1 billion people affected because of sea level rise before 2050

a reply to: galien8

The estimation that 1 billion people are affected comes from a ATS comment in another post.

Where did the claim that 1 billion people would drown come from?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: schuyler

No.
The OP just shows that some people cannot read a chart.

Yes.
Climate change is fraught with fraud and disinformation. EXPLAIN why UEA did this:

originally posted by: Ghost147
It's 100cm not meters.
The opening paragraph says between 50cm to 1.5 meters by 2100.

Or did I miss something?

Oh thank God, the picture was in meters :-( I corrected it

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: galien8

The estimation that 1 billion people are affected comes from a ATS comment in another post.

Where did the claim that 1 billion people would drown come from?

I made it up

originally posted by: jappee
That would be 1 billion people, that saved us from themselves.

ehem...100cm

Oh thank God, the picture was in meters :-( I corrected it

a reply to: schuyler

Their green marker ran out of ink perhaps

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: galien8

Did you notice the portion of your graph indicating height is in centimeters and not meters?

Most thing I noticed is that that report is a year old and is closed for discussion..doesn't seem to be signed off either, usually George Monbiot's field of errant PC.

originally posted by: Phage
Unless they are very slow walkers, they won't drown.

Rising sea levels will cause a lot of problems. Drowning is not one of them.

What rising sea levels ?

Getting tired of hearing these idiots cite rising sea levels, let us know when it actually starts rising, then maybe anyone will care.

But here in calif only the rich can afford beach property.

I live in the desert at 2200 feet above sea level so i am not worried.

a reply to: schuyler

EXPLAIN why UEA did this:

I did.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Now, explain why your chart says it represents global temperatures when the dataset is for tree proxies in northern latitudes? Not temperatures. Not global.

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: galien8

So, the best place to be for this monumentally slow 33 year non-event is on a boat or ship?...or maybe just roll your jeans up to your knees?

Build me an ARK worthy of Rotterdam

originally posted by: artistpoet
a reply to: schuyler

Their green marker ran out of ink perhaps

Hi I'm just a guy who made a mistake, but I corrected it



anyways according to

science.sciencemag.org...

it can be up to 45 meters but in a couple of centuries time

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: galien8

Did you notice the portion of your graph indicating height is in centimeters and not meters?

Most thing I noticed is that that report is a year old and is closed for discussion..doesn't seem to be signed off either, usually George Monbiot's field of errant PC.

anyways according to

science.sciencemag.org...

it can be up to 45 meters but in a couple of centuries time

originally posted by: ParasuvO

originally posted by: Phage
Unless they are very slow walkers, they won't drown.

Rising sea levels will cause a lot of problems. Drowning is not one of them.

What rising sea levels ?

Getting tired of hearing these idiots cite rising sea levels, let us know when it actually starts rising, then maybe anyone will care.

HELP!!! It has risen 20 cm since pre industrial time (1890 A.D.)

Oh boy..... I think I'll still be alive by that point.