The AG is required to represent the US government in legal matters and is required to comply with EO's.
The AAG's own staff signed off on the EO as lawful and constitutional. The judges ruling and the AAG's opinion arent the same thing and dont agree
with each other, contrary to your claims.
edit on 1-2-2017 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)
Oh, lord, the judge didn't do anything that was not already part of the original EO, valid visas where accepted., the EO is still enforced,
suspension of new visas.
Another activist judge trying to get a spot in the media.