Whats Appropriate Wear For Females in School

a reply to: Nyiah

Caught yours too.

Can you answer the question posed, or can you only try to shift the spotlight?

originally posted by: Nyiah
. . . she's a fourth grade teacher. FOURTH GRADE. This is an elementary school teacher. A primary school teacher for our foreigners. Let that sink in.

Hmmmm, update?

Last I read she worked in an administration capacity. That she wasn't a teacher. And her appearance (inappropriate dress) had been addressed by her superiors.

Yes, she was too sexualized for working with kids of any age.

And again "It's Not the Dress" - - - its how she's presenting it - - - skin tight with spiked heels.

originally posted by: jjsr420
a reply to: Nyiah

No. Just no lol. Im not asking for OPINION. Let me rephrase the question.

Does that dress, and her beauty, somehow mean she cant teach properly?

More assumptions. Does anyone here have anything more than assumptions, and opinion?

Oh look, more arguing in circles. I don't give a rat's ass if she's gorgeous or fugly. We're not talking about her face. We're talking about a super-tight dress that highlights everything and puts it all on display. For 4th grade kids.

a reply to: Nyiah

So ill take that as a no, you cant answer the question. Just more evidence towards jealousy. I wasnt talking about just her face either. More assumptions.

Can anyone cite a real rule she broke?

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Nyiah
. . . she's a fourth grade teacher. FOURTH GRADE. This is an elementary school teacher. A primary school teacher for our foreigners. Let that sink in.

Hmmmm, update?

Last I read she worked in an administration capacity. That she wasn't a teacher. And her appearance (inappropriate dress) had been addressed by her superiors.

Yes, she was too sexualized for working with kids of any age.

And again "It's Not the Dress" - - - its how she's presenting it - - - skin tight with spiked heels.

Actually, I misread. She's not a teacher, she's a teacher's assistant. Not many articles making this distinction. She's still in teaching capacity, in a classroom.

originally posted by: jjsr420
a reply to: Nyiah

So ill take that as a no, you cant answer the question. Just more evidence towards jealousy. I wasnt talking about just her face either. More assumptions.

Can anyone cite a real rule she broke?

Maybe actually ask a question and stop moving goal posts when the asnwer isn't what you're wanting?

a reply to: Nyiah

Im not the one moving the goalposts. Youre shifting the spotlight. You didnt answer the question posed. You went on an unrelated tangent. Nce try though.

a reply to: Nyiah

Ill even tyoe it word by word: Does. That. Dress. Reflect. Upon. Her. Ability. To. Do. Her. Job. ???

a reply to: Spider879

I always did better in hot AND nice teachers classes.

I didnt want to let them down.

For boys, a beautiful woman can get them to learn anything she wants. You pay SOO much more attention.

I think this teacher looks fine. Fine as hell.

Really though, it works.

Women are always starting drama when they feel threatened by a beautiful woman. Get over it. It was probably hard as hell to look like that. You could too but your pleasure is more important than paying up the pain for a great body.

originally posted by: jjsr420
a reply to: Nyiah

Im not the one moving the goalposts. Youre shifting the spotlight. You didnt answer the question posed. You went on an unrelated tangent. Nce try though.

I answered you. Sorry you didn't get your validation or whatever you're fishing for. Have fun with the next person who takes the bait, though, done with your toying.

This illustrates you did not answer the question. You went on an unrelated tangent about 'subconcious lessons', and 'advertising sexuality' which have nothing to do with the question if the dress reflecting (or not) her ability to perform her job. You gave opinion, which is meaningless.

originally posted by: Nyiah

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Nyiah
. . . she's a fourth grade teacher. FOURTH GRADE. This is an elementary school teacher. A primary school teacher for our foreigners. Let that sink in.

Hmmmm, update?

Last I read she worked in an administration capacity. That she wasn't a teacher. And her appearance (inappropriate dress) had been addressed by her superiors.

Yes, she was too sexualized for working with kids of any age.

And again "It's Not the Dress" - - - its how she's presenting it - - - skin tight with spiked heels.

Actually, I misread. She's not a teacher, she's a teacher's assistant. Not many articles making this distinction. She's still in teaching capacity, in a classroom.

Thanks. I know how these stories go.

Don't always get the facts right off.

originally posted by: jjsr420
a reply to: Nyiah

So ill take that as a no, you cant answer the question. Just more evidence towards jealousy. I wasnt talking about just her face either. More assumptions.

Can anyone cite a real rule she broke?

What jealousy?

That's just stupid.

originally posted by: jjsr420
a reply to: Nyiah

Ill even tyoe it word by word: Does. That. Dress. Reflect. Upon. Her. Ability. To. Do. Her. Job. ???

YES!!!

She needs to look in a mirror and say: "IT'S NOT ABOUT ME".

Some jobs, you have to look the part. You may not like it, or think it isn't sufficiently progressive, but that's how it is.

In a profession, like teaching, accountancy or law, there are certain expectations about your presentation that don't apply to say, a scaffolder or a truck driver.

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: Spider879

I always did better in hot AND nice teachers classes.

My grandson's first grade teacher is Hot naturally. She's just a very attractive woman.

She could easily present herself in a sexualized manner. She doesn't.

She wears jeans, t-shirts, and athletic shoes or sandals.

Women who present themselves in a sexualized manner know exactly what they are doing. It's for attention.

The attention belongs on the kids.

More detraction, and deflection.

How does that dress reflect upon her ability to do her job?

Heres a hint: It doesnt.

Thats like saying a doctor with lots of tats cant do a doctors job.
Or that because i look a bit slovenly i cant do my job as a computer tech.

What someone wears, has on their skin, or anything relating to physical appearance doesnt reflect upon their ability to perform their job. Unless that job has to do with physical beauty, or lack of. In short, you are wrong.

bossip.files.wordpress.com...

Her, in jeans and a long sleeve. Still curvy, and very pretty.

Is this inappropriate too somehow?

originally posted by: jjsr420

Heres a hint: It doesnt.

It does.

And I already gave you a direct answer.

a reply to: Spider879

I guess I was not that much different than most other fathers. When my daughters went to school I thought about finding them some chain-male long handles.

I couldn't find any, but I kind of doubt they would have worn them any way.