List Of 13 Of The Elite Family Names...But Are There More? What Do You Think?

I disagree, the bloodline set to take over the world is . . . Patil.

originally posted by: Bubba1020
In their opinion, they are entitled to rule over the rest of us because they are the direct descendants of the ancient gods and consider themselves royal.

Which ancient gods are these people descendent of? Please tell.

These "bloodline conspiracies" are so full of holes and factual inaccuracies that one really wonders where these ideas come from. It is worth pointing out that if these families are "all powerful" then they are making a pig's ear of it. They don't really seem to be able to manage a proverbial "piss up in a brewery". Or is it part of the plan to feign incompetence? Ah, ye, that'll be it.

Regardless... Are the Plantagenets really a family anymore? They died out in the Middle Ages. Or, is their inclusion a lazy way to say that a few rich people in England who can trace ancestry back to Richard III of England (d. Agust 1485) are part of this elite group.

Good to see no ancient families from India, China or Japan (for example) are represented. Is the world really run out of Germany and England etc?

Hmm.. i have lived in towns with two of those names in seperate states. But i remember reading (may still have) a book that had some different names than these..

The elite families setup the outward NWO setup which is indicated in this G20 BS they set up to rule their flunkies...
The G20 is the World created after 911. This is a deliberate creation and 911 was one indication of their world set up of flunky countries ruled by the elite White European descent countries and the 11 third word countries..
Indeed the scions of these super powerful families are behind these flunky leaders

THE NWO--G20
The 9 Euro countries and the other 11 non European countries

9
France
Germany
US
Australia
Russia
Italy
UK
Canada
EU


11
Argentina
Brazil
China
India
Indonesia
Japan
Mexico
Saudi Arabia
South Africa
South Korea
Turkey

a reply to: Bubba1020

The Plantagenet's have been cast out from that group, the rightful king (From the Plantagenet lineage the Tudor's not having been royalty but usurpers) was working as a fork lift truck driver in Australia until a British TV program tracked him down having found proof that legally he was the rightful king of England.
Out came a history of persecution against his family by the various appointed king's and queen's from the Tudor's onward and how his family had suffered getting progressively poorer ever since, now it would be factual to point out that his family were also usurpers whom stole the throne from Godwinson etc and that all inherited nobility are essentially the descendant's of thug's and bandit's.

The Rothschild's (Red Shield) are really Bauer.
You don't hear of the Bruce so much but given that they are all married into the Hapsburg (house of Hannover and all Charlemagne's dynasty) and they in turn are in what could be regarded as eternal financial debt to the Rothschild's well though they too are now intermarried with them?.

Factual and correct however, these are the dirty grubby and nasty people behind most of the European's and later the world's suffering for many hundred's of years up to the present, look east for the next big family's though, resurgent and new Russian dynasty's as well as Chinese billionaire's and do not be surprised if the Indian's join them.

You have also left out the House of Saud, a group that is very much in cahoot' with these player's and even more evil.

originally posted by: LABTECH767
The Plantagenet's have been cast out from that group, the rightful king (From the Plantagenet lineage the Tudor's not having been royalty but usurpers) was working as a fork lift truck driver in Australia until a British TV program tracked him down having found proof that legally he was the rightful king of England.

Not sure what test of "legal" you are using here, but the rightful and legal monarch in the UK is currently Queen Elizabeth II.

The Plantagenet line died on Boswoth Field with the death of Richard III. If we going to argue the changes of monarch in English history then we could argue that the only legitimate line derives from Alfred the Great some 1,200 years ago. I think that mankes me the rightful King.

a reply to: Bubba1020

Your post, OP, was well thought out and succinctly stated.

Personally I dislike the thought of anyone having direct control over my life. However, I don't see a scenario happening out of this that would appease either side.

If the elitists want a docile, robotic society, then why is it that they are seemingly moving towards an automated society? What good will come from having almost no need for physical labor? For a society where automation will make unskilled jobs obsolete? Where some see this as a utopia, I cannot help but see this as a scenario with alot of restless people. Boredom will set in quickly. When people get bored, the stupid show starts.

Yet, without the elite control....where would we be? I foresee a situation without the elite power structure as being one of chaos. In all circles of life... humans are not alone in needing a pecking order. Without a doubt, the strict adherence to a plan keeps things in line. Gives us structure.

Just my opinion and personal observation.

a reply to: paraphi

(Don't get me wrong I do like her to a degree) She is the queen based only on a parliamentary system and tradition but LEGALLY all law's made under the Tudor's and even by Parliament after the beheaded Charles's the first since his throne was inherited via the Tudor's have been null and void (though you can not run a country by admitting that) in the legal system based on the magna carta and of course Freeman law's, this is because the country had a legitimate king by conquest of the Plantagenet line whom as you recall was deposed and killed in the war of the roses which was a violation of the term's of the magna carta which are still technically to this day statute, my mother by the way is a duchess robbed of her inheritance (A real one via the Tattersall's and it was is correctly spelled TattersHall remember the fire at windsor castle and the familys whose crest's the removed as well no family goes extinct they were just inconvenient).

Now in turn the Godwinson whom was the legitimate heir of Edward the Confessor was actually a descendant of yet more raiders, rapist's and pillagers called the Saxon's (I too am descended from them and indeed most of us in Blighty are as you yourself probably are, I have also Norman lineage not in a streight line as I am a multinational ancestry as well) but to play devil's advocate and speak the ultimate truth.

Alfred the great was perhaps the true father of the nation we today call England but there were so many, most of those kingdom's such as mercia etc Became dutchy's under the Norman's rule, the saxon equivelent of a duke had been the Earl's or Yarl's.

NON of them though had ANY CLAIM AT ALL.

Most based there claim on rule by divine right which was an invention and not a biblical rule yet in Christianity (they are supposed to be christian monarch's) there is only ONE king, Jesus (only Edward the Confessor acknowledged this though king Canute did as well in his famous throne by the sea story in which he demonstrated he had no authority over the sea and only God does) all other king's in the last book of the Bible throw there crown's before him as his is the highest kingdom and those other king's are not that came after but that have there own mansion's in god's house so in no way does that refer to earthly king's.

Just remembered another few family's, Italian's this time and we forgot the once worst of the lot the Borgia whom were the schemers and power of there day and the Medici and also the Lombard's, even worse than we had in England.

what about JP Morgan?

a reply to: LABTECH767

I think you have a poor grasp of English law and English history.

One thing about the elite, other than pure economic self-interest, they have to have a philosophy to rule the world through.

It’s actually not this illuminati group, a long defunct organization.


An obscure philosophy called synarchy is most likely the philosophy they rule through not just economic self interest.


Synarchy: The Hidden Hand Behind the European Union

www.newdawnmagazine.com...

While questions remain about the existence of a single global elite with an agenda that goes beyond simply keeping itself very, very rich, there are certainly groups that want to run the world for quite other reasons. And with the increasing globalisation of political and economic institutions, it has become easier for a relatively small group to inveigle itself into quite staggeringly influential positions. One cabal in particular reveals – alarmingly – what a small group, driven by a fanatical belief system, can achieve from the shadows. And writing as we are in the United Kingdom, this group is on our doorstep, and has been for over a century. And although perhaps small in number, its reach is big

I would expect to see the DeBeer name on this list. You know the folks who control all the major diamond mines.

How come my name isn't up there?

Nice one.

The only thing that will break the chain is free energy. When that becomes free, so do we.
The world has been forced into an oil or nuclear based economy. You work to buy food to give you calories to go to work, a vicious circle without end.
Free energy we have right now, apart from the usual solar & wind: HHO water powered engines, small hot fusion reactors, super efficient heat pumps, AC inverters that are 200% efficient, etc etc.
Tesla gas turbines that are 95% efficient & have only 1 moving part.
NOT sold in a store anywhere near you

a reply to: paraphi

Prove it?.
en.wikipedia.org...
www.telegraph.co.uk...
To be perfectly frank with you, I believe you have a VERY poor grasp of British History and Legal right's under law, but hey so do our court's, ever heard of the Freemen right's, Even a Youtube video was blocked because Freemen are legally exempt from County court since the County court only LEGALLY has right's over Serf's, but Hey guess what the City of London exercises freeman right's all the time in it's transaction's and in way's those right's were never intended to be used.
I can trace my English Ancestor's back to the Saxon's and my Celtic/Gaelic ancestry back to before that, Hallworth's, Tattershall (not Tattersall that is a bastardization of the name it was and is correctly spelled Tatterhall and traces it's origin back to a Norman whom married a Saxon noblewoman the name mean's Tate'(s) (Saxon for wife) Hall (land or property) so Wife's Land, Genetically most English or Saxon and Danish ancestry (I have both as well as of course Norman) have maternal Gealic DNA as proven to be the case in a study of Mitochondrial DNA which showed that the Invaders took local woman as there consort's and wive's (inside your cell is a nucleous with Nucleus DNA inherited from both parent's but also outside the nucleaus in the cellular cytoplasm are other body's called Mitochondria inherited only from your mother and they have there own DNA), there is even evidence that British woman traveled under both Viking (Dane and Nowegian) and Saxon rule as Icelander's have some Female British Ancestry though I am going of the subject.

Your self opinionated view of my knowledge is utterly repugnant and I suspect you are one of those mindless sheep whom has a tea cosy and a collection of royal memorabilia, sorry I Am a correct British person in that I am a Parliamentarian Republican and believe the Lord Protector, you know Cromwell, was correct when he said there is only ONE true king if we be Christian's, the only reason we have a supposed royal family today is because it served the VESTED interest of several of those Parliament member's when the Puritans went too far and became terribly unpopular by banning ale in the country and because in the game of politic's they saw a way to both depose enemy's and ingratiate themselves gaining power by installing a non legitimate puppet (not Charles Stewart whom DID legally have claim to the title if nothing else) but one William of Orange a very distant claimant whom in reality had no claim at all, they even went so far as to rewrite the law in order to make it so and label the Lord Protector, an extremely devout English puritan a traitor and sentenced him to suffer the same fate as Charles the first had, of course legaly the NEW elected monarchy was not as powerful and though they technically had to sign off what parliament imposed it was merely a formality from then onward.

Now historian's will claim that Charles deposing was because of his catholicism and his wish to re-associate the Anglican church with Rome however his deposing was more about political movement's and wrangling and so was the civil war which was part and parcel of it, not our first civil war either or our bloodiest there are several battlefields near to me from both that and the war of the Roses (I am actually in Lancashire), non of those claimant's had any real claim in any of those war's but there is the concept of established monarchy which is both false and conceptual only.

In fact if there is any royalty I actually do like it would have to be our Vicky, in part because I happen to be a distant relative though I am somewhat mixed and have probably Jewish female ancestry on my mother's mother's line as well as Maori on my paternal matriarchal side, in another twist my maternal great granfather probably fought my paternal matriarch's relative's as he was an officer in the New Zealand mounted police in the Maori War's.
My Maternal Grandfather was British Military intelligence before the war and performed unspecified duty's during the war (WW2) while My paternal grandfather was Navy.

This list may contain some top families, but they certainly are missing quite a few power players.

Why do we even call them the Windsors? Call them by their real surname, the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha family is their true name, and is probably still used secretly by them. "Windsor" is just a pet name for the plebs to know them by.

What about the old Roman Patrician families?

I'd be more akin to believe the families in the video below would have more sway in Elite circles. I mean, these are really OLD, OLD powerful families. These people put the "Nep" in Nepotism and the 'Cult" in Occult.

(sorry in advance for the music in this video)



I mean, let's be honest. When your family has their very own century's old obelisk, you're pretty much Illuminati royalty.

originally posted by: [post=21238512]Privy_Princess[post]
This list may contain some top families, but they certainly are missing quite a few power players.

Why do we even call them the Windsors? Call them by their real surname, the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha family is their true name, and is probably still used secretly by them. "Windsor" is just a pet name for the plebs to know them by.

What about the old Roman Patrician families?

I'd be more akin to believe the families in the video below would have more sway in Elite circles. I mean, these are really OLD, OLD powerful families. These people put the "Nep" in Nepotism and the 'Cult" in Occult.

(sorry in advance for the music in this video)

I mean, let's be honest. When your family has their very own century's old obelisk, you're pretty much Illuminati royalty.

I haven't come across this video before but i concur until someone can prove to me different. These are the hidden hands