White House Coordinated on Clinton Email Issues, New Documents Show

From the article at The Hill helpfully provided above ... (chosen as the least biased in representation of the several options).

The White House communications director and her counterpart at the State Department discussed the matter in March 2015, shortly after the story broke that Clinton had relied on a private server, the Wall Street Journal reported Thursday.

So, these "bombshell" emails do indeed show coordination on handling the press fallout AFTER the story about the email server broke.

AFTER.

originally posted by: Noobarino
This is criminal. How can one look at the people pleading the 5th, the people being granted immunity, and the investigations being blocked by the DOJ, and not see that this is a criminal cabal ??!!

In the US legal system (not sure where you are located so no offense) the ultimate decision to prosecute is the sole discretion of the prosecuting attorneys.

You could take a gun and go kill your neighbors and confess to the police and they can send the report to the prosecuting attorney and the PA could say no, we wont prosecute.

The DOJ lawyers / AG have that authority.

While the actions of Clinton were illegal the refusal to prosecute is not unless you can link the DOJ decision makers to a quid pr quo setup. AG Lynch meeting with Bill Clinton could be an example of that. Comeys links to the Clintons and the Clinton Foundation could also be an example.

Director Comey and the movie A Few Good Men both hit on the base for prosecuting -

It doesnt matter what the person knows it only matters what they can prove.


ETA - or like Gryphon66's post above as an example.

a reply to: [post=21341806]Xcathdra[/post

Of course you can connect a quid pro quo when you take into account the recent revelations that Obama participated in using the illegal servers under a pseudonym. They are covering each other's asses because they know if Hillary goes down, Obama is guilty of the same charges

The e-mails already prove this....we just need someone who will actually conduct justice...instead of blocking it

originally posted by: Gryphon66
From the article at The Hill helpfully provided above ... (chosen as the least biased in representation of the several options).

The White House communications director and her counterpart at the State Department discussed the matter in March 2015, shortly after the story broke that Clinton had relied on a private server, the Wall Street Journal reported Thursday.

So, these "bombshell" emails do indeed show coordination on handling the press fallout AFTER the story about the email server broke.

AFTER.

So I looked into and you are right. Here is a relevant link.

Clinton, a potential presidential candidate in 2016, has come under criticism after the New York Times reported on March 2 that she exclusively used a private email account (registered to clintonemail.com) to conduct government business while secretary of state from January 2009 to February 2013. At the request of the State Department, Clinton two months ago turned over 55,000 pages of emails that involved government business, the Times reported.

Obama was asked about Clinton’s emails during an interview with CBS News correspondent Bill Plante on March 7.

Plante, March 7: Mr. President, when did you first learn that Hillary Clinton used an email system outside the U.S. government for official business while she was secretary of state?

Obama: The same time everybody else learned it through news reports.

Obama’s answer to Plante begged the question of whether the president emailed Clinton and, if so, how did he not know Clinton was using a private account? Two days after the president’s interview aired on CBS, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest clarified that the two leaders, obviously, did exchange emails and he knew her email address.

Earnest, who made his remarks at about 44:45 into his press briefing, said the president didn’t know that she had a personal email server and did not have a government account.

www.factcheck.org...

So the emails in question in the OP were from Obamas people on like March 17 or sometime in late March.

This was after the news broke, in which Obama said he learned of the emails.

So I was wrong, this does not prove that Obama lied about knowing about the emails.

Yes I know,iit is shocking to everyone, but it turns out I am not infallible.

I do think that the story in the Op is still important, which I will post in a minute why.

a reply to: Grambler

It's been a "fallible" couple of days, G.

I suppose it keeps us honest.

a reply to: Grambler

So I was wrong, this does not prove that Obama lied about knowing about the emails.

But Obama did email Clinton long before saying that he only learned about her personal email setup through the news.

So he is still a liar, even if he did use a pseudonym for some of the emails.

a reply to: tikbalang

So what you got against Clinton, mason?

She's a lying,conniving,career cess pool politician that doesn't care about anyone else but herself, and her 'fortune, and glory'.

That is the tip of the iceberg.

HRC represents EVERYTHING inherently wrong with capitol shill.

a reply to: butcherguy

Further the White House had to be given Clintons email account so the White House computer systems wouldnt block emails from her account.

SPAM removed by admin

originally posted by: mike35667
a reply to: SoulOfCeres

email what is that?

Email is what Clinton used to bypass FOIA Laws and to jeopardize our national security by sending classified information out in violation of the espionage act.

SPAM removed by admin

a reply to: stoprefugeesillegal

Here comes a Zika Virus Map thread.

My impression is the coordination between Obama administration and Hillary Clinton about the presidential campaign in early 2015, the Benghazi cover-up never really stopped. My understanding is that President Obama talked to Hillary Clinton on her unsecured email server using an alias and that the same was true for Hillary, to others. The only logical reason for this is that they knew that the server was insecure. Meaning the argument made by the FBI Director nonsense.

This of course was validated by Wikileaks in various emails and shown on several sites. The only question that is left for me is, why is such a cover-up permitted, since if I can figure it out, others in Congress and the Administration can too.

It follows that Obama's administration must support Hillary Clinton in order to keep Obama's involvement (visibility to a minimum) in order to protect his image.

I think this is super relavint

The media is doing it best to down play this. In order to help Hillary win.