Linda Moulton Howe - Update

originally posted by: MuonToGluon
The less relevant one becomes, the more ludicrous and increasing louder they become while making up stories that any past work that was once good is left behind and looked at in disdain.

She is well past her prime (in EVERY way) and has no influence over any current generation of investigators, no one serious wants to speak to her or know her or be near her.

She is unimportant, her yelling and "edge" is just an old lady who sold her self long ago and has noticed no one cares about her any longer, so she makes up more and more nonsense that makes an advanced dementia sufferer and SecureTeam look better and trustworthy in comparison.

The public's interest in her was lost a long time ago, it's sad to see that her previous good work is now being looked at in disdain because of her current nuttyness.

Blah blah blah.....

Still no reason to hoax anything you don't agree with.
I thought this was a place to share info and let members decide for themselves, no matter how outlandish it may seem. Sounds like a discredit/disinfo campaign to me. I see threads from Greer, Dolyan, Schneider etc. are allowed to live so why not this one? The only thing this does is raise suspicion.

originally posted by: TrueMessiah
I thought this was a place to share info and let members decide for themselves, no matter how outlandish it may seem. Sounds like a discredit/disinfo campaign to me. I see threads from Greer, Dolyan, Schneider etc. are allowed to live so why not this one? The only thing this does is raise suspicion.

What you think and how the site is run by the owner and administrator is 2 different things.

Administrators and Owner decides the contents, it has always been that way.

Of course this raises suspicion...we're on a Conspiracy site, a badly shaped cloud in the sky is suspicious and a sign of a planet about to smash into the earth that the government is covering up...everything is suspicious.

originally posted by: MuonToGluon

originally posted by: TrueMessiah
I thought this was a place to share info and let members decide for themselves, no matter how outlandish it may seem. Sounds like a discredit/disinfo campaign to me. I see threads from Greer, Dolyan, Schneider etc. are allowed to live so why not this one? The only thing this does is raise suspicion.

What you think and how the site is run by the owner and administrator is 2 different things.

Administrators and Owner decides the contents, it has always been that way.

Of course this raises suspicion...we're on a Conspiracy site, a badly shaped cloud in the sky is suspicious and a sign of a planet about to smash into the earth that the government is covering up...everything is suspicious.

Yes I know who runs this site and it's not beyond a member to question why some threads live and others don't, especially when they concern similar subject matter.

The suspicion I speak of arises from what I and many others consider it to be an unjust hoaxing with no explanation multiple pages in.

We come to a conspiracy site to gain help in finding answers, not to have that very site be involved in a conspiracy in itself.

By the way, what was that explanation again?

originally posted by: TrueMessiah
By the way, what was that explanation again?

It's similar to how any thread to do with SecureTeam is removed and put into Hoax or LoLs.

Her past actions and deceit in making up hoaxes and BS stories has left no confidence and trust with the Owner and Admins, so they remove threads regarding her, and I suspect that there may be a few personal/internal related issues in regard to her and Springer.

At least people can still post on the threads and they weren't deleted off the site or locked, you still have the freedom to post and speak your mind and present any further proof that might warrant a new thread creation.

originally posted by: MuonToGluon

originally posted by: TrueMessiah
By the way, what was that explanation again?

It's similar to how any thread to do with SecureTeam is removed and put into Hoax or LoLs.

Her past actions and deceit in making up hoaxes and BS stories has left no confidence and trust with the Owner and Admins, so they remove threads regarding her, and I suspect that there may be a few personal/internal related issues in regard to her and Springer.

At least people can still post on the threads and they weren't deleted off the site or locked, you still have the freedom to post and speak your mind and present any further proof that might warrant a new thread creation.

Now that is a good opinion, thank's for that most of us don't fully know about her past lies but that is something that perhaps deserves a thread in it's own right if they can be proven as that would then be a service to the community.

originally posted by: seentoomuch
Just went to her site and I see that she'll be on CoasttoCoast for three hours this Thursday night.

Did you listen to it?

a reply to: BigEyes

Linda is one of the best investigative journalists out there. At least we know what we are getting from her, whistle-blowers well vetted.

I always try to keep up with her work and I'm always astonished at the information.

I'm late to this topic, but new to watching LMH, so I thought I would add my two cents to this topic.

On and off my other half and I watch UFO documentaries. While very interested in UFO's we are tired of the standard documentaries that are floating around out there. This includes interviews and so forth. There are a lot of ego's out there and mixed with that, every single time we see something on Stanton F he spits out sometime about you can't do this from your arm chairs, yet we never hear anything new or anything different from the standard model, hmmmm. Roswell, Rendlesham it's always the same stuff that gets spits out from Ufologist to Ufologist, after all these years nothing changes. It leaves us wondering just what are they researching and who are they really working for?

We decided to start watching Richard Dolan to see if we could get new info. Not bad, easy to listen to, but again very little new stuff, and it's not necessarily new stuff we have to believe, just new stuff to chew on and think about adding another layer to UFO's. After the last Richard Dolan video we watched, I casualy said to my other half last week "I wonder if Richard Dolan is spitting out disinformation, mixed with true stuff" ..I can't remember what made me say that, I just did.

Then we decided to listen to LMH. You have to invest time into her. A lot of her vid's we've come across are very long. The first one we watched she started on the Roswell and Rendlesham path, my first thought was here we go again! We kept watching and she gave out new information we had never heard before. This caused us to watch a few more of her video's. What we have found is when she is talking in front of an audience, she is very monotone and hard to listen to, part of that I think she is nervous. But at times when she does not have an audience she is very animated and easy to listen. She seems far more relaxed and at ease. At least in the 3 video's we have watched so far, she has given us new material to think about, so for now we will keep listening. Many comments on here are in reference to her pay site. We are not members yet, I suspect down the road we may at least take a years membership and see whats behind the closed doors.

Since I'm the only one up, i' m just settling in to watch your first YouTube video, I hope it's interesting.

originally posted by: stealthyaroura
i always get images of old 80's porno movies when i see linda M H

she has that "porno face" weather thats a good thing or not i dunno?

If that was the face of 80's porn I thank God I've had limited exposure to it.
However, considering what she looked like back in the 80's, she's managed to maintain her image pretty well.
She looked and sounded like an old grandmother even back then.
She takes the art of monotone cackling and croaking to a whole new level.
Can I get a "qoute" on that?
Its an extra "special" word that is guaranteed to make you yawn and roll your eyes when you're listening to a niave and gullable fool that soaks up anything that has even the slightest scent of BS.
I must admit it is kind of nice that any radio shows/youtube channels even allow her to speak in public anymore.
Pity certainly does strange things to peoples judgment that's for sure.

She seems to me as an attention seeker,she comes off very arrogant,and can talk about herself for hours,I find her material boring and speculative for most part,comes off as a "know it all"

I could never get past the 1st 12 min of her,she talks about herself constantly,too much emphasis on her prior career,trys too hard to sell herself,very self promoting

Whether she actually believes these things or is just interested in getting traffic to her website (where there is a paywall to hide the supposedly good stuff) I'm not sure. She does seem to accept any personal testimony as absolute proof and not to confront any past errors she may have made regarding this testimony. Also, if I hear her mention "A Strange Harvest" one more time I will cry