Yates and Clapper Testimony Begins

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I don't get the dismissive attitude some have about Russian hacking. It's kind of a big deal.

The fact that they hacked is a big deal or that you believe the hack some how effected the outcome in the election is a big deal?

Yes and yes, but only the first question is a legal problem. If this investigation turns up with an impeachment, it's not like we'll redecide the election or anything. We'll just follow the Constitutional rules of succession of power for an early exit President. So while the second question is important, it's really only one that needs an answer for peace of mind. It has no legal repercussions.

I have a feeling Comey is going to be thrown under the bus after all this is over.

From clappers statement given to the press prior to the hearing.
www.judiciary.senate.gov...

While it’s been over four months since the issuance of the assessment, as Directors Comey and Rogers testified before the House intelligence committee on March 20th, the conclusions and confidence levels reached at the time still stand.

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I don't get the dismissive attitude some have about Russian hacking. It's kind of a big deal.

The fact that they hacked is a big deal or that you believe the hack some how effected the outcome in the election is a big deal?

It's not the hacking itself that's a big deal it's that Trump committed treason by trying to affect the outcome.

If Hillary tried to affect Trumps campaign thru a foreign power...that would also be treason and should be dealt with as such.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I don't get the dismissive attitude some have about Russian hacking. It's kind of a big deal.

The fact that they hacked is a big deal or that you believe the hack some how effected the outcome in the election is a big deal?

Yes and yes, but only the first question is a legal problem. If this investigation turns up with an impeachment, it's not like we'll redecide the election or anything. We'll just follow the Constitutional rules of succession of power for an early exit President. So while the second question is important, it's really only one that needs an answer for peace of mind. It has no legal repercussions.

This will not hurt Trump in the slightest. He got rid of Flynn. What i want to know is why Obama warned Trump about Flynn but then didn't even bothered to launch a investigation into him. Seems like Obama had something to hide.

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I don't get the dismissive attitude some have about Russian hacking. It's kind of a big deal.

The fact that they hacked is a big deal or that you believe the hack some how effected the outcome in the election is a big deal?

It's not the hacking itself that's a big deal it's that Trump committed treason by trying to affect the outcome.

If Hillary tried to affect Trumps campaign thru a foreign power...that would also be treason and should be dealt with as such.

Allegedly......No one has brought any proof prior and even today that shows any collusion....soooooo what do you have a problem with?

a reply to: olaru12

Clapper just said that there is no evidence that the Trump did what you are accusing.

a reply to: Perfectenemy

If you think that Flynn getting Trump in trouble is a long shot than Flynn getting Obama in trouble is an even LONGER shot.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I don't get the dismissive attitude some have about Russian hacking. It's kind of a big deal.

The fact that they hacked is a big deal or that you believe the hack some how effected the outcome in the election is a big deal?

Yes and yes, but only the first question is a legal problem. If this investigation turns up with an impeachment, it's not like we'll redecide the election or anything. We'll just follow the Constitutional rules of succession of power for an early exit President. So while the second question is important, it's really only one that needs an answer for peace of mind. It has no legal repercussions.

impeachment is going to be a Reeeaaacchhh with no evidence of Trump colluding.....

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Perfectenemy

If you think that Flynn getting Trump in trouble is a long shot than Flynn getting Obama in trouble is an even LONGER shot.

Nah Lynch and Comey will bury Obama.

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I don't get the dismissive attitude some have about Russian hacking. It's kind of a big deal.

The fact that they hacked is a big deal or that you believe the hack some how effected the outcome in the election is a big deal?

Yes and yes, but only the first question is a legal problem. If this investigation turns up with an impeachment, it's not like we'll redecide the election or anything. We'll just follow the Constitutional rules of succession of power for an early exit President. So while the second question is important, it's really only one that needs an answer for peace of mind. It has no legal repercussions.

impeachment is going to be a Reeeaaacchhh with no evidence of Trump colluding.....

Well if you'll notice, I used the word IF. I haven't actually said anything definitive. I'm still waiting for the investigation to actually finish before I make any judgement calls on guilt one way or the other.

Sally Yates is soooo full of crap.....She is now quoting media sources as proof of Flynn wrong doing....Laughable!!!

Her whole saying do not draw conclusions from me not answering just makes me want to vomit....

So much hearsay how can we take anything of this seriously. Might,if,allegedly an so forth.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Perfectenemy

If you think that Flynn getting Trump in trouble is a long shot than Flynn getting Obama in trouble is an even LONGER shot.

Nah Lynch and Comey will bury Obama.

According to what evidence?

Wow these hearings are such a waste of time.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Perfectenemy

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Perfectenemy

If you think that Flynn getting Trump in trouble is a long shot than Flynn getting Obama in trouble is an even LONGER shot.

Nah Lynch and Comey will bury Obama.

According to what evidence?

Judical Watch is working on it right now as we speak. Be patient my friend.

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I don't get the dismissive attitude some have about Russian hacking. It's kind of a big deal.

The fact that they hacked is a big deal or that you believe the hack some how effected the outcome in the election is a big deal?

It's not the hacking itself that's a big deal it's that Trump committed treason by trying to affect the outcome.

If Hillary tried to affect Trumps campaign thru a foreign power...that would also be treason and should be dealt with as such.

Allegedly......No one has brought any proof prior and even today that shows any collusion....soooooo what do you have a problem with?

I have a problem with Trumps constant lies. Flip flopping on issues, child like leading with tweets, turning over important international diplomacy to a Zionist Jared Kushner, and appointing a racist key adviser S. Bannon....want more?

Trumps Russian connection needs to be completely investigated.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Perfectenemy

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Perfectenemy

If you think that Flynn getting Trump in trouble is a long shot than Flynn getting Obama in trouble is an even LONGER shot.

Nah Lynch and Comey will bury Obama.

According to what evidence?

Judical Watch is working on it right now as we speak. Be patient my friend.

Lol. So you got nothing.

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I don't get the dismissive attitude some have about Russian hacking. It's kind of a big deal.

The fact that they hacked is a big deal or that you believe the hack some how effected the outcome in the election is a big deal?

It's not the hacking itself that's a big deal it's that Trump committed treason by trying to affect the outcome.

If Hillary tried to affect Trumps campaign thru a foreign power...that would also be treason and should be dealt with as such.

Allegedly......No one has brought any proof prior and even today that shows any collusion....soooooo what do you have a problem with?

I have a problem with Trumps constant lies. Flip flopping on issues, child like leading with tweets, turning over important international diplomacy to a Zionist Jared Kushner, and appointing a racist key adviser S. Bannon....want more?

No that's like your opinion man.....

I do have an issue with nothing you mentioned being illegal.....

lol
Clapper is answering with 16 intel agencies assessment
Yates is disagreeing with him.

Too funny