world.

Stanford professor Paul Ehrlich predicts population increases will lead to food crisis
Says we will have to address if it is 'okay to eat the bodies of your dead because we’re all so hungry'

By Mark Prigg

Published: 19:04 EDT, 22 May 2014 | Updated: 03:51 EDT, 23 May 2014

A controversial Stanford professor has claimed overpopulation could lead to humanity having to eat the bodies of the dead.

Paul Ehrlich, best known for his prediction of human 'oblivion' 46 years ago, says that current population trends are on a course that could leave cannibalism as one of the only options.

Ehrlich claimed that scarcity of resources will get so bad that humans will need to drastically change our eating habits and agriculture
...

Will overpopulation drive us to eat our own DEAD? Controversial academic claims humanity is moving towards cannibalism at 'ridiculous speed'

There are many other articles, and even research papers done on cannibalism as a solution to world problems, and how in the view of some it is an answer to many world problems.

Then there is this one, yet more recent article. Notice it starts with cannibalism among animals, but then it goes into human cannibalism.

In Many Species, a Family Dinner Means Something Else

By BILL SCHUTTJAN. 30, 2017

...
The Kids Menu

As a new generation of researchers builds upon the work of scientists like Dr. Polis and Laurel Fox, an evolutionary biologist at the University of California, Santa Cruz, cannibalism in nature has begun to seem almost normal.
...
It Isn’t Just for Animals

Are there instances where, as in the animal kingdom, human cannibalism makes sense? And if so, could this behavior resurface in the future? Cannibalism may be gruesome, and repugnant to our current sensibilities, but it has been widely practiced for a variety of reasons.
...
As scientists have come to understand, factors like overpopulation and a lack of alternative forms of nutrition lead to cannibalism among animals, and it is clear that even modern humans have been driven to the behavior on many occasions. What, then, of the future?

Populations are growing. Resources are dwindling. Deserts are spreading. And the societal rules that bind us together are proving more fragile than we ever imagined they could be. Maybe it is wise to remember that human cannibalism, so unthinkable now, was not uncommon not so long ago.
...

In Many Species, a Family Dinner Means Something Else

If you cannot see where this is leading, then you are completely oblivious that your own reasoning for thinking "it is completely okay to eat another human if there is nothing to eat" comes directly from the conditioning that has been occurring for decades. Which leads to the first premise made in this thread.

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Finding other fear mongers doesn't mean you are not fear mongering.

Besides what better way to push Agenda 21 than to place in peoples minds that they may have to eat grandma.

Closed for review.