Rachel Maddow tweets. BREAKING We've got Trump tax returns. Tonight, 9pm ET. MSNBC.

originally posted by: kosmicjack

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: kosmicjack

So now it "could" be a payoff. After you are asked to prove your statement?

Nothing to see here
Move along

You made the statement

Here's how it's a "thing". It's not our fault you can't grasp it:


link

Maybe quit flouncing and use the google next time?

404, file not found.......

originally posted by: stosh64

originally posted by: kosmicjack

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: kosmicjack

So now it "could" be a payoff. After you are asked to prove your statement?

Nothing to see here
Move along

You made the statement

Here's how it's a "thing". It's not our fault you can't grasp it:


link

Maybe quit flouncing and use the google next time?

404, file not found.......

It works for me.

Bribery, money laundering, and sanctions are key international risk areas for any global business, particularly those investing or operating in high-risk jurisdictions and industries. In addition to meaningful enforcement concerns, the potential reputational harm that accompanies these risks should not be underestimated as corruption cases are regular headlines in the international press.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: kosmicjack

Your link does not work.

Well now it is working.

Was this evidence?

Which of these crimes has Trump committed?

Is this thing on? lolz! Stop. Feel free to continue arguing via pm. Here's another link to make you crazy. I'll be waiting for my inbox to blow up.

www.miamiherald.com...

This link works. President Trump "blasts" MadCow/MSNBC today.
www.foxnews.com...

a reply to: kosmicjack

So which of these has trump done?

How did maddows release of 2 pages of trumps taxes connect to the links you posted?
Were proof of theses crimes in what maddow released? I must have missed that part. Was that before or after she showed us the in depth results of who parks what yacht where?

I think if Trump's real estate deal with that "Russian" was underhanded, it would have been cash.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Navieko

They ran it because at the end of the day MSNBC is a business. A business that runs on ratings. It didn't matter what was in the returns. They knew they could hype them up and see their ratings skyrocket. Let's be fair political ideology doesn't really matter when there's money to be made.

They may run on ratings, but when their principle audience is one that hates Trump with a passion and then they run with something that pretty much shows no dirt on him ... that's not good for future ratings. It leaves them with a black eye. Remember, Maddow is a pundit, not objective news. It would be like Limbaugh running with "BREAKING! We have Obama's real birth certificate" and then more or less admitting there's nothing weird there.

That's not what his audience tunes in for.

On the converse, he's not going to run with open birtherism, but he's not going to spend much time on it one way or the other, either.

a reply to: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Agit8dChop

Ha ha.

No it isn't .hahahahahahahahaha

It's illegal for the IRS to but not illegal for someone who finds a tax return.

Sorry....

www.law.cornell.edu...
26 U.S. Code § 6103 - Confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information

You might want to read that carefully. It applies to much more than just the IRS. It is very detailed, and the law covers just about every possibility. And every possibility covers anyone who ever had access to the tax returns and determines who legally has a right to access the information and under what circumstances.

I don't see anyplace in the law where it says the media has the legal right to reveal the information to the public.

originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: shooterbrody

Well played

a reply to: ketsuko

Let's be fair. People that regularly watch MSNBC probably won't be jumping ship over this. On the other hand we have people in this very thread that said they never watch MSNBC but they tuned in for this.

a reply to: Konduit

Many many memes will be borne of this madcow disease segment

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: ketsuko

Let's be fair. People that regularly watch MSNBC probably won't be jumping ship over this. On the other hand we have people in this very thread that said they never watch MSNBC but they tuned in for this.

Yes we tuned in to witness the utter humiliation of Madcow.
I also watched her cry on November 8th. That was fun too.

Meanwhile at the White House.

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: Konduit

Many many memes will be borne of this madcow disease segment

President Trump gives a speech today at 2pm ET. Hope he hasn't contracted MadCow disease. I want to hear updates on more important issues.

a reply to: Xcalibur254

People that regularly watch MSNBC probably won't be jumping ship over this.

So a very small number of people that watched the show will continue to watch MSNBC. Their ratings were pretty much in the tank.

The people that increased their ratings will most likely laugh and never watch again.

a reply to: Xcalibur254
I think "news" networks such as MSNBC play a bigger role in the advancement of political agenda's than you give credit for. Sure, one of the objectives is to grow a profit by way of upping the ratings - but if those that run the show at the upper most levels of these networks can grow enough that they can influence a good chunk of the populace into thinking the way they want - do you not think this more valuable to some than simply what good ratings can offer up?

Who knows what deals they have going on way up there beyond where the public can see -- but it's my belief that the MSNBC is just one of the many arms used by those pushing from the left in order to achieve their agenda. And right now, that's gotta be attacking Trump in any way they can. The problem is they got crappy pawns like Maddow doing their bidding for them at the moment.

Ok that's settled. Time to let President Trump do his job - run the country.

a reply to: UKTruth

Ok that's settled

No. A carefully selected partial tax return 12 years old, that happens to reflect a year that Trump paid a higher than usually tax rate doesn't clear up the questions of recent tax returns, that he promised to release, but won't.