Mars. Three objects at the same distance from each other. The forgotten smoking gun?

Meanwhile over at Cydonia Mars


a Funny thing Happend ... that was Over Looked




Behold with Circles to show some kind of markers

They the Dots " Markers " are Not exact Equal Distance ..

they could of been, like 400,000 years ago ...
land slide Shift ... perhaps

a reply to: enjoylife

Looks artificial to me, or imaging glitch, the later seams unlikely though, would be more glitches.

originally posted by: LABTECH767
Well all I can really say is if they were on earth would you look twice or even argue that they may or may not be artifact's.

There are at least two things that I remember seeing (both on the Moon) that I thought look artificial, one being the photo you posted and another something that looks like a lozenge on an Apollo photo taken from orbit. When I look at photos from any place I don't look at them from different perspectives based on the location, although I consider the location to compare to similar places, so when I see something that I think looks natural that means that it looks as natural on Mars as on Earth or the Moon, and the same thing happens when I think something looks artificial.

I would argue that Sidonia does look artifical, that there are many feature's but we each have our own opinion's, as I can not prove mine beyond a doubt neither can you, you have the luxury however of being in line with the official consensus on that subject but as you know yourself not even all scientist's agree with that point though to go on record can bring them into disrepute with the entrenched and established opinion of there community and even cause them to lose standing if not worse.

It's not a luxury, it's just a coincidence, as my opinion is based on my own thoughts and knowledge.

Remember these in Egypt which May or May not be pyramid's perhaps older and even bigger than Giza's three titan's.
www.dailymail.co.uk... rger-Giza.html

Those look like natural features to me.

originally posted by: MagicCow
I have to say that I completely disagree with you on
everything you have ever written towards mars.

Everything? Including that Mars has an atmosphere?

It seems all you see are rocks.

And sand, don't forget the sand.

you never even are moved to think something could be there..

You don't know that.

It's very interesting of you.

Yes, I'm an interesting person.

a reply to: ArMaP

No worries my friend.
Still love you - always will.

a reply to: LABTECH767

Eyesight playing tricks on you as you get older auld yin, nice rock pictures why don't you name the missions or the file numbers so we can look at the hires scans and then you can join dots and colour in pictures like a young child

originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
the distances between the centre of each one is 373 and 383 pixels... they are not in a straight line.

can you explain 'the centre of each one'... is the centre the Apex or high point of each feature ??

next off.... the distance varies 373 & 383 pixels... would the variation of distance be accounted for by the curvature of the Mars ? I take it that the center feature was used as the base & the left feature was 373 pixels distant & the right feature was 383 pixels distance from the central (base) feature

interesting sleuthing there

I haven't posted here in a very long time, I'm more of a lurker but this thread caught my attention. Is it just me or do the 3 "dots" remind anyone of Orions Belt?
I'm not sure but I think there was a theory that the pyramids of giza was reminiscent of Orions Belt when viewed from above.

Just my two cents

a reply to: St Udio

Obviously casting a 2d line over a 3d surface will only be straight if you are directly over the 3 images. So, say the objects were oriented a little above the photo angle, then the 'real' line would be curved and intersect all of the points. Who knows, they may be perfectly aligned.

originally posted by: EndOfDays77
Please can we stop using this image(first one pictured below) it is upside down and is only showing the shadows and not the objects in Question themselves.

That image is not upside down, that image has north at the top, as if we were looking at a map.

The objects do align (inverted) displayed correctly.

You don't need to invert them, just use what looks like the brightest point of each.


And no, they aren't at the same distance from each other, there are 84 pixels from the leftmost to the middle one and 82 pixels from the middle one to the rightmost one.

I've put a yellow circle where I think the sun direction could be coming from. There are possible reflections off the objects, with shadows cast behind them? Shadows and illumination direction are the same for the terrain in comparison.

You don't need to guess where the sun was coming from, that information is provided on the page for the photo.

North azimuth: 93.03°
Sun azimuth: 36.74°

North azimuth

In a raw or unprocessed MOC image, this is the angle in degrees clockwise from a line drawn from the center to the right edge of the image to the direction of the north pole of Mars. This number allows the user to determine "which way is north/south? and which way is east/west?"
In the Planetary Data System cumindex.tab file, this datum is called NORTH_AZIMUTH and is found in column 41.

Sun azimuth

In a raw or unprocessed MOC image, this is the angle in degrees clockwise from a line drawn from the center to the right edge of the image to the direction of the sun at the time the image was acquired. This number allows the user to determine "which way is the sun coming from in my image?"
For images that have been map-projected so that north is to the top of the frame, the sun azimuth can be determined relative to north by subtracting the north azimuth from the sun azimuth. The resulting number (positive clockwise) gives the sun azimuth relative to the top of the frame.

In the Planetary Data System cumindex.tab file, this datum is called SUB_SOLAR_AZIMUTH and is found in column 42.

So, in the image below (not map-projected), the North azimuth and Sun azimuth would be like this:


If we rotate the image so North is to the top, we get this:

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: enjoylife

Interesting. Any chance it's a stitched image and the three objects are actually just one that occur where the image is stitched? That or a possible camera glitch?

I will keep an eye on this thread as it does look really abnormal to me. How do you know they are exactly 800 feet apart?

I am usually not convinced so much by moon mars anomalies although some have perplexed me but i dont see how the stitched photo's theory could work if you take the surrounding areas around these objects into account. They are unique around all three objects no matter what perspective you look at them.

a reply to: enjoylife

Very strange, looks artifical.
I belive Mars was host to advanced life once, alot of things there.

Also this reason

youtu.be...

Add the three nearly equidistant unknown features on the surface of Mars in the OP to the now very long list of what needs to be checked out first hand by manned missions. What an incredible adventure awaits out there for a humanity that can get its act together.



For me, most of the weird anomalies on Mars, while intruiging, just aren't sufficiently convincing for me to consider them smoking guns proving artificiality. The below square, however, and the apparent open-cut mining activities on the Martian surface come pretty close.



Ancient Mining On Mars?



All this craziness here on Earth we humans seem to have such an alarming taste for is nothing compared to the exquisite, joyous fun of exploring our own backyard right here in the solar system. Who knows, it could turn out to be the ultimate journey of self-discovery.


Mars and Beyond?

Great topic! Lots of info! I hate to jump in here with a bit of pseudo-science, but if you are a believer in remote viewing check out... farsight.org... the remote viewing of the Cydonia region.

Here's more from a thread by mikesingh.....

originally posted by: mikesingh
What do we have here? Peculiar objects and formations that do not appear to be natural. Or perhaps the geology of Mars is such that it manifests itself in distinct patterns and objects as can be seen in the images below? Thought I'd share this with you. So here goes....

1. Strange Objects - Equally Spaced.

Here’s an image of Mars taken from the Opportunity camera in Jan 07.

Opportunity Sol 1070
Courtesy: NASA/JPL

There are six objects you can clearly see that I’ve marked in red squares. They are all equi-distant! Can this be possible in nature? Are they just stones lying around, or are these artificial constructs? (There are more objects in a straight line in the original Opportunity image which I have cropped).


2. ’Craters’ – Lined Up

This next image is a question mark. The exact location is unknown, but somewhere near 86.8°S, 341.3°W . This is an area termed ‘Anomaly 502’. Note the ‘craters’ on the upper right of the image on the left. The B/W pic on the right is purportedly a radar contour image of the same area where one can clearly see the ‘craters’. But they all seem equally spaced! Rare for a natural phenomenon!



3. Strange Parallel Furrows

These are in the form of parallel ‘tracks’ that run up the mountains from the valley floor, following the contours of the terrain in Candor Chasma. Though it’s a 3-D overlay, it does not explain why these have formed. The image joint which is in a straight line is also clearly visible below the ‘tracks’. So these ‘furrows can’t be the result of the joint.

Source image:

4. Trench / ‘Canal System’

Here’s a pic of the Cydonia region of Mars. Notice the parallel walled trench. Was it part of a canal system that is now in ruins? Probably a defunct hydro system?

Courtesy: ESA/DLR/AOL

Cheers!

www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: OrionHunterX

I remember that thread, and, if I'm not mistaken, the first photo shows marks left by the rover when it did half-turns to "look" left at the position from this photo was finally taken, next to a crater.

The second is meaningless, as it doesn't have any real reference, and the third is the result of mapping a 2D photo with some imaging artefacts (the stripes) on a 3D model.

I don't remember any thing about the fourth.

PS: most of those Mikesingh threads showed nothing special, but they were always interesting.

originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: OrionHunterX

I remember that thread, and, if I'm not mistaken, the first photo shows marks left by the rover when it did half-turns to "look" left at the position from this photo was finally taken, next to a crater.

The second is meaningless, as it doesn't have any real reference, and the third is the result of mapping a 2D photo with some imaging artefacts (the stripes) on a 3D model.

I don't remember any thing about the fourth.

PS: most of those Mikesingh threads showed nothing special, but they were always interesting.

but But!! you didnt mentioned anything about my Post!

this one here
www.abovetopsecret.com...


buyt hey i like your effort about the 3 objects in question ...

doing the measuring distance thing ... which i could end it to Meaningless

as a Possible Land Slide in the Area, a Sudden Shift..

but what are these Objects Anyway ???

to bad we can place a Rover some where in Cydonia

like near the Face or The Pyramid DM Mound ..

which Earth has some similarity's in Man Made Mounds in IRAN

which i find Amazing ...

hey just maybe Mars Had Always been a Barren Planet ...

but it doesn't Mean the Possibility it was a Base, an Outpost

from some other Sentient Life From Outside Our Solar system ..

say 400,000 years ago .. around the Time when modern man Has showed Up
on Earth...

So what im saying is ... Im Open ... in those Possibility's

We dont understand of all the Ancient Mysteries and Wonders on Our planet yet ..

originally posted by: Wolfenz
but But!! you didnt mentioned anything about my Post!

this one here
www.abovetopsecret.com...

That's because I don't see any reason to say any thing about it.

So what im saying is ... Im Open ... in those Possibility's

We dont understand of all the Ancient Mysteries and Wonders on Our planet yet ..

That's why I am also open to all possibilities, not being so may result in ignoring the real explanation.

originally posted by: ArMaP

originally posted by: Wolfenz
but But!! you didnt mentioned anything about my Post!

this one here
www.abovetopsecret.com...

That's because I don't see any reason to say any thing about it.

So what im saying is ... Im Open ... in those Possibility's

We dont understand of all the Ancient Mysteries and Wonders on Our planet yet ..

That's why I am also open to all possibilities, not being so may result in ignoring the real explanation.

So your saying ...... you dont see an Anomaly here ?

what is Circled




and you can go to any NASA website and it will show these dots ,markers, what ever you want to call them
going around this so called Natural Mound..
and what are the ODDs of that ?

from what i see...


It looks uncanny familiar with this MAN MADE Mound
Named Tepe in Malik Shah Iran
Here on Earth ..

a reply to: enjoylife

NASA, masters at bolstering public support for their missions.
Doctor some images, leak 'em to the public and then deny everything
they wanted you to see in the first place is even there. Because it isn't.
It's the classic bait and switch that dangles false evidence in regards to
what men want more than anything. Proof of any gods/aliens or just
anything. Lizards, snake, stone, anything that leads men away from
belief in the one true Creator. Surely not all of you are so ignorant
that you can't see this is what NASA is doing?