It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: introvert
Question: What regulation would he enforce that is not already being enforced?
That's a valid question. Accidents happen. Doesn't make what was said right, but it's hardly illegal.
originally posted by: TheBulk
originally posted by: RomeByFire
originally posted by: Jefferton
And if course, the right has been nothing but respectful towards the current president.
Oh how quickly the hypocrites forget.
My thoughts exactly.
I've seen people call for the murder of not only Clinton but Obummer, too.
Funny how quickly the tables flip. But since it's against the monolithic and ruthless evil libtards - no one cares.
There was a movie made about assassinating Bush and all kinds of memorabilia you could buy in regards to that topic.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
No. The Bush years really didn't start this current period of extreme partisanship. Apparently you've just started following US politics
originally posted by: TheBulk I think we can say CNN is definitely racist against a white president.
originally posted by: theirfaceslie
Slander is not protected under the first amendment. CNN could legally be forced to go bankrupt after perpetuating lies that they knew was designed to assassinate Trumps Character
originally posted by: s3cz0ne
originally posted by: theirfaceslie
Slander is not protected under the first amendment. CNN could legally be forced to go bankrupt after perpetuating lies that they knew was designed to assassinate Trumps Character
Yeah I have a very hard time believing that could or would ever happen....