WikiLeaks releases Vault 7!

a reply to: IAMTAT

Apparently?

You have a view that others don't?

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: PRSpinster
a reply to: IAMTAT

You know, there is a computer you can purchase online that hacks Teslas, right? I know this bc I was driven to the point of fury re: someone who owns a Tesla. He did an unforgivable act and before my moral compass kicked in, I researched how I could get him. This CPU allows you to, say, disengage the braking system, cut off the engine, kill the steering, etc, etc. I'm not going to link to it bc I feel that is irresponsible but it does exist. My point is, you don't need CIA to hijack Tesla.

I'm glad you didn't link it.
I'm also glad I don't drive a Tesla.

And refrained from trying to kill someone. The world appreciated your self control.

CNN refusing to cover this and put in on their front page (like everyone else) tells me everything I need to know... This story is explosive and not a peep, but Fox, BBC and so many others have it as their number 1 story... CNN is beyond full of sh*t, and I'm glad that Trump treats the whole network and their reporters like horsesh*t

originally posted by: jhn7537
CNN refusing to cover this and put in on their front page (like everyone else) tells me everything I need to know... This story is explosive and not a peep, but Fox, BBC and so many others have it as their number 1 story... CNN is beyond full of sh*t, and I'm glad that Trump treats the whole network and their reporters like horsesh*t

Well who's been pushing the Russia angle? Their argument is destroyed and have zero creditability. The genuine meaning of fake news.

originally posted by: jhn7537
CNN refusing to cover this and put in on their front page (like everyone else) tells me everything I need to know... This story is explosive and not a peep, but Fox, BBC and so many others have it as their number 1 story... CNN is beyond full of sh*t, and I'm glad that Trump treats the whole network and their reporters like horsesh*t

I used to think that CNN stood for Clinton News Network. But lately I'm thinking that "CIA News Network" more aptly sums it up. They are totally owned & operated by the Deep State apparatus.

originally posted by: jhn7537
CNN refusing to cover this and put in on their front page (like everyone else) tells me everything I need to know... This story is explosive and not a peep, but Fox, BBC and so many others have it as their number 1 story... CNN is beyond full of sh*t, and I'm glad that Trump treats the whole network and their reporters like horsesh*t

I just checked and I can't believe you are right! Not because you are unrelieable, its just defies logic that CNN would not report on this, especially when they know that everyone will know of the story and know they aren't reporting it.

So CNN standards.

1. Wikileaks releases evidence of CIA overreach, including that they have spied on Americans, have let cyber weapons be stolen, etc. CNN doesn't even feel that this is worth a mention.

2. A document circulating that almost no serious news outlet will report on that claims Trump had hookers pee on Obamas bed. This to CNN is breaking news worthy of hours worth of coverage.

Once more, CNN proves they are not a news organization, but a mouthpiece for the democrats and the deep state.

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: interupt42

originally posted by: z00mster
a reply to: queenofswords

I read Samsung smart tv's that have a microphone for Skyping. And as for mobiles: both iOS and Android phones have been compromised.

Don't forget about Alexa from Amazon and just about every other device with electrical components that you are not aware of.

Samsung, Android, iOS, Alexa...the speech recognition software for all of them comes from Nuance Communications.

Link

A quick search shows Nuance's Global Operations Vice President, Eric Tinch, worked for nine years in the CIA (Field Operations/Special Operations). Link

Funny how conspiracies are completely surrounded by coincidences , nothing to see here.

a reply to: Grambler

Right. This is the important part. Thats why I have been saying from the get go that I want to see evidence that Russia hacked the DNC. I am not just going to take the ICs word for it.

Nor will I think the CIA framed russia until I see proof of that.

I wish others were as reasonable. Many on the Right are running with the narrative that the DNC was hacked by the CIA and the CIA setup Russia.

a reply to: jhn7537

how do you really feel about CNN though? lol loved your comment jihn

a reply to: Grambler


I just checked Twitter... search "wikileaks, vault 7 and cnn"... everyone is questioning their refusal to cover this.. Eventually, they will need to address this, seeing as everyone else is. If anything, they are looking for a way to spin it before they release anything. That's the only way I can explain this....

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Grambler

Right. This is the important part. Thats why I have been saying from the get go that I want to see evidence that Russia hacked the DNC. I am not just going to take the ICs word for it.

Nor will I think the CIA framed russia until I see proof of that.

I wish others were as reasonable. Many on the Right are running with the narrative that the DNC was hacked by the CIA and the CIA setup Russia.

I know there are people who jump to conclusions on both sides.

I will say I haven't seen any main stream journalists or politicians make this claim.

However, I have seen almost every politician and journalists believe that Russia did hack the DNC without seeing any evidence.

Whats gets me is all of these journalists claimed that they were lied to about the Iraq war, and yet they are willing to accept the IC claim of russia whole heartedly without seeing any evidence.

Its on thing for lowly folks like us to rush to judegment; we have no real power and are just having a discussion.

But you are absolutely right; people on all sides should wait for evidence before rushing to judgement.

originally posted by: jhn7537
a reply to: Grambler


I just checked Twitter... search "wikileaks, vault 7 and cnn"... everyone is questioning their refusal to cover this.. Eventually, they will need to address this, seeing as everyone else is. If anything, they are looking for a way to spin it before they release anything. That's the only way I can explain this....

They are probably waiting for their CIA bosses to tell them what to say.

Without a doubt, this proves CNN are just a deep state mouthpiece.

a reply to: jhn7537

I just checked Twitter... search "wikileaks, vault 7 and cnn"... everyone is questioning their refusal to cover this.. Eventually, they will need to address this, seeing as everyone else is. If anything, they are looking for a way to spin it before they release anything. That's the only way I can explain this....

The same people that question why CNN does not have this on their front page are also those that call CNN "fake news" when they do cover a story.

It's fake, dishonest outrage coming from dishonest people.

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Grambler

Right. This is the important part. Thats why I have been saying from the get go that I want to see evidence that Russia hacked the DNC. I am not just going to take the ICs word for it.

Nor will I think the CIA framed russia until I see proof of that.

I wish others were as reasonable. Many on the Right are running with the narrative that the DNC was hacked by the CIA and the CIA setup Russia.

I think that is not that the case. What many are saying is that scenerio is JUST as likely a possibility as the Russians hacking the DNC with what is known up to now.

Hackers specifically alter their initial entry hops purposely to hide their hops and or to purposely leave footprints where they want to appear they came from.

Ok people can somebody be kind to tell me is the wikileaks information is out and what happen

I just came back from doing things and tried to look on all the pages this thread had grown and found only that some news don't want to cover the story and the CIA is involved.

originally posted by: jhn7537
CNN refusing to cover this and put in on their front page (like everyone else) tells me everything I need to know... This story is explosive and not a peep, but Fox, BBC and so many others have it as their number 1 story... CNN is beyond full of sh*t, and I'm glad that Trump treats the whole network and their reporters like horsesh*t

It'a on the front page of the mobile site, second story under Top News. Relax.

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: jhn7537

I just checked Twitter... search "wikileaks, vault 7 and cnn"... everyone is questioning their refusal to cover this.. Eventually, they will need to address this, seeing as everyone else is. If anything, they are looking for a way to spin it before they release anything. That's the only way I can explain this....

The same people that question why CNN does not have this on their front page are also those that call CNN "fake news" when they do cover a story.

It's fake, dishonest outrage coming from dishonest people.

Wait, the fcat that CNN will not report the biggest story of the day is somehow justified because people call them fake news?

The people calling them fake news do so because they seem to be a mouythpiece for the dems and deepstate and against Trump. So the fact that they won't report a story that goes against the deep state further proves that ther are not interested in news, they are interested in pushing an agenda.

There excuse pushing the "Trump "dossier" thaat dealt with urine fetishes was that it was news and people had the right to hear ot (even though almost every other outlet had that story and thought it was so shady they couldn't reprot it).

So if the people have the right to hear news, why not report on the wikileaks?

originally posted by: Rosinitiate

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: jhn7537

I just checked Twitter... search "wikileaks, vault 7 and cnn"... everyone is questioning their refusal to cover this.. Eventually, they will need to address this, seeing as everyone else is. If anything, they are looking for a way to spin it before they release anything. That's the only way I can explain this....

The same people that question why CNN does not have this on their front page are also those that call CNN "fake news" when they do cover a story.

It's fake, dishonest outrage coming from dishonest people.

Really? That's rich!

Yet, true all at the same time.

This feels oddly like a family reunion/intervention of the left and throw in an Agatha Christie style rich uncle die invite everybody over for the reading of the will and suddenly a murder!

Anyway, let's hope apathy doesn't settle in like its the new national pastime. Bring it on Julian!