It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Another group of snake oil sales persons milking the faithful for cash and ratings. Keep fantasy with fantasy and science with science.
How much do your plates really tell about you, your life, your hopes, dreams, thoughts...
originally posted by: frenchfries
a reply to: Harte
Indeed you're right AAH is a all a HOAX
case closed ...
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Harte
Yeah I shot myself in the foot with that. Just scratch it.
What I believe how we should look at it is taking the myths into account, the flood is in there, so at least it's not a bad clue if a story is in "the book". Just from a standpoint where it's apparent there is some kind of religious evolution, stories develop, get adapted, integrated, amun still present in amen...
We are distracted nowadays, we watch TV, smartphone games, chats, we barely are alone with our mind. Because we can agree on they must have been doing something right # is #ing impressive.
And it really really really bothers me I don't get to know what they found in the labyrinth. Myths say what they always say, the fate of the world stands written there.
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: frenchfries
Oh frenchy *hugs
I think it's also noteworthy we do even in a best case scenario "know" stuff from looking at shards. How much do your plates really tell about you, your life, your hopes, dreams, thoughts...
I see you never get tired of pretending posters said something they didn't say. That is the straw man fallacy and is typically used when there is no logical argument to make.
originally posted by: frenchfries
a reply to: neutronflux
It seems in theory, it would take the energy output equivalent to our Sun's to put a modest size vessel into a warp field. Or is it hyperdrive? Or ludicrous speed? I forget?
you do understand that your response is pure theory.... but why use an oldfashion warpfield ?
Somewere in an undisclose location of this galaxy aliens solved the problem by changing lightspeed... well they still travel at sublight speed but locally C is much much higher... duh einstein never told us why C was a constant... and no-one seems to care
back to Ancient aliens , well you don't need that much energy to travel (physics) without a force applied to an object there is no accelleration so... you only need energy to accelerate F=m*a... if you travel to Proxima-b cbs news ... it would take 40 years or more so even with human limited tech traveling to the stars is no-problemo...
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Harte
Pretty sure our life is different. How could you tell what it's like in a world where spoken stories are the only entertainment?
Where most of the time you do physical work in silence.
originally posted by: PeepleThe story teller, priest who visits your village once a week is the only source of inspiration.
People are less civilised. It's dirty. Everybody is doing magic.
I couldn't tell what that state of mind implies. Various things, I assume.
But "same" is not true. Compared to whom?
originally posted by: everyone
originally posted by: frenchfries
a reply to: neutronflux
It seems in theory, it would take the energy output equivalent to our Sun's to put a modest size vessel into a warp field. Or is it hyperdrive? Or ludicrous speed? I forget?
you do understand that your response is pure theory.... but why use an oldfashion warpfield ?
Somewere in an undisclose location of this galaxy aliens solved the problem by changing lightspeed... well they still travel at sublight speed but locally C is much much higher... duh einstein never told us why C was a constant... and no-one seems to care
back to Ancient aliens , well you don't need that much energy to travel (physics) without a force applied to an object there is no accelleration so... you only need energy to accelerate F=m*a... if you travel to Proxima-b cbs news ... it would take 40 years or more so even with human limited tech traveling to the stars is no-problemo...
Traveling to A star. And that would still not be "not a problem" because thus far you only took travel speed into consideration. How about actually managing to get there in one piece? And back again. So all in all it would take us minimum of 80 years too travel to and back from just 1 star. The first next star would be even further away. Now lets move on to the goal of traveling to a planet of which we think there might, potentially, maybe , life. Which is even further away. thee time we done all that and with 100% success which is extremely doubtful we will be centuries further along and the tech we send out already at least a hundred years old.
originally posted by: Harte
originally posted by: everyone
originally posted by: frenchfries
a reply to: neutronflux
It seems in theory, it would take the energy output equivalent to our Sun's to put a modest size vessel into a warp field. Or is it hyperdrive? Or ludicrous speed? I forget?
you do understand that your response is pure theory.... but why use an oldfashion warpfield ?
Somewere in an undisclose location of this galaxy aliens solved the problem by changing lightspeed... well they still travel at sublight speed but locally C is much much higher... duh einstein never told us why C was a constant... and no-one seems to care
back to Ancient aliens , well you don't need that much energy to travel (physics) without a force applied to an object there is no accelleration so... you only need energy to accelerate F=m*a... if you travel to Proxima-b cbs news ... it would take 40 years or more so even with human limited tech traveling to the stars is no-problemo...
Traveling to A star. And that would still not be "not a problem" because thus far you only took travel speed into consideration. How about actually managing to get there in one piece? And back again. So all in all it would take us minimum of 80 years too travel to and back from just 1 star. The first next star would be even further away. Now lets move on to the goal of traveling to a planet of which we think there might, potentially, maybe , life. Which is even further away. thee time we done all that and with 100% success which is extremely doubtful we will be centuries further along and the tech we send out already at least a hundred years old.
It would take 1500 Earth years to visit half the stars in the Milky way even if you could travel instantly (no time at all) from star to star. And then you would only have one second at each star before you had to move on.
And that's using the lowest estimate of stars in the galaxy - 100 billion.
Of course, that's just one ship. Divide that number by the number of interstellar "instantaneous travel" ships that might be coordinated to fully explore half the galaxy.
And multiply the number by the number of seconds you think an explorer would take at each star.
Harte
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: Harte
originally posted by: everyone
originally posted by: frenchfries
a reply to: neutronflux
It seems in theory, it would take the energy output equivalent to our Sun's to put a modest size vessel into a warp field. Or is it hyperdrive? Or ludicrous speed? I forget?
you do understand that your response is pure theory.... but why use an oldfashion warpfield ?
Somewere in an undisclose location of this galaxy aliens solved the problem by changing lightspeed... well they still travel at sublight speed but locally C is much much higher... duh einstein never told us why C was a constant... and no-one seems to care
back to Ancient aliens , well you don't need that much energy to travel (physics) without a force applied to an object there is no accelleration so... you only need energy to accelerate F=m*a... if you travel to Proxima-b cbs news ... it would take 40 years or more so even with human limited tech traveling to the stars is no-problemo...
Traveling to A star. And that would still not be "not a problem" because thus far you only took travel speed into consideration. How about actually managing to get there in one piece? And back again. So all in all it would take us minimum of 80 years too travel to and back from just 1 star. The first next star would be even further away. Now lets move on to the goal of traveling to a planet of which we think there might, potentially, maybe , life. Which is even further away. thee time we done all that and with 100% success which is extremely doubtful we will be centuries further along and the tech we send out already at least a hundred years old.
It would take 1500 Earth years to visit half the stars in the Milky way even if you could travel instantly (no time at all) from star to star. And then you would only have one second at each star before you had to move on.
And that's using the lowest estimate of stars in the galaxy - 100 billion.
Of course, that's just one ship. Divide that number by the number of interstellar "instantaneous travel" ships that might be coordinated to fully explore half the galaxy.
And multiply the number by the number of seconds you think an explorer would take at each star.
Harte
Oh yeah, what if our FTL drive had a built-in time travel component? What do you say about that!