Donald Trump to Re-Open 9/11 Investigation

originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: MALBOSIA

I'm not 100%, but there is some report somewhere that has 28 pages redacted. They recently were released but completely redacted, I think.

Lol. I always thought they were talking about the commission report. I read your link but it only says congressional report. Good thing I wasn't an investigator eh?

originally posted by: _BoneZ_
Any of the "Daily" sites like "Daily Star", "Daily Mail", etc., are tabloid sites. Look at the other headlines on that site. Please use a real source. Posting articles from hoax/tabloid sites does no good other than spread their garbage around the net, and give them more page views, which creates more fake BS stories.

There's a scale of unreliability and the Daily Mail is far more reliable than the Daily Star. The DM is a right-wing rag that exaggerates when it thinks it can get away with it, and generally trolls its readers (hence having the highest readership of any UK paper, online or off). The Star is an irrelevant comic.

originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: intrptr

Building 7 to me is still THE smoking gun. It fell at demolition type freefall speed, and it is indeed on video.

After the twin towers fell, there was no water pressure to fight the fires in 7. It burned for 8 hours before finally collapsing. What speed you expect it to collapse at?

There was no evidence of explosive demolition components in any of the rubble.

Speculating over the collapse of the skyscraper after the attack, he said: “How do two planes take out three buildings on the same day? “I never got my head around the fact that nothing is mentioned about the destruction of Building 7 in the 585-page document.”

Now how about that . It could be one of the biggest achievement from the last decade.
I wonder if he can convince the senate who majority now is republicans if I recall that right?

a reply to: intrptr

Yea, and it fell uniformly, like there wasn't building 6 in the path between it and the towers. The fire was also media friendly by consuming it conveniently in a manner that fire has never ever done to a building previously. It made certain floors get so hot that the building failed, even though the structural skeleton was built to resist those temperatures.

a reply to: BlackProject

Are there any other sources besides the "Daily Star"?

I'd like to post this elsewhere but that source doesnt instill me with much confidence.

If anything would get Trump taken out, I'm sure re-opening this investigation will be the last straw... The shear magnitude of 9/11 and the people involved would never allow this to happen... But who knows, I never truly thought they'd allow him to gain a US presidency, so maybe this has "legs" after all... I guess Trumps lucky to have secret service on his side 24/7 soon... I feel uncomfortable discussing these topics online, let alone being the person opening a damn investigation... lol

a reply to: BlackProject

Since he's "the man" in real estate in New York City...can someone show us how much he was responsible for rebuilding the area by owning or partially owning those companies "contracted" to rebuild?

Im sure Im not the only one curious about that....thanks

I think Donald Trump stands a good chance of getting himself assassinated.

originally posted by: jhn7537
I guess Trumps lucky to have secret service on his side 24/7 soon...

All presidential candidates were given Secret Service details during the campaign, and strangely enough it didn't stop two genuine assassination attempts.

With the media demonisation of Trump showing no sign of abating, it would hardly be a great surprise if there were some deranged latter-day Travis Bickle out there, probably in the south or west, preparing to 'save the world' singlehanded. Let's hope the SS don't leave the keys under the mat, so to speak.

The commission never investigated how Rudy Giuliani came to know a steel building is going to fall from fire well in advance, as early as in the morning itself. (the pancake theory etc came later). Also, how Rudy was instrumental in destroying evidence by shipping overnight most of the melted steel.

But Rudy is Trump's right hand..

Also, the alphabet agencies (CIA, NSA , FBI, etc) prefer Trump , so the conspiracy around assassination by Alphabet agencies is moot in this point, they got their man in the highest office, why would they take out their own man ?

originally posted by: VimanaExplorer
by shipping overnight most of the melted steel.

Exactly what melted steel are you on about?

oh boy oh boy oh boy you have a new elect president who is calling for a new investigations into 911 weeeeew that is something big if true , and if its true then here comes JFK part two

originally posted by: intrptr

originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: intrptr

Building 7 to me is still THE smoking gun. It fell at demolition type freefall speed, and it is indeed on video.

After the twin towers fell, there was no water pressure to fight the fires in 7. It burned for 8 hours before finally collapsing. What speed you expect it to collapse at?

There was no evidence of explosive demolition components in any of the rubble.

Well less than freefall is the speed it should have fell at. Simple physics. It was actually NIST who confirmed freefall speed by the way. If someone can explain how that is physically possible due to fire damage it would be interesting to read

That is funny! He has a point on this one. I never thought this kind of thing would happen.

a reply to: Vector99

It never burned that way before because usually fires are put out except in extenuating circumstances, like on 911.

That there was no water pressure to fight the fire and it burned unchecked for 8 hours and what little effort was undertaken by then mostly exhausted responders...

The several floors affected were burned office by office, theres video of that. It took all day to finally compromise the structure.

a reply to: sg1642

Well less than freefall is the speed it should have fell at. Simple physics.

Explaining that should be simple then. But the meme doesn't require any explanation. Like building foot prints and nano thermite, just repeat "free fall" oft enough and people buy it.

But don't ever mention endless war, after 911.

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: sg1642

Well less than freefall is the speed it should have fell at. Simple physics.

Explaining that should be simple then. But the meme doesn't require any explanation. Like building foot prints and nano thermite, just repeat "free fall" oft enough and people buy it.

But don't ever mention endless war, after 911.

The point is the body of scientists who wrote part of the actual explanation of the collapse of the buildings have stated themselves that the building behaved in a way that is physically impossible.

The fact is even if there was an investigation and proof came out and then people admitted it, nothing would happen. There would probably be a few riots but nobody would actually care anymore and I doubt anyone would even be prosecuted.