Clinton Gives Blame to Gender Bias for Election Failure

Liberals must blame. As if their greatness of cause was not recognized in the market place of ideas. Anything to demean, it must be done that way as part of the larger effort to divide to at least 1/2 or 50/50. In this case divide men and women......the devils work.....on issues of supposed justice and misjustice.

Naturally her election failure wouldn't have to due with her race. They are saving that for Don, to lessen the legitimacy of his election victory.

Anyway......the point of this thread is to remind folks to never expect the liberals to do anything but put american culture on trial even when the culture has zip to do with their political rejection. Even when race, wealth, gender nor ect have nothing to do with outcomes. Hillary would rather take a crap all over everything than come to terms with her politics being rejected. All that didn't vote for her are misogynists then at least politically. Not to mention other things. Oh but she stands there for all women......and men when they get their mind right.....and come to terms on what is best for them.

a reply to: Logarock

It couldn't have been the countless scandals, mud-slinging or flip-flopping on the issues though, right? Just gender bias?

If anything I think being that she was a woman got her a lot of the votes that it did.

Hillary Clinton is another parasitic career politician who would sell out American security to the highest bidder with no morale qualms. I despise that woman (and her husband Bill and their little crony-crew)

a reply to: Logarock

The only issue I'd have is with the term "liberals".

It's the leftists, the socialists that try to rewrite history and change definitions.

It can never be that most people reject their dictatorial brand of politics, it has to be the fault of stupid people.

originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: Logarock


If anything I think being that she was a woman got her a lot of the votes that it did.

Yes she was probably really shooting at women that didn't vote for her, but used a shot gun.

If she keeps blaming everyone, she will not have anyone to pander too if she tries again which is doubtful she won't have anyone to try to trick into voting for her

a reply to: Logarock

I thought it was the Russians that lost her the election?

What excuse is she going to pull out of her # tomorrow?

No, many of us had an ethics bias.

"She who shall never be named by me again" lacks an essential grasp of simple ethics, or she does, but doesn't care (which is actually worse.)

FYI, I didn't vote for Trump, either. For many of the same reasons.

a reply to: Logarock

Remember Hillarys new motto - resist, persist, insist, enlist.

Well, she's onto the 'insist' stage of denial....

Resist (telling the truth)
Persist (with the "the god damn Russians stole Hillarys throne" dribble)
Insist (that someone else is to blame)
enlist (retards)

a reply to: DBCowboy


I cant see enough room to tell much diff between a lib and a lefty. Whats that lib is soft left? Then "progressives". Spozed to be some room there to tell one from the other but wow looks all blurry.

Clinton really needs to shut the hell up.

Republicans have painted her as a devil for years. This outcome was not unexpected.

She chose to run, the establishment chose to back her, and she managed to lose to Donald J. Trump.

a reply to: Sublimecraft


See??? This explains why the press is lining up here. Tossing themselves like bugs onto the flame.

a reply to: Greven


A guy that like to get a handful......must be hurting them real bad.

originally posted by: Logarock
a reply to: DBCowboy


I cant see enough room to tell much diff between a lib and a lefty. Whats that lib is soft left? Then "progressives". Spozed to be some room there to tell one from the other but wow looks all blurry.

A true liberal would want more freedoms, the actual leftists who co-opted the title use it to give the impression that more laws, fewer freedoms, higher taxes, less freedoms is "liberal".

Hillary has a dart-board. It has reasons for her multiple failures at becoming President on it. She seems to throw that dart every month, and wherever it lands, is her "here's why I lost" reason-of-the-month. Naturally there's no excuse on the dart board entitled, "because I'm a boring hateful nasty woman".

Here's a summary of her dartboard: www.breitbart.com...

originally posted by: Logarock
a reply to: Greven


A guy that like to get a handful......must be hurting them real bad.

Well, in his defense, all guys like to get a handful.

Not an ill-begotten handful... but, well you know.

I wish someone would put that Leprechaun back into a chest and throw away the key. She lost because she was ill. Hell a blind person could see that. She looked like death itself after the debates. Maybe someone could approach Huma and flip her to spill the beans. She is just her lapdog for now and women like her have other ambitions too. I will never understand how the american justice department screwed up a slam dunk like the server in the basement fiasco. That was a whole new level of incompetence. I know Judicalwatch has something in the pipeline but come on they have no chance against the crooked Leprechaun.

a reply to: Logarock

Apparently, she and Bill were horrible to be around during
the campaign, treating staff terribly and blaming them
even before she lost.

Clintons Blamed Staffers For losses during eleciton campaign

Thank God she did not win!

a reply to: Logarock

So , the Fact that She was More than Likely the Worst Presidential Candidate in American History that just Happened to be a Woman didn't Matter in Her Losing the Election ? Yeah , Right . Go Bake some Cookies for your Grand Kids now Hillary , or is that Also to Sexist to Say Nowadays to ? ........

We should all encourage her to try again in 2020

a reply to: xstealth

No Clint , You don't wanna Go There...........LOL