WikiLeaks releases Vault 7!

a reply to: neutronflux

I don't think you understood what I was calling egocentric.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
For you fiction writers out there, a good novel series set with the dystopian alternate reality of where we'd be right this moment if WikiLeaks never existed could be some scary stuff.

Who needs fiction when reality is far more entertaining?
BIG BROTHER SEES YOU! WIKILEAKS VAULT 7 CIA SPYING 2017!


SHTF 2017

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

We would be right here. Vault7 simply is not big enough to affect things. 99% of the people around you outside of ats have no clue or give zero #s about vault7.

Even on these boards, the polarization of the members since the last election was a wonderfully executed move.

Googles vault7 12 hours ago and some of the first articles i found were rumors of a secret love affair between assange and pammy.

Simply not enough to change things.

Some media downplay it as " cia would not be c8a if they could not hack a phone"

Breaking news "cia can hack your tv"

Apple laughed it off saying everything in vault7 was already patched last update.

I was expecting v7 to be an absolute game changer that would force the world to pay attention and could not be downplayed.

Looks like it wont happen.


All this will be old/fake news in a week.

Honest question: Do terrorists typically own smart TV's?

a reply to: Golantrevize

This is a game changer, in many ways.

Will it get citizens up in arms? Lol, no. However, due to social media and this last election, many people as much more DO know something about vault7, in some regards.

To say they don't is old thinking, people are much more connected nowadays.

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
Honest question: Do terrorists typically own smart TV's?

Depends on who they're defining as "terrorists"...

I'm still catching up on reading so this may have been mentioned.

The thing that is really kind of worrying me is the tools they have "lost." If these are the same tools they use to create a Russian did it sig, what is stopping another country from doing something awful and creating a USA did it sig.? That is a very nasty tool for leaving those kind of footprints to have just floating around who knows where and in whoevers hands.

Nothing stopping other bad guys from turning the tables right back on us. How would we deny doing the bad thing and expect to be believed when no one believes Russia when they say they didn't do anything? Rather a sticky catch 22 when you look at the really big picture.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Maybe, in the very act of spying on anyone they shouldn't be, they are the real terrorists, whether they make themselves known in their hacking, as they did with me, or remain in quiet mode.

Could it be considered a "violence" the violation of one's right to privacy under the 4th amendment?

I thought they were only allowed to sift meta data in pursuit of legit terrorist threats... ?

Or did the Patriot Act and other legislation and executive orders just bypass that altogether.

Don't they still need probable cause of a crime before engaging in surveillance on a private citizen?

In other words, are they not caught red handed involved in breaking the law if the tools were ever used inappropriately? ie: on the masses.

a reply to: onehuman

Good point! Precisely. Maybe instead of the whole MSM promulgated Russia hacked the election meme, we would have all been better served if they caught whoever killed and whoever ordered the killing of Seth Rich. Julien Assange still has a reward out for information leading to the capture of said killer or killers. Why would he do that I wonder..

It's high time to clean the satanists (theistic, ritualistic, abusive and evil satanists) right out of the system.

Another leak please WikiLeaks. Bring down the pedosatanists and save the children.

This could be their way of paving the way for that big big world changing one, but this, in and of itself, is HUGE and suggests that the CIA have been spying on ever-larger groups or spheres of the populace, without legal authority or by an illegal and unauthorized twist on the authority given in the Patriot Act.

Crazy stuff!

Big brother is watching you!

They came after me once for taking a run at Obama on Reddit.

It's not fun at all when it happens, because you wonder who and what you're caught up with and you get the distinct impression that they do not have your own best interests at heart.

But don't worry, because it always blows back on them in seen or unforeseen ways every time and they pay a heavy price for their evil and wickedness.

Therefore we must pray for our enemy and any and all who might persecute us in the name of what is right, and in so doing be counted as sons of God who are merciful towards them - now there's a good one if you want to really punk them HARD!

originally posted by: Golantrevize
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

We would be right here. Vault7 simply is not big enough to affect things. 99% of the people around you outside of ats have no clue or give zero #s about vault7.

Even on these boards, the polarization of the members since the last election was a wonderfully executed move.

Googles vault7 12 hours ago and some of the first articles i found were rumors of a secret love affair between assange and pammy.

Simply not enough to change things.

Some media downplay it as " cia would not be c8a if they could not hack a phone"

Breaking news "cia can hack your tv"

Apple laughed it off saying everything in vault7 was already patched last update.

I was expecting v7 to be an absolute game changer that would force the world to pay attention and could not be downplayed.

Looks like it wont happen.


All this will be old/fake news in a week.

Maybe yes, maybe no. "Year Zero" is only the title of Vault 7 part 1 of who knows how many.
True nobody cared when I brought it up to them on social media. And it doesn't help twitter taking down all related hashtags that are trending. Nor does the media even recognize it as legit, using words like "alleged", and "claims".

At the very least we can make use of the release to make patches for as many vulnerabilities as we can. Nothing to sneeze at since the whole thing is at it's core about privacy. The other is how it can be applied outside of itself, in relation to current affairs (russian hacking, obama spying, whatever they can).

Let there be no mistake, if they're as smart as we give them credit for, the Trump administration will make the most of this for months if needed.

True story

Also this is interesting to say the least. Fits a certain agenda does it not ladies and gents?

CIA has 5 test covert 'listening post' servers called 'PocketPutin'



And then there's this.
Former CIA boss blames millennials for leaks
@ 1:23
www.youtube.com...

a reply to: Arrestme

"Year Zero" is a clue, not in reference to a series of numbers, but the Year ie: THIS year, 2017.

This is "year zero" in WikiLeaks POV and this is a heads up, that there's much much more where this came from, as the white hats gang up on the black hats and leak away at the corruption in their midst.

He's already sitting on it, not only the rest of this leak but the next and the next after that.

Year Zero is this year - 2017.

This will bring in a trove of new leaks I think. Vault 7 - I wonder what that means. It's a code also.

Is this the 7th major such publication of material - probably.

He'll be releasing the pedosatanist stuff for sure, I don't think people need be concerned with that, and as I said before, Anonymous is probably already using some of these tools in a concerted hacking of certain people in certain networks, and once a portion of the structure goes down the rest will follow in a chain reaction.

Assange I think is an atheist and a pure rationalist, but he really thinks these things through all the way, and then times them while handing out little clues.

Vault 7.

7 is typically a set contained in a 10 number series, because by Vault 11, 12, , you start to yawn and lose attention.

So I predict that in YEAR ZERO we will see the rest of Vault 7, then Vault 8, Vault 9, and then finally Vault 10.

A Vault implies the secure storage of the data ie: it's already in his possession.

I hope he does it FAST, while continuing to observe world events to help facilitate the timing.

Here is looks like he took his cue from Trump in a way.

March 4th would have been a good date to choose, because it's the only day in the calendar that's also a command.

Year Zero implies the end of history as we know it.

Vault 7, eh? There's also the seven seals of the apocalypse and "Year Zero" doesn't sound quite optimistic either.

a reply to: AnkhMorpork

That's very possible when you explain it like that.

Tho the WikiLeaks tweet says
twitter.com...

"To unpack Vault 7, part one: "Year Zero", on a Mac, you can use this '.7z' unarchiver"

-which to me at the very least implies it will be a series. Whether Year Zero is the name of this part or just a "clue" for the whole series, for the sake of arguing, I suppose can go either way.

Also Assange was quoted saying “If any year could be said to be the ‘year zero’ of our modern era, 1979 is it”. Though this too could be seen as an assumption, it does seem to fit the theme of this particular release. Anyways I guess we'll just have to see.

Curious how many dollars down the drain this leak will be a costin' the CIA...

For all you late nighter's:





www.abovetopsecret.com...

When Wiki-leaks released the series of DNC/Podesta/Hillary e-mails, the ATS threads were full of information that average people could read and say, "Oh my God! The Democrats are DIRTY!"

Even though this leak of CIA documents is being covered very well by the Mainstream Media, right here on Day 1, it's not having the same emotional effect on the public. Average, Non-ATS People hear it being discussed on CNN, FoxNews, etc, but aren't emotionally charged by CIA spying, or the covert methods used.

Maybe today was just the warm-up.. to set the stage, by giving background of how the forthcoming SHOCKING INFORMATION was gathered?

a reply to: carewemust

Well the files are mostly all just coder haxor data's. Uber dry.

Another part of the problem is half the voters are emotionally whipped into pro-CIA fervor thanks to the election etc melodrama fallout.

HOWEVER, this thing should be going off every bit a big as Snowden ever did.

So I wonder if this would count as a "scandal" under Obama's "scandal free" presidency? Hmm, since they don't count the NSA thingie towards such a score sheet, nor anything else He did / that happened under Him, maybe not....