Trump Tax Returns

a reply to: Metallicus

HE WAS NEVER REQUIRED TO SHOW THEM YES HILLARY SHOWED HERS BUT THEY PROVE NOTHING HAVEN'T YOU HEARD OF HAVING 2 SETS OF BOOKS. irs in not going to have any evidence in his or her tax returns why because neither one is that dumb.

a reply to: BubbaJoe

You are perfectly free to "think" whatever you please. I prefer to get information from people who have some on-the-scene information, people who have actually interacted with the guy for over 30 years. I know that seems like a crazy idea to some folks but it's the way I roll.

As BFFT has pointed out, lawsuits are a part of life when you have money. Somebody is always wanting it and willing to go to any lengths to try and get it.

I suppose his privacy is more important to him than your nosiness about how much money he makes.

originally posted by: D8Tee

originally posted by: BubbaJoe
I am sorry don't even want to make this comparison, but Bannon is 1932 Germany. I am a long time history buff, but this is a knee jerk reaction.

Who would you compare him to in that regime, lets see how a long time history buff answers.

Bannon is a racist ass, has been so for a very a long time, and yes Bannon is 1932 Germany. Bannon is a dick weed.

originally posted by: diggindirt
a reply to: BubbaJoe

You are perfectly free to "think" whatever you please. I prefer to get information from people who have some on-the-scene information, people who have actually interacted with the guy for over 30 years. I know that seems like a crazy idea to some folks but it's the way I roll.

As BFFT has pointed out, lawsuits are a part of life when you have money. Somebody is always wanting it and willing to go to any lengths to try and get it.

I suppose his privacy is more important to him than your nosiness about how much money he makes.

And you have that on the scene info, post your sources, I think you are blowing smoke.

ETA: He has no privacy at this point he is the president of my country. I want the f'n facts and if he is not willing to provide them he should just f'n resign. This man is a disgrace to the office of the President of the United States, and should be impeached at the earliest possible moment.

originally posted by: BubbaJoe

originally posted by: D8Tee

originally posted by: BubbaJoe
I am sorry don't even want to make this comparison, but Bannon is 1932 Germany. I am a long time history buff, but this is a knee jerk reaction.

Who would you compare him to in that regime, lets see how a long time history buff answers.

Bannon is a racist ass, has been so for a very a long time, and yes Bannon is 1932 Germany. Bannon is a dick weed.

So a history buff, but you can't come up with a name as to who he would be comparable?

originally posted by: D8Tee

originally posted by: BubbaJoe

originally posted by: D8Tee

originally posted by: BubbaJoe
I am sorry don't even want to make this comparison, but Bannon is 1932 Germany. I am a long time history buff, but this is a knee jerk reaction.

Who would you compare him to in that regime, lets see how a long time history buff answers.

Bannon is a racist ass, has been so for a very a long time, and yes Bannon is 1932 Germany. Bannon is a dick weed.

So a history buff, but you can't come up with a name as to who he would be comparable?

At this point Goebbels.

originally posted by: BubbaJoe

originally posted by: l007sb
a reply to: syrinx high priest

If there was a money transaction between Putin and Trump, it would have been uncovered by investigative journalists and reported in the media. It does not require Trump's income tax returns to find out. In fact, I would argue if there was such a transaction, it would not appear in his income tax returns because it would have been cash in Trump's pocket as a gift.

Income taxes are private, but they can be subpoenaed by Congress. Putin and Trump are not dumb enough to leave any trace of any such transaction. If there were such a transaction, it would have been in rubles which Trump can later convert to dollars, and it would be in cash as a gift and it wouldn't be an income to appear on an income tax return.

I agree it would not appear on Trump's tax return as "Gift from Putin", but there is much info to be gleamed from a personal tax return, especially if the Schedules are released with it.

ETA: I personally think Trump's tax returns show that he is not near as wealthy as he claims to be, and this is why he will not release them. They will reveal the big lie.

Far more information is included in his financials. Tax returns have no where near the detail of financials.


www.google.com...

originally posted by: BubbaJoe

originally posted by: D8Tee

originally posted by: BubbaJoe

originally posted by: D8Tee

originally posted by: BubbaJoe
I am sorry don't even want to make this comparison, but Bannon is 1932 Germany. I am a long time history buff, but this is a knee jerk reaction.

Who would you compare him to in that regime, lets see how a long time history buff answers.

Bannon is a racist ass, has been so for a very a long time, and yes Bannon is 1932 Germany. Bannon is a dick weed.

So a history buff, but you can't come up with a name as to who he would be comparable?

At this point Goebbels.

As i expected, not much of a history buff.
Sean Spicer would be Goebells.
Bannon would be best likened to Martin Bormann, someone you may not be aware of.

There is nothing Earth shattering in Trump's tax returns...I'm sure. The left is just grasping at straws for ammunition to call a good man out for every little thing. Even if it is 100% legal.

We used to call people like that pansies, sissies and pantie-wastes. Guess it still applies?

a reply to: BubbaJoe

Again, you are free to think whatever you please. My sources are members of my extended family who have worked with and for the Donald for over 30 years. They first met and got to know him when he bought Mar-a-Lago and needed an interior decorator. My relative's mother was recommended to him. He hired her and she has worked for him at various times all these years. He has also hired other family members and worked with them on charity events as well.
They say he is a fair and generous employer. I'm pretty sure the relationship would not have continued for over 30 years had he not been a good employer since her firm has no real need of clients.

No, I'm not going to reveal names on a public forum board. I believe that would go against ATS policy.

But your mind is made up because you "think" you know all about the Donald because the msm has told he is a bad guy. Now he wasn't really a bad guy when he wasn't running for president but when his hat went into the ring they decided to smear him six ways from Tuesday. Didn't you ever wonder why the hit pieces only started when he began his run for president? Nah, probably not because that would require critical thinking...and your thoughts are based on media blather published by people who have never even had a ten minute conversation with the guy, much less an in-depth interview.

originally posted by: Metallicus
So really my question is simple.

If the IRS has the tax returns and have no problem with them why the hell do you?

Seriously, with Obama's targeting of conservatives by the IRS I am sure that if there was even one thing wrong with his returns they would have nailed him by now.

So, basically, settle down...you still got nothing.

Mueller has all his tax information by now. If there is criminal activity it will be sorted out.

I am not worried about it. I do think, however, that with his history of money laundering, there might be something significant for investigators to find.
Link - USA Today

Money laundering was an issue for Trump's Taj Mahal Casino in Atlantic City, which was fined $10 million in 2015 for failing to report suspicious transactions.

Federal rules are designed to protect the U.S. financial system from being used as a safe haven for dirty money and transnational crimes, Jennifer Shasky Calvery, then-director of the U.S. Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCen), said at the time.

It was the largest penalty the agency ever levied against a casino since reporting requirements began in 2003, according to The Wall Street Journal.

"The Trump Organization admitted that it failed to implement and maintain an effective (anti-money laundering) program; failed to report suspicious transactions; failed to properly file required currency transaction reports; and failed to keep appropriate records as required by (the Bank Secrecy Act)," FinCen said in a statement.

November 15, 2017

Going once...going twice... GONE!

The outgoing commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) says the agency is planning to move President Trump’s tax returns into a new safe from their previous locked filing cabinet.

Full Article at: thehill.com...