It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: uncommitted
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Instead of the passer by killing the person, why do you think he didn't try to physically restrain him? Don't you think that would have been doing the right thing?
originally posted by: mr-lizard
originally posted by: uncommitted
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Instead of the passer by killing the person, why do you think he didn't try to physically restrain him? Don't you think that would have been doing the right thing?
Because America.... If this was England the guy would have had his arse handed to him and he'd be sitting in a cell nursing his wounds now with a hefty fine / jail sentence. Whereas Americans genuinely believe the only answer is by shooting people.
Assaulting a cop is utterly stupid and the guy was obviously dangerously moronic, but did he deserve to die? No of course not.
A jail sentence or a beat-down is temporary, a shooting is permanent. Somebody lost a son.
originally posted by: sg1642
I know every situation is different but why is the first instinct for the cop or a passer by to shoot to kill? Couldn't the cop have used pepper spray or a baton?
I'm not trying to blame the police here far from it. And does it really take 3 shots to stop an assault?
originally posted by: Kukri
Bad guy dead, officer gets to go home to his family, passerby becomes hero but with a heavy burden. I see two living victims and one less scumbag to deal with.
originally posted by: mr-lizard
originally posted by: Kukri
Bad guy dead, officer gets to go home to his family, passerby becomes hero but with a heavy burden. I see two living victims and one less scumbag to deal with.
What if that dead scumbag was your brother, son, father or whoever having a bad day? Mentally ill or hooked on drugs or any number of issues. Most people in the right mind don't go attacking policemen do they?
Would you so gleefully wooing over your comic-book style good-guy vs bad-guy rubbish then?
But then again, I'm probably barking up the wrong street here. I expected nothing less.
originally posted by: mr-lizard
originally posted by: uncommitted
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Instead of the passer by killing the person, why do you think he didn't try to physically restrain him? Don't you think that would have been doing the right thing?
Because America.... If this was England the guy would have had his arse handed to him and he'd be sitting in a cell nursing his wounds now with a hefty fine / jail sentence. Whereas Americans genuinely believe the only answer is by shooting people.
Assaulting a cop is utterly stupid and the guy was obviously dangerously moronic, but did he deserve to die? No of course not.
A jail sentence or a beat-down is temporary, a shooting is permanent. Somebody lost a son.
originally posted by: mr-lizard
originally posted by: Kukri
Bad guy dead, officer gets to go home to his family, passerby becomes hero but with a heavy burden. I see two living victims and one less scumbag to deal with.
What if that dead scumbag was your brother, son, father or whoever having a bad day? Mentally ill or hooked on drugs or any number of issues. Most people in the right mind don't go attacking policemen do they?
Would you so gleefully wooing over your comic-book style good-guy vs bad-guy rubbish then?
But then again, I'm probably barking up the wrong street here. I expected nothing less.