It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Konduit
We've already seen what will become the official narrative from the people here ... he must be a Trump plant, part of that "vast right wing conspiracy." He has the red hat and everything.
originally posted by: tadaman
I get it.
Its a trap for Trump.
Make him comment on it, allude to the "he will go after families of...." argument which was taken out of context.
It is a set up to see if he says anything about the guy being there, then they can say Trump meant that he should be incriminated by association.
originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
I don't see what the problem is? Did the father do the shooting? maybe he was there to offer support to his sons victims or just to show support for his political party. He is also a victim imagine what he has been through.
Are we to blame the father for some reason? I ask again why should he not be there?.
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
I don't see what the problem is? Did the father do the shooting? maybe he was there to offer support to his sons victims or just to show support for his political party. He is also a victim imagine what he has been through.
Are we to blame the father for some reason? I ask again why should he not be there?.
If the relatives of Clive Bundy or other sovereign citizens that did not participate in the rallies against the federal government appeared at a Trump rally, would you be saying the same thing?
If the father of a soldier who was abusing prisoners at Aby Grahab appeared at a Trump rally, would you be saying the same thing?
If the father of Timothy McVeigh or Terry NIchols appeared at a Trump rally, would you be saying the same thing?