It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: defiythelie
a reply to: RickinVa
The Dem's really do not have to anything at this point. Trump is doing all the work by himself. Self destructing . Polls have Clinton at a 83%+ chance of winning. Even in fox news latest poll Clinton is up by 10 points.
The Primary Model predicts that Trump will defeat Clinton with 87 percent certainty. He is the candidate of change. When voters demand change, they are willing to overlook many foibles of the change candidate. At the same time, the candidate who touts experience will get more intense scrutiny for any missteps and suspicions of misconduct of the record of experience.
originally posted by: ladyinwaiting
a reply to: Indigo5
Didn't mean to diss your thread. It wasn't personal. I was only trying to make a point, didn't mean to do so at your expense.
originally posted by: roadgravel
"I never thought to stay here without papers. I had a visa. I traveled every few months back to the country to Slovenia to stamp the visa," she said during the MSNBC interview.
U.S. immigration law did not require such trips that Mrs. Trump describes for work-visa holders at the time. People who hold visitor visas would be required to leave the country on or before the end date of their authorized stay. U.S. law does not allow someone to use a visitor visa to regularly live and work in the country.
Basically did she get paid for working while on a tourist visa in 1995. Agency say no but who can you trust anymore.
I am not a defender of most of Trump's nonsense ramblings but was he even around her at that time.
why is this post not considered racist? If any republican ever questioned anything about citizenship, the cries of RACIST rang out like bell. Post like this show that Democrats use words that end in "isms" and "ists" to shut you up and make you agree with them.
originally posted by: BO XIAN
a reply to: Indigo5
Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
the facts are
that the current WH Destroyer in Chief
has farrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr worse, more serious, more outrageous, more criminal, corrupt, deceptive, manipulated gaps in his educational record, birth record, immigration . . . records than probably any other public figure in our history. Yet the Oligarchy succeeded in shoving him down our throats with their delusional full court propaganda press--much as they are doing with the screechy one.
He's, at his core, virtually the opposite of how he was presented.
President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia was a career intelligence officer, trained to identify vulnerabilities in an individual and to exploit them.
That is exactly what he did early in the primaries. Mr. Putin played upon Mr. Trump’s vulnerabilities by complimenting him. He responded just as Mr. Putin had calculated.
Mr. Putin is a great leader, Mr. Trump says, ignoring that he has killed and jailed journalists and political opponents, has invaded two of his neighbors and is driving his economy to ruin. Mr. Trump has also taken policy positions consistent with Russian, not American, interests — endorsing Russian espionage against the United States, supporting Russia’s annexation of Crimea and giving a green light to a possible Russian invasion of the Baltic States.
In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
a reply to: spiritualzombie
It gets even funnier if you think about it hard enough. (-puts on my tinfoil hat-) Isn't it a bit suspicious that:
1. Orly Taitz, the Queen of the anti-Obama "birther" movement, is from a former Soviet country?
2. Melania Trump is from Slovenia, which was then part of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia?
3. Donald Trump praises Russia's leader Putin & acts like a Putin ally?
4. Trump's foreign policy adviser Carter Page supposedly visited Moscow in July to give "speeches criticizing decades of U.S. foreign policy"? (link)
At what point are the conspiracy theorists going to wake up and connect the dots! After all of the Nibiru threads, threads with Apocalyptic predictions, and other conspiracies, I'm actually disappointed at the lack of conspiracies about the birther movement being a Russia "PSYOP", Melania being a Soviet spy/double agent, and Donald being a Russian Manchurian Candidate. lol
(-takes off tinfoil hat-) To be fair, I don't actually have a problem with immigrants or anyone who tries to better themselves. If that's what she did in 1995, so be it. But I do have a problem with the right wing's hypocritical double standards when contrasting their anti-immigrant rhetoric to the apologist crap we're seeing in this thread when it's one of their own who's actions are suspicious.
I must confess I wondered to than I looked in to her background she was living in Milan and paris. So you can see she shut the door on her country long before she moved to the US. But as an international model in thr 90s Russia was having so many problems they couldnt afford a stick of gUm much less plot against Trump.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
And the right wing still isn't convinced (as this thread on ATS's front page shows).
FYI, I am not right wing and that's my thread.
But, please do go after all the proof you feel you need. I think it's totally fair.
originally posted by: roadgravel
a reply to: Indigo5
Is the photographer being truthful about '95 or could some else given her payment was my point about that one.
I thought she admitted to the shoot in '95.
How could she be in pictures then in the US and not be here...
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
Actually, that supports my theory if you think about it. The Soviets were so poor and desperate that they had to use a crazy plot like this. Think about all of the movies that start with one lone operative who must save his/her people from the big bad enemy. My theory claims that Melania and Orly were those operatives (assuming those are their real names).
like I'm supposed to take 1 article as definitive proof of no immigration shenanigans.
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
a reply to: Indigo5
Well then... I was just playfully pointing out their double standards but that's actually pretty interesting.
UKRAINE:
President Viktor F. Yanukovych, who owed his election to, as an American diplomat put it, an “extreme makeover” Mr. Manafort oversaw, bolted the country in the face of violent street protests. He found sanctuary in Russia and never returned, as his patron, President Vladimir V. Putin, proceeded to dismember Ukraine, annexing Crimea and fomenting a war in two other provinces that continues.
“Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets,” Trump’s son, Donald Jr., told a real estate conference in 2008, according to an account posted on the website of eTurboNews, a trade publication. “We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia.”
originally posted by: Logarock
a reply to: Indigo5
Problem with this is the whole establishment is in full Trump destroy mode. That would include dumbsh*t like this with Putin. I mean come on and see the last weeks press attack as a whole ball of yarn.
originally posted by: Logarock
a reply to: Indigo5
Problem with this is the whole establishment is in full Trump destroy mode. That would include dumbsh*t like this with Putin. I mean come on and see the last weeks press attack as a whole ball of yarn.