Trump “revealed more information to Russian ambassador than we have shared with our own allies”

And now the Republicans want an intel briefing for Trump to explain what he leaked to the Russians. uh oh....


www.rawstory.com...

a reply to: AngryCymraeg

according to all the headlines and the tweets this has to do with the safety of commercial flights and the potential of terrorists bringing down a commercial plane. what is the problem with trying to prevent a disaster that will take innocent lives? everything else are just assumptions at this point.

originally posted by: Kali74
Someone needs to stop letting our President run around unsupervised!

He was supervised, dont flip out everyone.

McMasters was there and said himself, there was no top secrets leaked to Russia in their meeting.

You going to believe unnamed sources and WaPo who clearly has a bias against trump, or the National Security Adviser General?

No need to respond I already know.

originally posted by: TownCryer
Just imagine if a Democrat President had even a hint of Trump's kind of controversy. Sites like ATS would explode. But, for Trump, you guys who are so anxious to find conspiracy in everything, see nothing wrong with a the Pres allowing Russian ambassadors into the Oval Office, and sharing top-secret info with them. Self-delusional, 'poorly educated', hypocrites. Your hatred for Hillary and Obama have blinded you to a clearly incompetent, corrupt buffoon whose refusal to pay any heed to expert advise is placing this country and our armed forces serving over-seas in jeopardy. As I say, if this was a 'D' president, you guys would be organizing marches, threatening armed revolt, and forming militias by now. Pathetic

Worst. President. Ever.

Remember when Russia shared classified Intel about two brothers they believed were terrorists? On two separate occasions. And then those same brothers committed the Boston marathon bombing after the obama admin ignored the Intel? Worst president ever. Maybe nations should share Intel more often?

originally posted by: Butterfinger

originally posted by: Kali74
Someone needs to stop letting our President run around unsupervised!

He was supervised, dont flip out everyone.

McMasters was there and said himself, there was no top secrets leaked to Russia in their meeting.

You going to believe unnamed sources and WaPo who clearly has a bias against trump, or the National Security Adviser General?

No need to respond I already know.

Apparently the Trump WH are the ones flipping out. They know this is serious. And so does the GOP.


www.rawstory.com...

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: N9neXkrayzie
a reply to: Ohanka

On one hand we're supposed to believe Russian Intel is capable of "hacking" our election and inserting their "puppet". And on the other hand we're supposed to believe Russian Intel is so lacking that they didn't already know what city Isis is running operations out of? Sounds to me like if trump did share info, it's about as basic as Intel can get. But the liberal media jumps all over it with words like "highly classified" "anonymous sources" and people are outraged because they're told they're supposed to be. The situation is laughable.

I don't think you understand how intel works. You don't share it with regional rivals who are under sanctions and who are actively destabilising entire regions. You just don't. You can't trust them.
Yes, the situation is indeed laughable, but not for the reasons you think. Trump is showing himself to be so far out of his depth he's no longer visible underwater. If he tells the Russians about even basic intel then the NATO powers are going to go very quiet in terms of sharing their own intel.
Trump is a joke.

He shared Intel that I literally read online about 6 weeks ago. All that was left out then was the city the Intel came from. I could have taken 3 guesses and gotten Rocca. The fact that some people think Trump is the bad guy in all of this is what's laughable. If the information was so sensitive why was it written about over a month ago?

originally posted by: TheScale
a reply to: AngryCymraeg

according to all the headlines and the tweets this has to do with the safety of commercial flights and the potential of terrorists bringing down a commercial plane. what is the problem with trying to prevent a disaster that will take innocent lives? everything else are just assumptions at this point.

Exactly! Desperate idiots needed a "Trump fix" on a slow news day.

"“As President I wanted to share with Russia (at an openly scheduled W.H. meeting) which I have the absolute right to do, facts pertaining to terrorism and airline flight safety. Humanitarian reasons, plus I want Russia to greatly step up their fight against ISIS & terrorism,” Trump wrote in a pair of tweets.""

Source: www.foxnews.com...

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: TheScale
a reply to: AngryCymraeg

according to all the headlines and the tweets this has to do with the safety of commercial flights and the potential of terrorists bringing down a commercial plane. what is the problem with trying to prevent a disaster that will take innocent lives? everything else are just assumptions at this point.

Exactly! Desperate idiots needed a "Trump fix" on a slow news day.

"“As President I wanted to share with Russia (at an openly scheduled W.H. meeting) which I have the absolute right to do, facts pertaining to terrorism and airline flight safety. Humanitarian reasons, plus I want Russia to greatly step up their fight against ISIS & terrorism,” Trump wrote in a pair of tweets.""

Source: www.foxnews.com...

or to distract from the Seth Rich story

originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: N9neXkrayzie

Haha, nice, you've pulled a wonderful assumption straight out of your ass. You have never been in the intelligence gathering industry, so your musings on any aspect therein is about as useful as a screen door on a submarine.

Russians are likely propping up Isis where it benefits them as much as going against US interest (just as we did/do with them). We are only 'allies' against terrorism where it benefits us both (which isn't everywhere).

The russian intelligence apparatus is versed in backtracking through information to derive sources. A buffoon like the donald could easily be suckered into blabbing about information (that he felt wasn't secret) which could be used by the russians to figure out who's working for us (and then do any number of nefarious deeds with that information).

So did you have the same view when obama shared Intel with Russia? i.imgs.fyi...
Or does that change your spin like it does for the Washington post?

So let me get this straight.... The U.S. and Russia are allies in the fight against ISIS, the U.S. has info on ISIS that can aid Russia in attacking them, so sharing this info is wrong or bad how???

I thought classified info was on a "need to know" basis.. Well if Russia is fighting this war with us, wouldn't they qualify as need to know?

McMasters is briefing the press shortly.

video.foxnews.com...=watch-live

originally posted by: SonOfThor
a reply to: Sillyolme

Lol who is 'they' and how is information from secure briefings being leaked to the press (if it's true at all)...

There were plenty of inept cabinet people in previous administrations - that is somewhat of a requirement it seems to become political apointees...

You know they. The little fairies and fey that live in my garden. They feed my unicorn rainbow fruity pebbles.
Rolls eyes.

I guess they are people in those briefings with him.
True about cabinets in the past.
This one seems to have really raised the bar on the weird and bizarre.

originally posted by: N9neXkrayzie

originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: N9neXkrayzie

Haha, nice, you've pulled a wonderful assumption straight out of your ass. You have never been in the intelligence gathering industry, so your musings on any aspect therein is about as useful as a screen door on a submarine.

Russians are likely propping up Isis where it benefits them as much as going against US interest (just as we did/do with them). We are only 'allies' against terrorism where it benefits us both (which isn't everywhere).

The russian intelligence apparatus is versed in backtracking through information to derive sources. A buffoon like the donald could easily be suckered into blabbing about information (that he felt wasn't secret) which could be used by the russians to figure out who's working for us (and then do any number of nefarious deeds with that information).

So did you have the same view when obama shared Intel with Russia? i.imgs.fyi...
Or does that change your spin like it does for the Washington post?

I hope you know that not all classified information is equal and just because Obama did it doesn't mean that Trump doing it now was the right thing to do.

a reply to: neo96

Well at least we know who the leaker is now.

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: Sillyolme

Food for thought: Why is congress not doing its job? They are the only body that can save the American people and our allies from the disastrous president. Why is it so important to do tax breaks over protecting americans? What do they know we don't know is coming?

They are just returning today from a twelve day break. I'm sure they are talking.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

I hope you know that not all classified information is equal and just because Obama did it doesn't mean that Trump doing it now was the right thing to do.

wow
right square between the eyes

a reply to: ThingsThatDontMakeSense


I am so sick of you TRUMPTARDS sticking up for this man. He is the one who said Hilary should be put in jail for doing LESS than what he did. She was careless with email, but trump one ups that, he just GIVES Russia intel, this is grounds for IMPEACHMENT, PERIOD, END of STORY..


You people just go ahead and praise him, and point fingers at other people all you want. FACTS ARE FACTS!!!! Hell even leading psychologists have said he is a loose canyon.....This right here is proof....


Go ahead and deflect, like a typical trump supporter, it no longer is relevant, now you just look stupid!!!

a reply to: neo96

Who's doing anything to undermine him?
What are those actions that have undermined him?
Everything that has happened since he took office have been of his own design.
The president always has detractors. Every single one has. It's their job to work around that.
This guy has controversy on speed dial.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: neo96

Who's doing anything to undermine him?
What are those actions that have undermined him?
Everything that has happened since he took office have been of his own design.
The president always has detractors. Every single one has. It's their job to work around that.
This guy has controversy on speed dial.

i think the tone that the media takes in articles about him and the studies that show they are around 90% biased in the negative proves that the media is in every way trying to undermine him. i mean they freaked out over his scoops of ice cream. u cant get much crazier then that.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I hope you know that not all classified information is equal and just because Obama did it doesn't mean that Trump doing it now was the right thing to do.

wow
right square between the eyes

Because Obama may have been authorized to do it by the IC. Just bringing up the event without context doesn't magically make your point more compelling.