It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: Gryphon66
Polls do matter, it tells us what story they are trying to tell, or in many cases what story they think they can get away with.
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: UKTruth
I live in New Jersey , a Die Hard Democratic State , but Most People I know who are Struggling to Keep their Homes , Pay their Bills , and send their Kids to College , are looking at Mr. Trump and Wondering what Hillary Clinton has to Offer them other than Another 4 Years of Obamanation . If Mr. Trump had a Mind to , he could Win in N.J. , even with most Unions and Liberals Dead set Against him as being our next POTUS .
originally posted by: xstealth
a reply to: UKTruth
Maine splits the votes and Trump is winning one district by a lot. The chart you show there doesn't accurately reflect that.
Obama's judges help to set election rules for November
WASHINGTON — President Obama has been unable to fill a seat on the Supreme Court for six months, but his lower court appointments could help swing the presidential election to his chosen successor.
Judges named by Obama to federal appellate and district courts overseeing North Carolina, Texas, Michigan and Wisconsin have in recent months voted to strike down restrictions on voting imposed by Republican legislatures. In Michigan and North Carolina, his Supreme Court nominees helped block efforts to restore the restrictions for this fall's elections.
The rulings could help hundreds of thousands of voters — mostly minorities who vote Democratic — get to the polls in November by removing impediments such as photo IDs and making it easier to register and vote.
"These decisions certainly demonstrate the critical importance of having a Democrat in the White House," says Nan Aron, president of the liberal Alliance for Justice. “These laws are transparent in intent, to harass and suppress the vote in states across the country.”
originally posted by: matafuchs
Take a look at this...
www.realclearpolitics.com...
They are within 36 electoral votes. About a month ago she was over 270.
Scroll down and look at the RCP electoral spread and compare the current to Obama in 2012.
Clinton is behind Obama at this point in Ohio, Florida, Iowa, Colorado, Nevada, Michigan, Wisconson,PA and NH...She could not beat Bernie without cheating and somehow people think she is going to beat Trump...
Her only saving grace right now is CA...
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: matafuchs
Take a look at this...
www.realclearpolitics.com...
They are within 36 electoral votes. About a month ago she was over 270.
Scroll down and look at the RCP electoral spread and compare the current to Obama in 2012.
Clinton is behind Obama at this point in Ohio, Florida, Iowa, Colorado, Nevada, Michigan, Wisconson,PA and NH...She could not beat Bernie without cheating and somehow people think she is going to beat Trump...
Her only saving grace right now is CA...
Same thing happened in republican race. They made fun of him said he was losing amd the closet he got to the nomination the more votes he got. Not sure how or what causes it but he's following the same pattern again.
originally posted by: matafuchs
Take a look at this...
www.realclearpolitics.com...
They are within 36 electoral votes. About a month ago she was over 270.
Scroll down and look at the RCP electoral spread and compare the current to Obama in 2012.
Clinton is behind Obama at this point in Ohio, Florida, Iowa, Colorado, Nevada, Michigan, Wisconson,PA and NH...She could not beat Bernie without cheating and somehow people think she is going to beat Trump...
Her only saving grace right now is CA...
originally posted by: Annee
Debates.
We'll see how the debates go.