BREAKING: FBI Director Implicated In Trump/Russia Collusion Scandal, Senate Investigation Possible

a reply to: Diisenchanted

Yes he didn't run for re-election. He did it for the good of the dems. He didn't want to suck up all the money, and he said it wasn't because he would have lost.

a reply to: seasonal

Of course Reid thinks that Comey should resign. There is a question to why Comey reopened the email investigation into Clinton. Reid feels that Comey helped get Trump elected.

I have a feeling Comey knows where a lot of skeletons are hidden... one huge "gate" comes to mind. Apparently Reid and his cronies are worried that Comey is going rogue.

a reply to: seasonal

I was saying before the vote that if the reps lose it would be 12 or possibly 16 years removed from the white house with georgie being the last it seemed like they were doomed. Tables have turned fast.

Once upon a time J Edgar Hoover was the most feared man in DC because of all the dirt he had on everyone.

Comey has defended Hillary going back to the Whitewater hearings. Does Harry Reid really want to shake Comey to see what falls out? Because I am willing to bet he knows more than just The Clintons due to all the connections.

Get Comey to sing like a canary and there will be some serious scorched earth going down.

a reply to: Ahabstar

Be careful what you wish for, Reid......

"In the Kingdom of the Blind...the One-eyed man is King."

heavyeditorial.files.wordpress.com...

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: seasonal

the bipartisanreport.com is a fake news site.

scroll down to the b's
Unstrustworthy "Fake" News Sources

Are you actually being serious here????

You do know that ATS is on that list too right?
Why is CNN not on there why is NBC not there??
Or any of the other MSM media channels, not 1 MSM source is on that list.
You really think anyone should believe that site?

a reply to: everyone

Right, I guess we should allow others who are so much smarter that us to tell us where we should get info from.
I prefer to make my own way. I decide what I read and pass onto members, and of course everyone can decide not to look at the thread.

originally posted by: EightAhoy

originally posted by: seasonal
Obama called for a full investigation into Russian influence of the election.

If all the news stories these past 24 hours indicating the President knew about this influence in September aren't fake, click-bait news, would that mean he was lying to us when he made this statement ahead of the election?

Check out specifically at 3:14 what he says

There is no way the election can be rigged and that it has been rigged or has been in the past is what he says

a reply to: everyone

So things can be rigged when centralized...???

Banks are centralized, the Fed is centralized. Who could have guessed?

So in other words Reid is scared to death of an investigation into his illegal actions and will do what it takes to go after Comey in order to distract from his probable upcoming criminal investigation. Attack the FBI now to make it easier to say Comey / FBI planted evidence out of revenge for the new administration to use against him.

When exactly did the Democratic party become ok with running their affairs as if they were an organized crime syndicate?

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: everyone

So things can be rigged when centralized...???

Banks are centralized, the Fed is centralized. Who could have guessed?

Well my actual point was that Obama first at the time when they were still confidently telling themselves and the public that Trump would not win that rigging the election is not possible. It was not possible now and it never has been possible, that was obama's claim.

Right now since trump won Obama is claiming that it has been rigged and calling for a investigation from the CIA no less.
The same organization that told us that there were WMD's in iraq

or that we are defeating ISIS , we all know what happened with that
or what about all the "Intel" the cia provided us with about bengazhi ?
The CIA is a politicized intelligence group. Not a defense organization that much should be clear to the people in the U.S by now.


They have been making the claim that russia hacked (paper ballot voting states) the election on and of ever since it started dawning on them that their pre-selected president was not going to win (hillary). Not once did Obama call for a investigation then no, he waited until AFTER the election so apparently he if you follow obama's own narrative he let the russian go about their business (obama's claim not mine) and not prevent it from happening but only now when the election has passed he wants to call for a investigation into it.

Would have been a lot more sane to do this BEFORE the election instead of afterwards now with January's inauguration of trump coming up. Maybe he really is trying to give himself some sort of third term because this is just suspicious to say the very least.


We had evidence leaked about hilary and the podesta's , we dont have any evidence of russian hackers (especially not in paper ballot voting systems ) and he never called for a investigation about that, not once. No instead without demanding a investigation he simply came out and called it fake, "Fake news" that "hurt real people. Why

investigate hillary right? (barrack never made a stance about that,he never bothered with that, he himself was involved in it)
Why investigate podesta's e-mails right?
We can just believe old barack hussein when he simply decides that there is nothing to it, right?
It all does not add up and smells so badly of corruption even pigs can't stand the smell.

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: everyone

Right, I guess we should allow others who are so much smarter that us to tell us where we should get info from.
I prefer to make my own way. I decide what I read and pass onto members, and of course everyone can decide not to look at the thread.

I am not entirely sure what you were saying there with that. I was asking him if he was serious about that because that site is claiming to know what is fake and what is not fake news and that that whole site with their list is a bunch of BS created to propagate this idea of "fake news" which just happens to be comprised of sources that do not support the liberal "proggressive" democratic party and also that somehow all the MSM channels are missing from it.

Or am i misunderstanding you and you support the claim of that list? From what i have seen from you on ATS so far i find that very hard to believe so for now i will just conclude we had a misunderstanding between us about this.

To be clear on my stance about it, That site with their list of so called "Verified Fake News" IS fake.

The Democratic Party got onboard the Clinton Lie Machine and now they are unhappy about arriving at the destination that took them to.

Months ago I expressed the opinion that the FBI vs The Clinton Lie Machine would not work out well for Mrs. Clinton.

Mr.Comey deserves credit for not sacrificing the integrity of the FBI to serve Mrs. Clinton and her corrupt agenda.

The First Chief Directorate of the KGB and its inheritors have been influencing US politics for a long long time.

That is nothing new.

There not going to investigate a dam thing with Trump and the GOP holding the reigns of power.

Obama and Reid are smoking dope.

Its too late ass hole Obama should have don’t something when he had the power to do something which in a week HE WONT.


Nobody’s going to investigate a dam thing

Its over
This Nazi type lunatic madman is coming to power and nada will stop it.

All of this is Obama’s sorry ass trying to save face.

He always was a spineless wimp who wouldn’t risk nothing for anything so all this is crap

The stupid son of a bitch should have NEVER put Comey in office in the first place,

a reply to: Willtell

Still using Democratic talking points I see.

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Willtell

Still using Democratic talking points I see.

Oh Really

Calling Obama an asshole is a democratic talking point?


Maybe if you would get out of the automatic thinking gear you might understand something once in a while

a reply to: Willtell

So when you said this

Its over
This Nazi type lunatic madman is coming to power and nada will stop it.

you werent referring to Trump but were instead referring to Obama? I ask because that rhetoric, using nazi, is a democratic talking point against Trump.

Maybe you can clarify for the rest of us what exactly you meant and who exactly you were referring to?