Is the Firing of James Comey By President Trump a cover up?? The BBC think it might be....

a reply to: Charlyboy

The timing gets even more interesting, Trump is meeting the Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov tomorrow at the White House. Do you think he will get a thumbs up?

a reply to: Charlyboy

Trump every now and then randomly fires someone on his staff. It's very effective in keeping people in line. He also gives out random promotions and random bonuses. This element of randomness with pluses and minuses maximizes productivity.

I think the firing of Comey and in the way it was accomplished was to protect all existing FBI records that pertain to possible corruption of the last administration. The democrats seem to have a problem preserving any information that may be self incriminating or not in tune with their agenda.
a reply to: Charlyboy

BBC is terrible. These days most website reports are based on memes, random crap pulled from Facebook and other inane s***t that's reduced journalism to idiotic bloggery for people with ADHD like '10 ways to know you're a mong'. The news is also almost laughable in its overt bias towards Israel.

World service is still the only part of the corporation that has the slightest bit of journalistic merit.'

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: Charlyboy

Trump every now and then randomly fires someone on his staff. It's very effective in keeping people in line. He also gives out random promotions and random bonuses. This element of randomness with pluses and minuses maximizes productivity.

That is how you get leaks and crap work. If you know you could be fired any day for no reason who cares about how they do their job? Randomness does not maximize productivity. Who ever thinks this is good business practices is wrong.

originally posted by: UKTruth
I think this story now needs to close with the indictment of Hillary Clinton, which should have happened last Summer. Justice must be done to restore faith.

Because nothing addresses present day shenanigans in the White House like going after the losing candidate! Distract and deflect...LOL

"taxpayer funded charade"

The media is reporting that Comey wanted more funding resources.
Trump essentially said don't spend tax resources for this, if you are captivated by this stuff wait for the book.

a reply to: Charlyboy

No its not a coverup. The termination of the FBI director has no bearing on the agents in charges of the investigations, including into the collusion russia bs. Those investigations will continue without missing a beat.

originally posted by: Cauliflower

"taxpayer funded charade"

The media is reporting that Comey wanted more funding resources.
Trump essentially said don't spend tax resources for this, if you are captivated by this stuff wait for the book.

The DOJ has stated no request was ever made. While trump has gone after "waste" he has stated, with regards to the Russia investigation, that it needs to be continued and full completed as thats the only way they are going to be able to move on instead of constantly being sidetracked by Democrats / Russia claims.

a reply to: JohnnyCanuck

Its well within the statute of limitations. Considering the FBI had an email stating that AG Lynch would protect Clinton from Criminal prosecution a review is warranted.

The timing gets even more interesting, Trump is meeting the Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov tomorrow at the White House. Do you think he will get a thumbs up?

a reply to: uncommitted

Well given the Clinton debacle (I personally think she should be in jail for her actions but also for the way she ran her campaign!), I give him thumbs up. But I give hm thumbs down for a number of his polices too. To be honest though 100 days in and I don't see the catastrophe predicted by career politicians. Plenty of time though

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck

Its well within the statute of limitations. Considering the FBI had an email stating that AG Lynch would protect Clinton from Criminal prosecution a review is warranted.

Well, seeing as the right has the White House, Congress and the Senate, and fires anybody who disagrees with them, how come you can't make it stick? Fact remains, she is not being investigated...he is. The other answer may be that things are rolling out as they should (and can attain an incitement).

"But Hillery..." is a battle cry that is sounding increasingly pathetic given everything else going on.

a reply to: JohnnyCanuck

Trump is not being investigated and obamas people already stated there was no collusion between Trump and Russia. What is continuing is the investigation into several former members of his campaign and thus far nothing.

Of all the leaks we have seen, including the leaking of recent Grand Jury investigations into Flynn (grand jury stuff is secret and not a matter of public record until completion and only then by law), if there was evidence against Trump / others it would have come out.

None of the Democrats have brought forward any evidence to support their claims either.

Clinton is actually still under investigation regarding the Clinton Foundation as well as perjury (referral by congress).

The only thing pathetic is how the Democrats are desperately trying to blame anyone and everyone for their criminal acts.

a reply to: Charlyboy

Does anyone else think that we're a live experiment on government distrust?

"Lets make those who distrust the government trust the government and those who trust the government distrust the government to see if they continue viewing each other as enemies, when in reality they are both the same. Silly sausages."

"Your morning papers Mr. Soros"

"Ah - thank you my dearest Butlington Butler, seeing you first thing in the morning with my papers truly makes my stone soar"

originally posted by: MagnaCarta2015
BBC is terrible. These days most website reports are based on memes, random crap pulled from Facebook and other inane s***t that's reduced journalism to idiotic bloggery for people with ADHD like '10 ways to know you're a mong'. The news is also almost laughable in its overt bias towards Israel.

World service is still the only part of the corporation that has the slightest bit of journalistic merit.'

The BBC is overtly biased towards Israel - are you really saying that? Utter and complete bollox, it's bias towards Palestine has been the subject of many inquiries over the years. I'm sorry, that alone has rendered any other comment you make pointless.

originally posted by: Charlyboy

The timing gets even more interesting, Trump is meeting the Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov tomorrow at the White House. Do you think he will get a thumbs up?

a reply to: uncommitted

Well given the Clinton debacle (I personally think she should be in jail for her actions but also for the way she ran her campaign!), I give him thumbs up. But I give hm thumbs down for a number of his polices too. To be honest though 100 days in and I don't see the catastrophe predicted by career politicians. Plenty of time though

You think Clinton should be in jail mainly because of the mouth frothing sensationalism of the political right and the orange turd during the election, yet you have a go at the BBC.... interesting.

woaaa.........never heard such things before.......can..you..telll......me....more..