It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: HawkeyeNation
Did Trump break any tax laws? Did he? It's a legitimate question. He did not from understanding. So please tell me why this is even discussion. He is a business man and his job is to make money. It is not his fault that the idiots write these laws.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
While i think he is repulsive in many ways, i cannot blame him for taking advantage of tax breaks worth a fortune. I, too, blame the complete lack of reasonable governance given to us by prior thieves in washington.
If we don't like rich people not paying taxes, then we can fix it. And not by getting mired down in stupid arguments over birth certificates.
originally posted by: HawkeyeNation
It is not his fault that the idiots write these laws.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
While i think he is repulsive in many ways, i cannot blame him for taking advantage of tax breaks worth a fortune. I, too, blame the complete lack of reasonable governance given to us by prior thieves in washington.
If we don't like rich people not paying taxes, then we can fix it. And not by getting mired down in stupid arguments over birth certificates.
What Mr. Trump did on his Tax Returns was Perfectly Legal
Well, maybe Clinton didn't just try to change laws Trump used, but actually got them changed, when she was in the Senate in 2002.
According to a Tuesday column by Lee Sheppard in the tax industry publication Tax Notes, Trump may have benefited greatly in the 1990s from a tax loophole related to forgiven debts — a loophole that would have allowed him to deduct business losses on his personal income tax return, even if those losses were actually borne by banks that loaned Trump money and never got it back.
People often use "loophole" to refer to tax deductions they don't like, but this one was a loophole in the true sense of the word: a tax break created by legislative accident.
This loophole was the subject of a 2001 Supreme Court case, Gitlitz v. Commissioner, in which the IRS argued the relevant tax law could not have possibly meant what it appeared to say, which was that business owners could in some cases deduct losses they had not actually borne.
After the IRS lost that case, the loophole was closed by the Job Creation and Worker Assistance Act of 2002, a bill that then Sen. Hillary Clinton voted for and President George W. Bush signed. But that law only stopped taxpayers from using the loophole going forward; they were still allowed to benefit from tax losses they had booked through it in prior years, such as 1995.