Texas County Switches to Paper Ballots after Electronic Voting Glitches

originally posted by: imjack
a reply to: pteridine

Nothing about what you said provides accuracy. Faster? Redundant? Sure.

I'm calling bulls### that a machine makes more counting errors than a person.

I'm also calling bulls### that paper voting isn't susceptible to fraud, if not even the exact same types of Fraud.

At least a paper ballot can be read (in most cases) whereas an electronic one cannot.

What the hell is the purpose of the 'scanning' if it doesn't even work?

This usually happens when someone's trying to game the system.

If your issue is 'hard copies' what do you call the thing the machine pri at the end?

What it prints and what it tallies might not be identical.