It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: AshFan
That's the problem I have with religion. They want you to surrender your mind and let them tell you what's right or wrong, depending on their version of right or wrong.
originally posted by: BlueAjah
I'm pretty sure that killing babies is not in line with Church doctrine.
So, of course they don't want people to end up in hell for voting for baby murderers.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: network dude
vote correctly! Jesus is watching you.
I thought that was Santa?
In response, the Roman Catholic Diocese of San Diego condemned both pieces, saying the Church does not tell members how to vote in elections and emphasizing that those who vote for Democrats are not automatically damned.
“It’s not a mortal sin to vote for Democrats, number one. And number two, the church doesn’t take positions on this, and we’re not going to,” diocese spokesman Kevin Eckery told the Union-Tribune.
The diocese also said the Oct. 16 insert was not approved by the parish or any of its priests.
“For all I know someone thought that they were doing a service,” Eckery said. “The pastor said it was not something he had reviewed or approved.”
As for the Oct. 30 article, Eckery told the Union-Tribune it was unclear who wrote it and who gave the clearance for it to be printed in the bulletin.
The diocese also said the Oct. 16 insert was not approved by the parish or any of its priests.
“For all I know someone thought that they were doing a service,” Eckery said. “The pastor said it was not something he had reviewed or approved.”
As for the Oct. 30 article, Eckery told the Union-Tribune it was unclear who wrote it and who gave the clearance for it to be printed in the bulletin.
The diocese also said the Oct. 16 insert was not approved by the parish or any of its priests.
“For all I know someone thought that they were doing a service,” Eckery said. “The pastor said it was not something he had reviewed or approved.”
As for the Oct. 30 article, Eckery told the Union-Tribune it was unclear who wrote it and who gave the clearance for it to be printed in the bulletin.