Trump: FBI director gave Clinton 'free pass for many bad deeds'

What did Russia do?

Can anyone tell me?


abcnews.go.com... d

President Trump on Tuesday took a fresh jab at former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, suggesting in two tweets late Tuesday that his own FBI Director James Comey had intentionally gone easy in his investigation of her emails.

"FBI Director Comey was the best thing that ever happened to Hillary Clinton in that he gave her a free pass for many bad deeds. The phony… ” Trump said in a Twitter post late Tuesday night.

"...Trump/Russia story was an excuse used by the Democrats as justification for losing the election. Perhaps Trump just ran a great campaign?" he continued in a subsequent tweet, sent about 15 minutes later.

IMPORTANT: New (old) Standards Are Being Enforced (again) For New Threads

a reply to: iWontGiveUP

Poor Hillary, she just can't seem to get back into the limelight...

Trumps understanding of the law is right up there with his understanding of U.S. history.
Who cares what he says. He lies as easily as breathing. Who cares what he thinks. He doesn't read or try to enlighten himself on any subject that doesn't specifically pertain to or benefit donald trump.

a reply to: iWontGiveUP

She did got away with a free pass, that is undeniable, her dirty corrupted money and her deep ties within the intelligence community including the justice Department and Obama cover up ensure that her crap was untouchable.

a reply to: iWontGiveUP

Trump responding to the news in a tweet.
What a surprise huh?
They actually timed him this time to see how long it would take him.
It's hilarious.
Nine hours.

a reply to: intrptr

Really? Because I saw her on tv looking very fit and relaxed just yesterday.

Oh by limelight you mean constantly the center of attention?
No it's just trump who desires that. Needs that I should say...

a reply to: marg6043

Wrong. The law is the law.
Sorry .

Russian issue a DNC excuse? Interesting. Considering it was under investigation early in the Summer of 2016.

Comey appearing in an open hearing today.
Of course you guys wouldn't be interested in watching. You might learn something.
Oh horrors...

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: marg6043

Wrong. The law is the law.
Sorry .

And you are clearly completely ignorant of the law or your head is buried so deep in the sand you aren't capable of rational thought.

I'm so glad they are still allowing Trump to send out Tweets whenever he wants. Trump doesn't need to keep reminding us Hillary got away scott free, we are all aware.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: intrptr

Really? Because I saw her on tv looking very fit and relaxed just yesterday.

Oh by limelight you mean constantly the center of attention?
No it's just trump who desires that. Needs that I should say...

They wouldn't be even showing Hillary if it wasn't a focalized campaign to keep her familiar to us.
The media decides what to cover, to cover whatever they are told to.

What I don't understand is with all this hullabaloo how is it that she's not indicted? Either it's fake news or someone in the DOJ is simply not doing their job. Why haven't Republicans appointed a special prosecutor? I don't understand how she is not indicted at this point unless it's all made up BS and there's no evidence but fake news innuendo.

a reply to: iWontGiveUP

Hillary who? Oh thatvwashed up rag...whi cares what she says or does anymore? She was irrelevant during the campaign and is irrelevant now.

a reply to: Martin75

No she's not.
You're just upset because trump is failing so badly.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Martin75

No she's not.
You're just upset because trump is failing so badly.

Y'all can't get over her losing
OK, if you say so. Who is President again and who is out walking their dog in the forest?
Yeah, I think Trump winning will keep me going for a while.....
Bless your heart

a reply to: Sillyolme

Your posts come across as though you are some kind of spurned lover...

Any last minute voters she lost were from people in districts where she won anyway.
Nobody* outside of a major city is dense enough to have voted for her in the first place.


*Obviously there are exceptions, but I'd say the numbers speak for themselves here

a reply to: iWontGiveUP

She colluded to influence the primary elections
She lied to the American people about her health
She lied to the American people about her crimes
She destroyed subpoenaed evidence
She influenced congressional inquiries
She cheated in the debates
She called half the voting population deplorable.
She believed abortions, for any reason, should be publicly funded
She catered to wall street, going so far as to openly proclaim to them that she maintains public and private agendas
Her husband took 10 million from for-profit institutions (a bit worse than Trump-U)
Podesta took tens of millions more from the Russians and didn't report it

Those are just the verifiable facts. Not to mention the business with her foundation (ask Haiti how that worked out for them), people mysteriously dying all around her, the Ghaddafi deal actually being over his plan to separate from the Petro Dollar, saying she wished she could drone strike Assange while simultaneously claiming such professional ineptitude that she wouldn't know of the details involved with such a thing. Oh, wait, that last part is a verifiable fact as well. Basically, she's the worst candidate in the history of democratic candidates.

a reply to: bender151

How come those facts aren't widely known?