It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: AdamHeiman
This is a rather weak argument since the USSR no longer exists. Why does their legal decisions/missteps matter today?
originally posted by: Neith
a reply to: AdamHeiman
I have always thought that it should. They speak Russian as a majority. It seems logical to me.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: AdamHeiman
So? The legal body that defined the law you are disputing doesn't exist anymore. There is no one to dispute the legality of said claim or argue it in court. So it is irrelevant to today's politics.
This is like saying that the US should return all the land it exists on to the natives because we illegally stole it from them in the first place.
This is like saying that the US should return all the land it exists on to the natives because we illegally stole it from them in the first place.
originally posted by: AdamHeiman
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: AdamHeiman
So? The legal body that defined the law you are disputing doesn't exist anymore. There is no one to dispute the legality of said claim or argue it in court. So it is irrelevant to today's politics.
This is like saying that the US should return all the land it exists on to the natives because we illegally stole it from them in the first place.
Natives didn't have law let alone a constitution. Natives killed each other for land and resources.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: Krazysh0t
This is like saying that the US should return all the land it exists on to the natives because we illegally stole it from them in the first place.
Not even. The indigenous people of the Crimean Peninsula, Crimean Tartars, were removed to Uzbekistan (mainly) by Stalin's order in 1944. What the OP clearly wants to ignore is that Russia is a signatory of the Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances.
originally posted by: Neith
a reply to: AdamHeiman
I have always thought that it should. They speak Russian as a majority. It seems logical to me.
Trump is right. Crimea should be part of Russia
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Neith
a reply to: AdamHeiman
I have always thought that it should. They speak Russian as a majority. It seems logical to me.
So Canada should be split up into parts of France and Britain while the US is divided between Britain and Spain since the majority spoken language implies which country is in charge right?