Former NIST employee, Peter M. Ketcham, says publicly that NIST "is not fooling us anymore".

a reply to: ColdWisdom

The short response from my friend at NIST is:

Sounds like damage control to me. Very negative response from a member of NIST.

Corrupt people hate whistleblowers show me one that likes them?

How do you not give a second thought to seeing a steel framed skyscraper that free falls all the way to the bottom (for the first time in history)?

Especially a scientist or engineer.. It baffles me.

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: ColdWisdom

The short response from my friend at NIST is:

Sounds like damage control to me. Very negative response from a member of NIST.

Corrupt people hate whistleblowers show me one that likes them?

Except that this guy isn't a whistleblower

a reply to: nOraKat

How do you not give a second thought to seeing a steel framed skyscraper that free falls all the way to the bottom (for the first time in history)?

You do know the exact same thing happened to a steel tower in Tehran earlier this year, albeit a much shorter one. This one didn't even have a plane fly into it, it just caught fire.

a reply to: nOraKat
Because NIST PBS and Snopes said it happened
that way. So let's play our part and suspend physics
as well as our analytical brains .

a reply to: ColdWisdom

Problem w video link

a reply to: nOraKat

originally posted by: CB328
I wonder if people will still be excited about this if they find evidence that Bush or Cheney was behind it???

It was the neocons that did it. They told of their plan before it happened. Read Project for a new American century. They said they needed a new "Pearl Harbor" incident so they engineered it.

double post

originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: nOraKat

How do you not give a second thought to seeing a steel framed skyscraper that free falls all the way to the bottom (for the first time in history)?

You do know the exact same thing happened to a steel tower in Tehran earlier this year, albeit a much shorter one. This one didn't even have a plane fly into it, it just caught fire.

And of course AE911 are forced to claim that this building was intentionally brought down because the collapse shares many features that they claim are the signs of an inside job and controlled demolition

a reply to: ColdWisdom

Call me a conspiracy nut but I wonder if this was done to prove a point - which is that steel framed buildings/skyscrapers can / do indeed collapse from a fire. I don't think its happened before this, but who knows, I never researched it, though I have heard many people say a modern skyscraper has never fallen due to a fire, and there has been at least a few with some serious fires.

Also the look of this building looks pretty bad/cheap. Wonder how it was constructed?

Anyway thanks for the link.

It does not at all sway my opinion of what happened on 9-11 due to all the other evidence (like nano particles found in every sample of dust, produced from super-high temperature reactions like that of thermite).