It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: seasonal
The story doesn't get into whens. Is there more than 1 of this headless art work.
originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: seasonal
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
Look closely at the picture of the victim and compare it to the work of art.
The victims arms are bent sideways and the knees are tucked. The only similarity is that their backs are bent backwards and that's IT.
Stop flooding the forums with all this noise.
One pizzagate thread per week is enough.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: seasonal
The story doesn't get into whens. Is there more than 1 of this headless art work.
Her Wikipedia profile lists two, the one in Canada and one in the Centro Andaluz de Arte Collection.
Not sure how Podesta has this if it is in a museum. Are we certain that is his home being depicted and not the museum itself?
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: seasonal
Okay, I found this:
Married, With Art.
This article was written in 2004 and does appear to be their home. They no longer own this piece as it is in Canada.
Folks attending a house tour in the Lake Barcroft neighborhood in Falls Church earlier this year got an eyeful when they walked into a bedroom at the Podesta residence hung with multiple color pictures by Katy Grannan, a photographer known for documentary-style pictures of naked teenagers in their parents' suburban homes.
"They were horrified," Heather recalls, a grin spreading across her face.
Stemming from her interest in the physical, emotional, and psychological aspects of pain and fear, Bourgeois was drawn to the arch of hysteria as theorized and represented by the nineteenth-century neurologist Jean Martin Charcot (1825-1893). While working at the Salpêtrière Hospital in Paris, Charcot sought to represent hysteria by documenting the performances of his female patients. The physical tension of the hysterical arch - an intense muscular contraction, resulting in immobility and paralysis of the limbs - is emblematic of an equally extreme emotional state. Bourgeois makes this highly vulnerable position even more so by suspending her male figure from the ceiling. In choosing to represent him in an attitude traditionally associated with the female, the artist transgresses the social and sexual roles assigned to women, challenging the misconception of hysteria as a female malady.
Oh, gotcha. I doubt it. It appears she was working on this in 1991-1992 from what I read and Dahmer's trial began in 1992 so I cannot imagine that she had the victim trial photos prior to this.