NYC blast believed to be Intentional Act

a reply to: tigertatzen

Pathetic post content aside, this is not anything we did not already know. Bombs are not typically set off by accident. They're always intentional.

Why are you giving the OP a hard time about highlighting the fact the Mayor of New York and police statements all over the news are making a huge point about this being deliberate? The fact is we know this was deliberate what are they pushing that fact so much?

And to the poster who alluded to this being an Islamic Terror attack, [ColaTesla] are you not aware that terror attacks are not always carried out by Muslims (in fact those that do commit terror acts are widely acknowledged to not be real Muslims)?

a reply to: yo_da84

there was no indication the blast was linked to terrorism

So what else would you call someone who planted a bomb? I would call them a terrorist.

Is this Mayor on the same planet as the rest of us?

originally posted by: starlitestarbrite

originally posted by: yo_da84

NEW YORK CITY — An explosion that injured more than 20 people in Manhattan's Chelsea neighborhood was an "intentional act" but there was no indication the blast was linked to terrorism, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio said.

"Tonight, New York City experienced a very serious incident," the mayor told reporters at a late Saturday press conference.

"There is no evidence at this point of a terror connection," de Blasio said, citing preliminary information.

Investigators also did not believe the New York City explosion was linked to a pipe-bomb style blast in Seaside Park on Saturday, the mayor added.

NYC blast believed to be intentional Act

Reported at several places now

I read this on FB out loud to my husband sitting next to me
I saw "International" the first time I read it.....I said what the hell is international act?
I re -read it and it said intentional.... trick of the eye maybe? So strange.

Mandela effect actually

Kidding!

I can't believe it was on purpose tho! The nerve of some pipe bombs...

a reply to: djz3ro

to the poster who alluded to this being an Islamic Terror attack, [ColaTesla]

Now that its several hours after you posted this, Please remind me again who turned out to be the terrorists that carried out this attack? ...

SPAM removed by admin

Yo_da84 is after all just the 'messenger'

I suppose the content she/he exposes is the real annoyance, I think the aggression is directed there, not towards Yo_da84, lets clarify.

a reply to: Plotus

Thanks Plotus, was beginning to feel like I had started some massive Hate campaign over an autocorrect and sharing news. God forbid I was only trying to help and spread the word, maybe it could have helped put someone in touch with a relative in the area or something...

Anyway, back on the topic

Wow - we can't even call a bomb going off in NYC an act of Terrorism now? What has this world come to?

Yep..... in this climate leading up to elections and perceived positions to maintain, up is down and down is up.
Just perhaps........ we are much more astute than they give us credit for.

So now, they can just barely even admit right out of the gate that a manufactured bomb is "intentional"???

Can't even say it's "terrorism", because I mean...there's so many OTHER reasons to make a bomb, right?

How many had money on the guy behind these bombs being named "Mohammad"? Anyone? LOL....

Still can't believe we can't seem to say "Radical Islamic Terrorist" which is exactly what this is, and we all damn well know it....

Removed Spam